诱导-同步(化疗)放疗对鼻咽癌风险分层的血浆eb病毒DNA时间清除模式

IF 6.4 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Zongwei Huang, Ying Li, Wenxi Wu, Lishui Wu, Zihan Chen, Siqi Xu, Yi Li, Jinghua Lai, Sufang Qiu, Jun Lu
{"title":"诱导-同步(化疗)放疗对鼻咽癌风险分层的血浆eb病毒DNA时间清除模式","authors":"Zongwei Huang, Ying Li, Wenxi Wu, Lishui Wu, Zihan Chen, Siqi Xu, Yi Li, Jinghua Lai, Sufang Qiu, Jun Lu","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.03.076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Plasma Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA is a widely used biomarker for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Prior investigations predominantly assessed EBV DNA at a single time point, thus neglecting the differential prognostic implications of the temporal clearance pattern of EBV DNA during induction-concurrent (chemo)radiation therapy (RT).</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed EBV DNA clearance patterns during induction-concurrent chemoRT in newly diagnosed patients with nonmetastatic NPC. EBV DNA was tested at 3 time points (baseline [T0], end of induction chemotherapy [T1], and end of RT [T2]) and recorded as detectable (D) and undetectable (U). The association between EBV DNA pattern and progression-free survival was analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2203 NPCs were included. Five distinct EBV DNA trajectory patterns were identified: type Ⅰ (negative-stable, U-U-U, 7.3%), type Ⅱ (induction chemotherapy-elimination, D-U-U, 42.8%), type Ⅲ (RT-elimination, D-D-U, 35.0%), type Ⅳ (persistent-positive, D-D-D, 11.7%), and type Ⅴ (resurgence, D-U-D [1.5%], U-D-U [1.2%], U-D-D [0.4%], or U-U-D [0.2%]). The median follow-up was 53.5 months (IQR, 43.1-66.9). Type Ⅱ patients displayed superior 5-year progression-free survival (82.9% [95% CI, 80.4%-85.5%]) versus type Ⅲ (75.9% [72.8%-79.1%], P < .001), type Ⅳ (52.5% [46.4%-59.5%], P < .001), and type Ⅴ (72.5% [62.2%-84.6%], P = .028). The 5-year progression-free survival for type V patients with \"D-U-D,\" \"U-D-U,\" \"U-D-D,\" and \"U-U-D\" patterns was 62.4% (46.2%-84.3%), 78.6% (63.1%-97.8%), 85.7% (63.3%-100.0%), and 75.0% (42.6%-100.0%), respectively. All 33 patients with the \"D-U-D\" pattern had stage Ⅲ-Ⅳ disease at diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Temporal EBV DNA clearance patterns during induction-concurrent chemoRT provide valuable prognostic insights, enabling the identification of patients with high-risk NPC and informing personalized treatment strategies. Resurgence of EBV DNA may occur occasionally (3.3%). Caution is required when considering reduced-intensity therapy in patients with locoeregionally advanced disease when EBV DNA becomes U after induction chemotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Plasma Epstein-Barr Virus DNA Temporal Clearance Pattern During Induction-Concurrent (Chemo)Radiation Therapy for Risk Stratification in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.\",\"authors\":\"Zongwei Huang, Ying Li, Wenxi Wu, Lishui Wu, Zihan Chen, Siqi Xu, Yi Li, Jinghua Lai, Sufang Qiu, Jun Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.03.076\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Plasma Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA is a widely used biomarker for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Prior investigations predominantly assessed EBV DNA at a single time point, thus neglecting the differential prognostic implications of the temporal clearance pattern of EBV DNA during induction-concurrent (chemo)radiation therapy (RT).</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed EBV DNA clearance patterns during induction-concurrent chemoRT in newly diagnosed patients with nonmetastatic NPC. EBV DNA was tested at 3 time points (baseline [T0], end of induction chemotherapy [T1], and end of RT [T2]) and recorded as detectable (D) and undetectable (U). The association between EBV DNA pattern and progression-free survival was analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2203 NPCs were included. Five distinct EBV DNA trajectory patterns were identified: type Ⅰ (negative-stable, U-U-U, 7.3%), type Ⅱ (induction chemotherapy-elimination, D-U-U, 42.8%), type Ⅲ (RT-elimination, D-D-U, 35.0%), type Ⅳ (persistent-positive, D-D-D, 11.7%), and type Ⅴ (resurgence, D-U-D [1.5%], U-D-U [1.2%], U-D-D [0.4%], or U-U-D [0.2%]). The median follow-up was 53.5 months (IQR, 43.1-66.9). Type Ⅱ patients displayed superior 5-year progression-free survival (82.9% [95% CI, 80.4%-85.5%]) versus type Ⅲ (75.9% [72.8%-79.1%], P < .001), type Ⅳ (52.5% [46.4%-59.5%], P < .001), and type Ⅴ (72.5% [62.2%-84.6%], P = .028). The 5-year progression-free survival for type V patients with \\\"D-U-D,\\\" \\\"U-D-U,\\\" \\\"U-D-D,\\\" and \\\"U-U-D\\\" patterns was 62.4% (46.2%-84.3%), 78.6% (63.1%-97.8%), 85.7% (63.3%-100.0%), and 75.0% (42.6%-100.0%), respectively. All 33 patients with the \\\"D-U-D\\\" pattern had stage Ⅲ-Ⅳ disease at diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Temporal EBV DNA clearance patterns during induction-concurrent chemoRT provide valuable prognostic insights, enabling the identification of patients with high-risk NPC and informing personalized treatment strategies. Resurgence of EBV DNA may occur occasionally (3.3%). Caution is required when considering reduced-intensity therapy in patients with locoeregionally advanced disease when EBV DNA becomes U after induction chemotherapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.03.076\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.03.076","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:血浆eb病毒(EBV) DNA是鼻咽癌(NPC)广泛应用的生物标志物。先前的研究主要在单个时间点评估EBV DNA,从而忽略了诱导-同步(化疗)放射治疗(RT)期间EBV DNA时间清除模式的差异预后意义。方法和材料:我们回顾性地回顾了新诊断的非转移性鼻咽癌患者在诱导-同步化疗期间EBV DNA清除模式。在3个时间点(基线[T0]、诱导化疗结束[T1]和放疗结束[T2])检测EBV DNA,记录为可检测(D)和不可检测(U)。分析EBV DNA模式与无进展生存期之间的关系。结果:共纳入2203名npc。鉴定出五种不同的EBV DNA轨迹模式:Ⅰ型(负稳定型,U-U-U, 7.3%)、Ⅱ型(诱导化疗消除型,D-U-U, 42.8%)、Ⅲ型(rt消除型,D-D-U, 35.0%)、Ⅳ型(持续阳性,D-D-D, 11.7%)和Ⅴ型(复发型,D-U-D[1.5%]、U-D-U[1.2%]、U-D-D[0.4%]或U-U-D[0.2%])。中位随访时间为53.5个月(IQR为43.1-66.9)。Ⅱ型患者的5年无进展生存率(82.9% [95% CI, 80.4%-85.5%])高于Ⅲ型(75.9% [72.8%-79.1%],P < .001)、Ⅳ型(52.5% [46.4%-59.5%],P < .001)和Ⅴ型(72.5% [62.2%-84.6%],P = .028)。“D-U-D”、“U-D-U”、“U-D-D”和“U-U-D”型V型患者的5年无进展生存率分别为62.4%(46.2% ~ 84.3%)、78.6%(63.1% ~ 97.8%)、85.7%(63.3% ~ 100.0%)和75.0%(42.6% ~ 100.0%)。所有33例“D-U-D”型患者在诊断时均为Ⅲ-Ⅳ期疾病。结论:诱导同步化疗期间的时间EBV DNA清除模式提供了有价值的预后见解,能够识别高危鼻咽癌患者并为个性化治疗策略提供信息。eb病毒DNA偶尔会再次出现(3.3%)。当EBV DNA在诱导化疗后变为U时,局部区域晚期疾病患者在考虑降低强度治疗时需要谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Plasma Epstein-Barr Virus DNA Temporal Clearance Pattern During Induction-Concurrent (Chemo)Radiation Therapy for Risk Stratification in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

