以利福霉素为基础的麻风暴露后化学预防的有效性、安全性和可行性综述。

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Patrick O Campbell, Nicholas M Douglas, Stephen T Chambers
{"title":"以利福霉素为基础的麻风暴露后化学预防的有效性、安全性和可行性综述。","authors":"Patrick O Campbell, Nicholas M Douglas, Stephen T Chambers","doi":"10.3390/tropicalmed10040084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 2021, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended scaling up leprosy prevention activities, including chemoprophylaxis, as one of the pillars of their 'Towards Zero Leprosy' strategy. This recommendation was primarily based on a 57% overall reduction in leprosy incidence among contacts who received chemoprophylaxis in the COLEP study conducted in Bangladesh. Since this landmark study, further research on the efficacy, feasibility, and implementation of leprosy chemoprophylaxis has been conducted. Additionally, concerns have been raised regarding the strength of evidence supporting the overall benefit of chemoprophylaxis and the potential for propagation of drug resistance in <i>M. leprae</i> strains. This literature review presents the current evidence for the efficacy and safety of rifamycin-based chemoprophylaxis in preventing clinical disease, and the feasibility of implementing chemoprophylaxis programmes. Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) has a reported efficacy of 45-80%, depending on the degree of case contact, the classification of the index case, the selected chemoprophylaxis regimen, the geographical setting, childhood BCG coverage and the implementation approach. As an intervention, it appears to be feasible, cost-effective, and acceptable to patients, contacts, and healthcare staff, with minimal harm. Implementation strategies need to be tailored to specific epidemiological and sociocultural settings for maximal benefit. Further research is required to optimise PEP regimens and strategies in various epidemiological settings and to assess the impact of these programmes on the susceptibility profile of local <i>M. leprae</i> strains.</p>","PeriodicalId":23330,"journal":{"name":"Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease","volume":"10 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12030903/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Review of the Efficacy, Safety, and Feasibility of Rifamycin-Based Post-Exposure Chemoprophylaxis for Leprosy.\",\"authors\":\"Patrick O Campbell, Nicholas M Douglas, Stephen T Chambers\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/tropicalmed10040084\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In 2021, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended scaling up leprosy prevention activities, including chemoprophylaxis, as one of the pillars of their 'Towards Zero Leprosy' strategy. This recommendation was primarily based on a 57% overall reduction in leprosy incidence among contacts who received chemoprophylaxis in the COLEP study conducted in Bangladesh. Since this landmark study, further research on the efficacy, feasibility, and implementation of leprosy chemoprophylaxis has been conducted. Additionally, concerns have been raised regarding the strength of evidence supporting the overall benefit of chemoprophylaxis and the potential for propagation of drug resistance in <i>M. leprae</i> strains. This literature review presents the current evidence for the efficacy and safety of rifamycin-based chemoprophylaxis in preventing clinical disease, and the feasibility of implementing chemoprophylaxis programmes. Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) has a reported efficacy of 45-80%, depending on the degree of case contact, the classification of the index case, the selected chemoprophylaxis regimen, the geographical setting, childhood BCG coverage and the implementation approach. As an intervention, it appears to be feasible, cost-effective, and acceptable to patients, contacts, and healthcare staff, with minimal harm. Implementation strategies need to be tailored to specific epidemiological and sociocultural settings for maximal benefit. Further research is required to optimise PEP regimens and strategies in various epidemiological settings and to assess the impact of these programmes on the susceptibility profile of local <i>M. leprae</i> strains.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease\",\"volume\":\"10 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12030903/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed10040084\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed10040084","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2021年,世界卫生组织(世卫组织)建议扩大麻风预防活动,包括化学预防,作为其“实现零麻风”战略的支柱之一。这一建议主要基于在孟加拉国进行的COLEP研究中,接受化学预防的接触者麻风病发病率总体降低了57%。自这项具有里程碑意义的研究以来,对麻风化学预防的疗效、可行性和实施进行了进一步的研究。此外,人们还对支持化学预防的总体益处的证据力度以及麻风分枝杆菌菌株中耐药性传播的可能性表示关注。这篇文献综述介绍了目前基于利福霉素的化学预防在预防临床疾病方面的有效性和安全性,以及实施化学预防方案的可行性。据报道,暴露后预防(PEP)的有效性为45-80%,这取决于病例接触程度、指示病例分类、所选择的化学预防方案、地理环境、儿童卡介苗覆盖率和实施方法。作为一种干预措施,它似乎是可行的、具有成本效益的,并且为患者、接触者和医护人员所接受,危害最小。实施战略需要根据具体的流行病学和社会文化环境进行调整,以获得最大利益。需要进一步的研究来优化各种流行病学环境下的PEP方案和策略,并评估这些规划对当地麻风分枝杆菌菌株易感谱的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Review of the Efficacy, Safety, and Feasibility of Rifamycin-Based Post-Exposure Chemoprophylaxis for Leprosy.

In 2021, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended scaling up leprosy prevention activities, including chemoprophylaxis, as one of the pillars of their 'Towards Zero Leprosy' strategy. This recommendation was primarily based on a 57% overall reduction in leprosy incidence among contacts who received chemoprophylaxis in the COLEP study conducted in Bangladesh. Since this landmark study, further research on the efficacy, feasibility, and implementation of leprosy chemoprophylaxis has been conducted. Additionally, concerns have been raised regarding the strength of evidence supporting the overall benefit of chemoprophylaxis and the potential for propagation of drug resistance in M. leprae strains. This literature review presents the current evidence for the efficacy and safety of rifamycin-based chemoprophylaxis in preventing clinical disease, and the feasibility of implementing chemoprophylaxis programmes. Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) has a reported efficacy of 45-80%, depending on the degree of case contact, the classification of the index case, the selected chemoprophylaxis regimen, the geographical setting, childhood BCG coverage and the implementation approach. As an intervention, it appears to be feasible, cost-effective, and acceptable to patients, contacts, and healthcare staff, with minimal harm. Implementation strategies need to be tailored to specific epidemiological and sociocultural settings for maximal benefit. Further research is required to optimise PEP regimens and strategies in various epidemiological settings and to assess the impact of these programmes on the susceptibility profile of local M. leprae strains.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease
Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
10.30%
发文量
353
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信