低水平激光治疗母乳喂养期间乳头创伤和疼痛:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 1.4
Maria Victória Candida Gaitero, Ticiana Aparecida Alves de Mira, Edna Jéssica Lima Gondim, Simony Lira do Nascimento, Fernanda Garanhani Surita
{"title":"低水平激光治疗母乳喂养期间乳头创伤和疼痛:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Maria Victória Candida Gaitero, Ticiana Aparecida Alves de Mira, Edna Jéssica Lima Gondim, Simony Lira do Nascimento, Fernanda Garanhani Surita","doi":"10.61622/rbgo/2025rbgo3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the effect of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on nipple trauma and pain during breastfeeding through a systematic review with a meta-analysis of selected studies.</p><p><strong>Source of the data: </strong>A thorough search was conducted on March 22, 2022, using the databases PubMed, SciELO, LILACS, PEDro, CINAHL, EMBASE, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Google Scholar, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, Clinical Trials, Web of Science, TRIP, DARE, and ProQuest. The search terms included various combinations of low-level laser therapy, nipple pain, nipple trauma, and breastfeeding.</p><p><strong>Studies selection: </strong>Out of 107 articles identified, only three controlled and randomized clinical trials was included. The extracted data encompassed breast and trauma characteristics, treatment types, outcomes (pain and healing process), evaluation tools, LLLT usage, laser brand, and parameters.</p><p><strong>Data collection: </strong>Data extraction was performed using RAYYAN for systematic reviews. The risk of bias in the studies was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>Pain was measured using the visual analog scale (VAS). The included studies did not use validated tools for assessing physical conditions. All studies employed LLLT with a 660-nm wavelength, though there were variations in equipment power, energy dose, and application methods. The meta-analysis revealed an average difference of -0.60 points (95% CI: -1.52 to 0.31) in the VAS pain scores between the LLLT and control groups. No heterogeneity was observed among the studies (I2=0%), indicating no significant difference in pain relief between LLLT (red light) and control groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LLLT may offer a promising option for managing breastfeeding-related complications, though further research is required.</p>","PeriodicalId":74699,"journal":{"name":"Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia","volume":"47 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12002722/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Low-level laser therapy for nipple trauma and pain during breastfeeding: systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Maria Victória Candida Gaitero, Ticiana Aparecida Alves de Mira, Edna Jéssica Lima Gondim, Simony Lira do Nascimento, Fernanda Garanhani Surita\",\"doi\":\"10.61622/rbgo/2025rbgo3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the effect of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on nipple trauma and pain during breastfeeding through a systematic review with a meta-analysis of selected studies.</p><p><strong>Source of the data: </strong>A thorough search was conducted on March 22, 2022, using the databases PubMed, SciELO, LILACS, PEDro, CINAHL, EMBASE, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Google Scholar, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, Clinical Trials, Web of Science, TRIP, DARE, and ProQuest. The search terms included various combinations of low-level laser therapy, nipple pain, nipple trauma, and breastfeeding.</p><p><strong>Studies selection: </strong>Out of 107 articles identified, only three controlled and randomized clinical trials was included. The extracted data encompassed breast and trauma characteristics, treatment types, outcomes (pain and healing process), evaluation tools, LLLT usage, laser brand, and parameters.</p><p><strong>Data collection: </strong>Data extraction was performed using RAYYAN for systematic reviews. The risk of bias in the studies was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>Pain was measured using the visual analog scale (VAS). The included studies did not use validated tools for assessing physical conditions. All studies employed LLLT with a 660-nm wavelength, though there were variations in equipment power, energy dose, and application methods. The meta-analysis revealed an average difference of -0.60 points (95% CI: -1.52 to 0.31) in the VAS pain scores between the LLLT and control groups. No heterogeneity was observed among the studies (I2=0%), indicating no significant difference in pain relief between LLLT (red light) and control groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LLLT may offer a promising option for managing breastfeeding-related complications, though further research is required.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74699,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia\",\"volume\":\"47 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12002722/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.61622/rbgo/2025rbgo3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61622/rbgo/2025rbgo3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在通过系统回顾和荟萃分析,探讨低水平激光治疗(LLLT)对母乳喂养期间乳头创伤和疼痛的影响。数据来源:我们于2022年3月22日对PubMed、SciELO、LILACS、PEDro、CINAHL、EMBASE、ScienceDirect、Scopus、谷歌Scholar、MEDLINE、Cochrane Library、临床试验、Web of Science、TRIP、DARE和ProQuest等数据库进行了全面的检索。搜索词包括低水平激光治疗、乳头疼痛、乳头创伤和母乳喂养的各种组合。研究选择:在确定的107篇文章中,仅包括3项对照和随机临床试验。提取的数据包括乳房和创伤特征、治疗类型、结果(疼痛和愈合过程)、评估工具、LLLT使用、激光品牌和参数。数据收集:使用RAYYAN进行数据提取,进行系统评价。对研究中的偏倚风险进行了评估。数据综合:采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)测量疼痛。纳入的研究没有使用经过验证的工具来评估身体状况。所有研究均采用波长为660 nm的LLLT,但设备功率、能量剂量和应用方法有所不同。荟萃分析显示,LLLT组和对照组的VAS疼痛评分平均差异为-0.60分(95% CI: -1.52至0.31)。研究间无异质性(I2=0%),表明LLLT(红灯)组与对照组疼痛缓解无显著差异。结论:尽管需要进一步的研究,但LLLT可能为管理母乳喂养相关并发症提供了一个有希望的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Low-level laser therapy for nipple trauma and pain during breastfeeding: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Low-level laser therapy for nipple trauma and pain during breastfeeding: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Low-level laser therapy for nipple trauma and pain during breastfeeding: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Low-level laser therapy for nipple trauma and pain during breastfeeding: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the effect of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on nipple trauma and pain during breastfeeding through a systematic review with a meta-analysis of selected studies.

Source of the data: A thorough search was conducted on March 22, 2022, using the databases PubMed, SciELO, LILACS, PEDro, CINAHL, EMBASE, ScienceDirect, Scopus, Google Scholar, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, Clinical Trials, Web of Science, TRIP, DARE, and ProQuest. The search terms included various combinations of low-level laser therapy, nipple pain, nipple trauma, and breastfeeding.

Studies selection: Out of 107 articles identified, only three controlled and randomized clinical trials was included. The extracted data encompassed breast and trauma characteristics, treatment types, outcomes (pain and healing process), evaluation tools, LLLT usage, laser brand, and parameters.

Data collection: Data extraction was performed using RAYYAN for systematic reviews. The risk of bias in the studies was evaluated.

Data synthesis: Pain was measured using the visual analog scale (VAS). The included studies did not use validated tools for assessing physical conditions. All studies employed LLLT with a 660-nm wavelength, though there were variations in equipment power, energy dose, and application methods. The meta-analysis revealed an average difference of -0.60 points (95% CI: -1.52 to 0.31) in the VAS pain scores between the LLLT and control groups. No heterogeneity was observed among the studies (I2=0%), indicating no significant difference in pain relief between LLLT (red light) and control groups.

Conclusion: LLLT may offer a promising option for managing breastfeeding-related complications, though further research is required.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信