腹部成形术和腹部自由皮瓣手术后的切口负压伤口治疗:结果和成本回顾的荟萃分析。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Christopher F Brewer, Zaki Manan, Benjamin H Miranda
{"title":"腹部成形术和腹部自由皮瓣手术后的切口负压伤口治疗:结果和成本回顾的荟萃分析。","authors":"Christopher F Brewer, Zaki Manan, Benjamin H Miranda","doi":"10.12968/jowc.2023.0113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Incisional negative pressure wound therapy (iNPWT) is purported to enhance wound healing and reduce the incidence of surgical site wound complications (SSWCs). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and associated costs of iNPWT for abdominoplasty or abdominal free flap donor site surgeries.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A literature review was undertaken for studies relating to iNPWT and SSWCs following abdominoplasty or abdominal free flap procedures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After applying the exclusion criteria, 12 studies were identified, incorporating 517 and 589 patients in the iNPWT and control groups, respectively. Pooled analysis identified a significant reduction in the incidence of wound dehiscence in the iNPWT group compared with the control arm (11.7% versus 20.2%, respectively; p<0.05), with meta-analysis demonstrating a relative risk (RR) of 0.60 in the iNPWT group versus controls (RR: 0.60, 95% confidence interval: 0.42-0.87, I<sup>2</sup>=0%; p=0.85). Incidence of all other SSWCs was comparable between both groups. The two studies which reported associated healthcare costs found iNPWT to be comparable with standard of care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis provides evidence to support the judicious use of iNPWT to reduce wound dehiscence in high-risk abdominoplasty and abdominal free flap donor site surgeries. The evidence for reduction of other SSWCs is lacking, and any effect is likely to be minimal. Heterogeneity and poor study design limit the strength of these quantitative findings, and higher quality randomised controlled trials are required in this area.</p>","PeriodicalId":17590,"journal":{"name":"Journal of wound care","volume":"34 4","pages":"286-293"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incisional negative pressure wound therapy following abdominoplasty and abdominal free flap surgery: a meta-analysis of outcomes and review of costs.\",\"authors\":\"Christopher F Brewer, Zaki Manan, Benjamin H Miranda\",\"doi\":\"10.12968/jowc.2023.0113\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Incisional negative pressure wound therapy (iNPWT) is purported to enhance wound healing and reduce the incidence of surgical site wound complications (SSWCs). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and associated costs of iNPWT for abdominoplasty or abdominal free flap donor site surgeries.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A literature review was undertaken for studies relating to iNPWT and SSWCs following abdominoplasty or abdominal free flap procedures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After applying the exclusion criteria, 12 studies were identified, incorporating 517 and 589 patients in the iNPWT and control groups, respectively. Pooled analysis identified a significant reduction in the incidence of wound dehiscence in the iNPWT group compared with the control arm (11.7% versus 20.2%, respectively; p<0.05), with meta-analysis demonstrating a relative risk (RR) of 0.60 in the iNPWT group versus controls (RR: 0.60, 95% confidence interval: 0.42-0.87, I<sup>2</sup>=0%; p=0.85). Incidence of all other SSWCs was comparable between both groups. The two studies which reported associated healthcare costs found iNPWT to be comparable with standard of care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis provides evidence to support the judicious use of iNPWT to reduce wound dehiscence in high-risk abdominoplasty and abdominal free flap donor site surgeries. The evidence for reduction of other SSWCs is lacking, and any effect is likely to be minimal. Heterogeneity and poor study design limit the strength of these quantitative findings, and higher quality randomised controlled trials are required in this area.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17590,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of wound care\",\"volume\":\"34 4\",\"pages\":\"286-293\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of wound care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2023.0113\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of wound care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2023.0113","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:切口负压创面治疗(iNPWT)旨在促进创面愈合,减少手术部位创面并发症(SSWCs)的发生率。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估iNPWT用于腹部成形术或腹部自由皮瓣供区手术的疗效和相关成本。方法:对腹部成形术或腹部游离皮瓣手术后发生iNPWT和SSWCs的相关研究进行文献回顾。结果:应用排除标准后,确定了12项研究,iNPWT组和对照组分别纳入517例和589例患者。合并分析发现,与对照组相比,iNPWT组伤口裂开的发生率显著降低(分别为11.7%和20.2%;p2 = 0%;p = 0.85)。所有其他SSWCs的发生率在两组之间具有可比性。报告相关医疗费用的两项研究发现,iNPWT与标准护理相当。结论:本系统综述和荟萃分析为在高风险腹部成形术和腹部自由皮瓣供区手术中明智地使用iNPWT来减少伤口裂开提供了证据。减少其他sscs的证据是缺乏的,任何影响都可能是微乎其微的。异质性和不良的研究设计限制了这些定量研究结果的强度,在这一领域需要更高质量的随机对照试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Incisional negative pressure wound therapy following abdominoplasty and abdominal free flap surgery: a meta-analysis of outcomes and review of costs.

Objective: Incisional negative pressure wound therapy (iNPWT) is purported to enhance wound healing and reduce the incidence of surgical site wound complications (SSWCs). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and associated costs of iNPWT for abdominoplasty or abdominal free flap donor site surgeries.

Method: A literature review was undertaken for studies relating to iNPWT and SSWCs following abdominoplasty or abdominal free flap procedures.

Results: After applying the exclusion criteria, 12 studies were identified, incorporating 517 and 589 patients in the iNPWT and control groups, respectively. Pooled analysis identified a significant reduction in the incidence of wound dehiscence in the iNPWT group compared with the control arm (11.7% versus 20.2%, respectively; p<0.05), with meta-analysis demonstrating a relative risk (RR) of 0.60 in the iNPWT group versus controls (RR: 0.60, 95% confidence interval: 0.42-0.87, I2=0%; p=0.85). Incidence of all other SSWCs was comparable between both groups. The two studies which reported associated healthcare costs found iNPWT to be comparable with standard of care.

Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis provides evidence to support the judicious use of iNPWT to reduce wound dehiscence in high-risk abdominoplasty and abdominal free flap donor site surgeries. The evidence for reduction of other SSWCs is lacking, and any effect is likely to be minimal. Heterogeneity and poor study design limit the strength of these quantitative findings, and higher quality randomised controlled trials are required in this area.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of wound care
Journal of wound care DERMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
10.50%
发文量
215
期刊介绍: Journal of Wound Care (JWC) is the definitive wound-care journal and the leading source of up-to-date research and clinical information on everything related to tissue viability. The journal was first launched in 1992 and aimed at catering to the needs of the multidisciplinary team. Published monthly, the journal’s international audience includes nurses, doctors and researchers specialising in wound management and tissue viability, as well as generalists wishing to enhance their practice. In addition to cutting edge and state-of-the-art research and practice articles, JWC also covers topics related to wound-care management, education and novel therapies, as well as JWC cases supplements, a supplement dedicated solely to case reports and case series in wound care. All articles are rigorously peer-reviewed by a panel of international experts, comprised of clinicians, nurses and researchers. Specifically, JWC publishes: High quality evidence on all aspects of wound care, including leg ulcers, pressure ulcers, the diabetic foot, burns, surgical wounds, wound infection and more The latest developments and innovations in wound care through both preclinical and preliminary clinical trials of potential new treatments worldwide In-depth prospective studies of new treatment applications, as well as high-level research evidence on existing treatments Clinical case studies providing information on how to deal with complex wounds Comprehensive literature reviews on current concepts and practice, including cost-effectiveness Updates on the activities of wound care societies around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信