Purpose: Plasma Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA is a widely used biomarker for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Prior investigations predominantly assessed EBV DNA at a single time point, thus neglecting the differential prognostic implications of the temporal clearance pattern of EBV DNA during induction-concurrent (chemo)radiation therapy (RT).

Methods and materials: We retrospectively reviewed EBV DNA clearance patterns during induction-concurrent chemoRT in newly diagnosed patients with nonmetastatic NPC. EBV DNA was tested at 3 time points (baseline [T0], end of induction chemotherapy [T1], and end of RT [T2]) and recorded as detectable (D) and undetectable (U). The association between EBV DNA pattern and progression-free survival was analyzed.

Results: A total of 2203 NPCs were included. Five distinct EBV DNA trajectory patterns were identified: type Ⅰ (negative-stable, U-U-U, 7.3%), type Ⅱ (induction chemotherapy-elimination, D-U-U, 42.8%), type Ⅲ (RT-elimination, D-D-U, 35.0%), type Ⅳ (persistent-positive, D-D-D, 11.7%), and type Ⅴ (resurgence, D-U-D [1.5%], U-D-U [1.2%], U-D-D [0.4%], or U-U-D [0.2%]). The median follow-up was 53.5 months (IQR, 43.1-66.9). Type Ⅱ patients displayed superior 5-year progression-free survival (82.9% [95% CI, 80.4%-85.5%]) versus type Ⅲ (75.9% [72.8%-79.1%], P < .001), type Ⅳ (52.5% [46.4%-59.5%], P < .001), and type Ⅴ (72.5% [62.2%-84.6%], P = .028). The 5-year progression-free survival for type V patients with "D-U-D," "U-D-U," "U-D-D," and "U-U-D" patterns was 62.4% (46.2%-84.3%), 78.6% (63.1%-97.8%), 85.7% (63.3%-100.0%), and 75.0% (42.6%-100.0%), respectively. All 33 patients with the "D-U-D" pattern had stage Ⅲ-Ⅳ disease at diagnosis.

Conclusions: Temporal EBV DNA clearance patterns during induction-concurrent chemoRT provide valuable prognostic insights, enabling the identification of patients with high-risk NPC and informing personalized treatment strategies. Resurgence of EBV DNA may occur occasionally (3.3%). Caution is required when considering reduced-intensity therapy in patients with locoeregionally advanced disease when EBV DNA becomes U after induction chemotherapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
2538
审稿时长
6.6 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics (IJROBP), known in the field as the Red Journal, publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to radiation oncology, radiation biology, medical physics, and both education and health policy as it relates to the field. This journal has a particular interest in original contributions of the following types: prospective clinical trials, outcomes research, and large database interrogation. In addition, it seeks reports of high-impact innovations in single or combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization, normal tissue protection (including both precision avoidance and pharmacologic means), brachytherapy, particle irradiation, and cancer imaging. Technical advances related to dosimetry and conformal radiation treatment planning are of interest, as are basic science studies investigating tumor physiology and the molecular biology underlying cancer and normal tissue radiation response.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信