社区卫生中心阿片类药物使用障碍患者的亚型和服务利用:来自美国东北部医疗服务不足的城市地区的调查结果

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Orrin D Ware, Jamey J Lister, Sarah E Cooper, Andrew H Kim, Holly H Lister, N Andrew Peterson, Stephen Fioravanti, Kristen Gilmore Powell, Stephanie C Marcello, Bethany Joseph
{"title":"社区卫生中心阿片类药物使用障碍患者的亚型和服务利用:来自美国东北部医疗服务不足的城市地区的调查结果","authors":"Orrin D Ware, Jamey J Lister, Sarah E Cooper, Andrew H Kim, Holly H Lister, N Andrew Peterson, Stephen Fioravanti, Kristen Gilmore Powell, Stephanie C Marcello, Bethany Joseph","doi":"10.1186/s13722-025-00564-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Opioid use disorder often co-occurs with other mental health and substance use disorders. Identifying clusters of individuals receiving treatment for opioid use disorder based on co-diagnosed conditions, healthcare plans, and service utilization over a seven-year treatment period provides insight into service needs. Objectives included [1] characterizing the sample [2], examining subtypes of the sample using cluster analysis, and [3] identifying differences in Current Procedural Terminology by subtype to examine service utilization among identified clusters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study uses secondary data from the electronic medical records of a community health center in a large urban area in the Northeastern United States from 2015 to 2021. The study sample included N = 705 adults who had an opioid use disorder diagnosis as indicated by the community health center's electronic medical records. Measures include [1] age [2], race and ethnicity [3], sex [4], healthcare plan(s) [5], co-occurring mental health disorder [6], co-occurring substance use disorder [7], co-occurring mental health disorder or substance use disorder, and [8] Current Procedural Terminology codes for behavioral health service utilization. Cluster analysis was used to examine the sample. These clusters were then analyzed for service utilization with a one-way analysis of variance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cluster analysis identified six clusters with an average silhouette of 0.5, indicating good clustering. These six clusters were operationalized as [1] Medicare/Medicaid healthcare plan with substance use disorder needs [2], Private pay and charity care healthcare plan with cocaine use disorder needs [3], Medicare/Medicaid and other publicly-funded healthcare plans with mood disorder needs [4], Private healthcare plan with low co-occurring disorder needs [5], Other publicly-funded healthcare plan with cannabis use disorder needs [6], Medicare/Medicaid healthcare plan with mental health disorder needs. Service utilization differed between these clusters with cluster mean differences for psychotherapy sessions (F = 8.55, p < 0.001), psychiatric sessions (F = 22.72, p < 0.001), and group therapy sessions (F = 10.76, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights the importance of comprehensive and integrated treatment for substance use disorders and mental health disorders, particularly for those in underserved communities. Healthcare coverage, a socioeconomic factor that impacts access to care, is critical in distinguishing treatment needs and utilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":54223,"journal":{"name":"Addiction Science & Clinical Practice","volume":"20 1","pages":"39"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12060499/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Subtypes and service utilization among opioid use disorder patients at a community health center: findings from a medically underserved urban area of the Northeastern United States.\",\"authors\":\"Orrin D Ware, Jamey J Lister, Sarah E Cooper, Andrew H Kim, Holly H Lister, N Andrew Peterson, Stephen Fioravanti, Kristen Gilmore Powell, Stephanie C Marcello, Bethany Joseph\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13722-025-00564-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Opioid use disorder often co-occurs with other mental health and substance use disorders. Identifying clusters of individuals receiving treatment for opioid use disorder based on co-diagnosed conditions, healthcare plans, and service utilization over a seven-year treatment period provides insight into service needs. Objectives included [1] characterizing the sample [2], examining subtypes of the sample using cluster analysis, and [3] identifying differences in Current Procedural Terminology by subtype to examine service utilization among identified clusters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study uses secondary data from the electronic medical records of a community health center in a large urban area in the Northeastern United States from 2015 to 2021. The study sample included N = 705 adults who had an opioid use disorder diagnosis as indicated by the community health center's electronic medical records. Measures include [1] age [2], race and ethnicity [3], sex [4], healthcare plan(s) [5], co-occurring mental health disorder [6], co-occurring substance use disorder [7], co-occurring mental health disorder or substance use disorder, and [8] Current Procedural Terminology codes for behavioral health service utilization. Cluster analysis was used to examine the sample. These clusters were then analyzed for service utilization with a one-way analysis of variance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cluster analysis identified six clusters with an average silhouette of 0.5, indicating good clustering. These six clusters were operationalized as [1] Medicare/Medicaid healthcare plan with substance use disorder needs [2], Private pay and charity care healthcare plan with cocaine use disorder needs [3], Medicare/Medicaid and other publicly-funded healthcare plans with mood disorder needs [4], Private healthcare plan with low co-occurring disorder needs [5], Other publicly-funded healthcare plan with cannabis use disorder needs [6], Medicare/Medicaid healthcare plan with mental health disorder needs. Service utilization differed between these clusters with cluster mean differences for psychotherapy sessions (F = 8.55, p < 0.001), psychiatric sessions (F = 22.72, p < 0.001), and group therapy sessions (F = 10.76, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights the importance of comprehensive and integrated treatment for substance use disorders and mental health disorders, particularly for those in underserved communities. Healthcare coverage, a socioeconomic factor that impacts access to care, is critical in distinguishing treatment needs and utilization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Addiction Science & Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"39\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12060499/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Addiction Science & Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13722-025-00564-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addiction Science & Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13722-025-00564-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:阿片类药物使用障碍通常与其他精神健康和物质使用障碍共同发生。根据共同诊断的病症、医疗保健计划和七年治疗期间的服务利用情况,确定接受阿片类药物使用障碍治疗的个体群,可以深入了解服务需求。目标包括[1]表征样本[2],使用聚类分析检查样本的亚型,[3]根据亚型识别当前程序术语的差异,以检查所识别的集群之间的服务利用情况。方法:本研究使用的二手数据来自美国东北部某大城市社区卫生中心2015 - 2021年的电子病历。研究样本包括N = 705名成年人,他们被社区卫生中心的电子医疗记录诊断为阿片类药物使用障碍。措施包括[1]年龄[2]、种族和民族[3]、性别[4]、医疗保健计划[5]、共同发生的精神健康障碍[6]、共同发生的物质使用障碍[7]、共同发生的精神健康障碍或物质使用障碍[8]行为卫生服务利用的现行程序术语代码。采用聚类分析对样本进行检验。然后用单向方差分析分析这些集群的服务利用率。结果:聚类分析确定了6个聚类,平均剪影为0.5,表明聚类良好。这6个分组分别为[1]医疗保险/医疗补助计划与物质使用障碍需要[2]、私人薪酬和慈善保健医疗计划与可卡因使用障碍需要[3]、医疗保险/医疗补助和其他公费医疗计划与情绪障碍需要[4]、私人医疗计划与低共患障碍需要[5]、其他公费医疗计划与大麻使用障碍需要[6]、有精神健康障碍需要的医疗保险/医疗补助计划。结论:本研究强调了对物质使用障碍和精神健康障碍进行全面和综合治疗的重要性,特别是对那些服务不足的社区。医疗保险是影响获得医疗服务的一个社会经济因素,在区分治疗需求和利用方面至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Subtypes and service utilization among opioid use disorder patients at a community health center: findings from a medically underserved urban area of the Northeastern United States.

