新冠肺炎时期鼻骨损伤视频诊疗——它是常规诊疗的有效工具吗?

IF 1 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology Pub Date : 2025-04-15 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1801313
Ved Narang, Megan McGlone, Nick Calder
{"title":"新冠肺炎时期鼻骨损伤视频诊疗——它是常规诊疗的有效工具吗?","authors":"Ved Narang, Megan McGlone, Nick Calder","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1801313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>  We previously investigated the impact of video clinics on the management of closed nasal bone injuries during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The aim of that study was to assess the feasibility of managing patients at their homes or workplaces, with instructions to attend outpatient clinics the next working day if they suspected any deviation or reduced nasal airflow, for further evaluation. <b>Objective</b>  To compare the results of our previous research with the traditional, in-person nasal injury clinics, using the same criteria as in our prior investigation. <b>Methods</b>  We analyzed 3 months of preexisting data from video clinics and collected 6 months of data from face-to-face clinics. We gathered information on the number of patients, categorized by age and gender, as well as records of missed appointments (DNAs) and the requirement for nasal manipulations. Data analysis was conducted using the Chi-Squared test in SciPy Python 3.0 (open source). <b>Results</b>  The statistical analysis revealed no significant differences between the 2 groups concerning the number of patients with closed nasal bone injuries, both under and over 18 years of age ( <i>p</i> -value: 0.961), the rate of missed appointments ( <i>p</i> -value: 0.0734), and the need for fracture reduction ( <i>p</i> -value: 0.0734). <b>Conclusions</b>  The findings suggest that video clinics are equally effective in managing suspected nasal bone injuries and should not be restricted to emergency situations. However, it is advisable to adopt a balanced approach considering the additional costs associated with appointments.</p>","PeriodicalId":13731,"journal":{"name":"International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology","volume":"29 2","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12020573/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Video Clinics for Nasal Bone Injuries in COVID Times - Is it a Valid Tool for Routine Practice?\",\"authors\":\"Ved Narang, Megan McGlone, Nick Calder\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0044-1801313\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>  We previously investigated the impact of video clinics on the management of closed nasal bone injuries during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The aim of that study was to assess the feasibility of managing patients at their homes or workplaces, with instructions to attend outpatient clinics the next working day if they suspected any deviation or reduced nasal airflow, for further evaluation. <b>Objective</b>  To compare the results of our previous research with the traditional, in-person nasal injury clinics, using the same criteria as in our prior investigation. <b>Methods</b>  We analyzed 3 months of preexisting data from video clinics and collected 6 months of data from face-to-face clinics. We gathered information on the number of patients, categorized by age and gender, as well as records of missed appointments (DNAs) and the requirement for nasal manipulations. Data analysis was conducted using the Chi-Squared test in SciPy Python 3.0 (open source). <b>Results</b>  The statistical analysis revealed no significant differences between the 2 groups concerning the number of patients with closed nasal bone injuries, both under and over 18 years of age ( <i>p</i> -value: 0.961), the rate of missed appointments ( <i>p</i> -value: 0.0734), and the need for fracture reduction ( <i>p</i> -value: 0.0734). <b>Conclusions</b>  The findings suggest that video clinics are equally effective in managing suspected nasal bone injuries and should not be restricted to emergency situations. However, it is advisable to adopt a balanced approach considering the additional costs associated with appointments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13731,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology\",\"volume\":\"29 2\",\"pages\":\"1-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12020573/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1801313\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1801313","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们之前研究了视频诊所对2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间闭合性鼻骨损伤管理的影响。该研究的目的是评估在家中或工作场所对患者进行管理的可行性,并指导他们在下一个工作日前往门诊诊所,如果他们怀疑有任何偏差或鼻腔气流减少,以进行进一步评估。目的采用与本研究相同的标准,将本研究结果与传统的面对面鼻部损伤临床结果进行比较。方法对3个月的视频门诊资料和6个月的面对面门诊资料进行分析。我们收集了患者数量的信息,按年龄和性别分类,以及错过预约的记录(dna)和鼻腔操作的要求。数据分析在SciPy Python 3.0(开源)中使用Chi-Squared检验。结果两组在18岁以下和18岁以上闭合性鼻骨损伤患者数量(p值:0.961)、失诊率(p值:0.0734)、骨折复位需求(p值:0.0734)方面差异均无统计学意义。结论视频门诊在治疗疑似鼻骨损伤方面同样有效,不应局限于急诊情况。但是,考虑到与任用有关的额外费用,最好采取一种平衡的办法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Video Clinics for Nasal Bone Injuries in COVID Times - Is it a Valid Tool for Routine Practice?

Introduction  We previously investigated the impact of video clinics on the management of closed nasal bone injuries during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The aim of that study was to assess the feasibility of managing patients at their homes or workplaces, with instructions to attend outpatient clinics the next working day if they suspected any deviation or reduced nasal airflow, for further evaluation. Objective  To compare the results of our previous research with the traditional, in-person nasal injury clinics, using the same criteria as in our prior investigation. Methods  We analyzed 3 months of preexisting data from video clinics and collected 6 months of data from face-to-face clinics. We gathered information on the number of patients, categorized by age and gender, as well as records of missed appointments (DNAs) and the requirement for nasal manipulations. Data analysis was conducted using the Chi-Squared test in SciPy Python 3.0 (open source). Results  The statistical analysis revealed no significant differences between the 2 groups concerning the number of patients with closed nasal bone injuries, both under and over 18 years of age ( p -value: 0.961), the rate of missed appointments ( p -value: 0.0734), and the need for fracture reduction ( p -value: 0.0734). Conclusions  The findings suggest that video clinics are equally effective in managing suspected nasal bone injuries and should not be restricted to emergency situations. However, it is advisable to adopt a balanced approach considering the additional costs associated with appointments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信