Background: Opioid use disorder often co-occurs with other mental health and substance use disorders. Identifying clusters of individuals receiving treatment for opioid use disorder based on co-diagnosed conditions, healthcare plans, and service utilization over a seven-year treatment period provides insight into service needs. Objectives included [1] characterizing the sample [2], examining subtypes of the sample using cluster analysis, and [3] identifying differences in Current Procedural Terminology by subtype to examine service utilization among identified clusters.

Methods: This study uses secondary data from the electronic medical records of a community health center in a large urban area in the Northeastern United States from 2015 to 2021. The study sample included N = 705 adults who had an opioid use disorder diagnosis as indicated by the community health center's electronic medical records. Measures include [1] age [2], race and ethnicity [3], sex [4], healthcare plan(s) [5], co-occurring mental health disorder [6], co-occurring substance use disorder [7], co-occurring mental health disorder or substance use disorder, and [8] Current Procedural Terminology codes for behavioral health service utilization. Cluster analysis was used to examine the sample. These clusters were then analyzed for service utilization with a one-way analysis of variance.

Results: The cluster analysis identified six clusters with an average silhouette of 0.5, indicating good clustering. These six clusters were operationalized as [1] Medicare/Medicaid healthcare plan with substance use disorder needs [2], Private pay and charity care healthcare plan with cocaine use disorder needs [3], Medicare/Medicaid and other publicly-funded healthcare plans with mood disorder needs [4], Private healthcare plan with low co-occurring disorder needs [5], Other publicly-funded healthcare plan with cannabis use disorder needs [6], Medicare/Medicaid healthcare plan with mental health disorder needs. Service utilization differed between these clusters with cluster mean differences for psychotherapy sessions (F = 8.55, p < 0.001), psychiatric sessions (F = 22.72, p < 0.001), and group therapy sessions (F = 10.76, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: This study highlights the importance of comprehensive and integrated treatment for substance use disorders and mental health disorders, particularly for those in underserved communities. Healthcare coverage, a socioeconomic factor that impacts access to care, is critical in distinguishing treatment needs and utilization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
64
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: Addiction Science & Clinical Practice provides a forum for clinically relevant research and perspectives that contribute to improving the quality of care for people with unhealthy alcohol, tobacco, or other drug use and addictive behaviours across a spectrum of clinical settings. Addiction Science & Clinical Practice accepts articles of clinical relevance related to the prevention and treatment of unhealthy alcohol, tobacco, and other drug use across the spectrum of clinical settings. Topics of interest address issues related to the following: the spectrum of unhealthy use of alcohol, tobacco, and other drugs among the range of affected persons (e.g., not limited by age, race/ethnicity, gender, or sexual orientation); the array of clinical prevention and treatment practices (from health messages, to identification and early intervention, to more extensive interventions including counseling and pharmacotherapy and other management strategies); and identification and management of medical, psychiatric, social, and other health consequences of substance use. Addiction Science & Clinical Practice is particularly interested in articles that address how to improve the quality of care for people with unhealthy substance use and related conditions as described in the (US) Institute of Medicine report, Improving the Quality of Healthcare for Mental Health and Substance Use Conditions (Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2006). Such articles address the quality of care and of health services. Although the journal also welcomes submissions that address these conditions in addiction speciality-treatment settings, the journal is particularly interested in including articles that address unhealthy use outside these settings, including experience with novel models of care and outcomes, and outcomes of research-practice collaborations. Although Addiction Science & Clinical Practice is generally not an outlet for basic science research, we will accept basic science research manuscripts that have clearly described potential clinical relevance and are accessible to audiences outside a narrow laboratory research field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信