“动态肠道”的一致性如何?三种啮齿类动物对膳食纤维和蛋白质的复杂生理反应。

IF 2.8 2区 生物学 Q2 BIOLOGY
Kevin D Kohl, Nick Barts, Karen Peralta Martínez, Anna Lackey, Emily Lyons, Matthew J Maier, Maya Maurer, Domenique Tripoli, Tate Yawitz, Rodolfo Martínez-Mota, Bret Pasch, M Denise Dearing, Brian K Trevelline
{"title":"“动态肠道”的一致性如何?三种啮齿类动物对膳食纤维和蛋白质的复杂生理反应。","authors":"Kevin D Kohl, Nick Barts, Karen Peralta Martínez, Anna Lackey, Emily Lyons, Matthew J Maier, Maya Maurer, Domenique Tripoli, Tate Yawitz, Rodolfo Martínez-Mota, Bret Pasch, M Denise Dearing, Brian K Trevelline","doi":"10.1242/jeb.249797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To efficiently digest food resources that may vary spatially and temporally, animals maintain physiological flexibility across levels of organization. For example, in response to dietary shifts, animals may exhibit changes in the expression of digestive enzymes, sizes of digestive organs, or the structure of their gut microbiome. A 'Grand Challenge' in comparative physiology is to understand how components of flexibility across organizational levels may scale to cumulatively determine organismal performance. Here, we conducted feeding trials on three rodent species with disparate feeding strategies: herbivorous montane voles (Microtus montanus), omnivorous white-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus), and carnivorous grasshopper mice (Onychomys torridus). For each species, four groups of individuals were presented with diets that varied in carbohydrate, fiber, and protein content. After 4-5 weeks, we measured organismal performance in the form of nutrient digestibility (dry matter, nitrogen, fiber). We also measured gut anatomy, organ sizes, and conducted enzyme assays on various tissues to measure activities of carbohydrases and peptidases. We found some shared physiological responses e.g., fiber generally increased gut size across species. However, the specifics of these responses were distinct across species, suggesting different capacity for flexibility. Thus, in the context of digestion, we still lack an understanding of how flexibility across organizational levels may scale to determine whole animal performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":15786,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How consistent is 'the dynamic gut'?: Complex physiological responses to dietary fiber and protein across three rodent species.\",\"authors\":\"Kevin D Kohl, Nick Barts, Karen Peralta Martínez, Anna Lackey, Emily Lyons, Matthew J Maier, Maya Maurer, Domenique Tripoli, Tate Yawitz, Rodolfo Martínez-Mota, Bret Pasch, M Denise Dearing, Brian K Trevelline\",\"doi\":\"10.1242/jeb.249797\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To efficiently digest food resources that may vary spatially and temporally, animals maintain physiological flexibility across levels of organization. For example, in response to dietary shifts, animals may exhibit changes in the expression of digestive enzymes, sizes of digestive organs, or the structure of their gut microbiome. A 'Grand Challenge' in comparative physiology is to understand how components of flexibility across organizational levels may scale to cumulatively determine organismal performance. Here, we conducted feeding trials on three rodent species with disparate feeding strategies: herbivorous montane voles (Microtus montanus), omnivorous white-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus), and carnivorous grasshopper mice (Onychomys torridus). For each species, four groups of individuals were presented with diets that varied in carbohydrate, fiber, and protein content. After 4-5 weeks, we measured organismal performance in the form of nutrient digestibility (dry matter, nitrogen, fiber). We also measured gut anatomy, organ sizes, and conducted enzyme assays on various tissues to measure activities of carbohydrases and peptidases. We found some shared physiological responses e.g., fiber generally increased gut size across species. However, the specifics of these responses were distinct across species, suggesting different capacity for flexibility. Thus, in the context of digestion, we still lack an understanding of how flexibility across organizational levels may scale to determine whole animal performance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15786,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Biology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.249797\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.249797","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了有效地消化可能在空间和时间上变化的食物资源,动物在组织水平上保持生理灵活性。例如,为了应对饮食的变化,动物可能会表现出消化酶表达、消化器官大小或肠道微生物群结构的变化。比较生理学的一个“大挑战”是理解跨组织层面的灵活性组成部分如何累积决定组织绩效。在这里,我们对三种不同摄食策略的啮齿动物进行了摄食试验:草食性山地田鼠(Microtus montanus)、杂食性白足鼠(Peromyscus leucopus)和肉食性蚱蜢鼠(Onychomys torridus)。对于每个物种,四组个体提供了碳水化合物、纤维和蛋白质含量不同的饮食。4-5周后,我们以营养物质消化率(干物质、氮、纤维)的形式测量了机体性能。我们还测量了肠道解剖,器官大小,并对各种组织进行酶分析以测量糖酶和肽酶的活性。我们发现了一些共同的生理反应,例如,纤维通常会增加物种的肠道大小。然而,这些反应的细节在不同物种之间是不同的,这表明不同的灵活性。因此,在消化的背景下,我们仍然缺乏对跨组织水平的灵活性如何影响整个动物生产性能的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How consistent is 'the dynamic gut'?: Complex physiological responses to dietary fiber and protein across three rodent species.

To efficiently digest food resources that may vary spatially and temporally, animals maintain physiological flexibility across levels of organization. For example, in response to dietary shifts, animals may exhibit changes in the expression of digestive enzymes, sizes of digestive organs, or the structure of their gut microbiome. A 'Grand Challenge' in comparative physiology is to understand how components of flexibility across organizational levels may scale to cumulatively determine organismal performance. Here, we conducted feeding trials on three rodent species with disparate feeding strategies: herbivorous montane voles (Microtus montanus), omnivorous white-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus), and carnivorous grasshopper mice (Onychomys torridus). For each species, four groups of individuals were presented with diets that varied in carbohydrate, fiber, and protein content. After 4-5 weeks, we measured organismal performance in the form of nutrient digestibility (dry matter, nitrogen, fiber). We also measured gut anatomy, organ sizes, and conducted enzyme assays on various tissues to measure activities of carbohydrases and peptidases. We found some shared physiological responses e.g., fiber generally increased gut size across species. However, the specifics of these responses were distinct across species, suggesting different capacity for flexibility. Thus, in the context of digestion, we still lack an understanding of how flexibility across organizational levels may scale to determine whole animal performance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
10.70%
发文量
494
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Experimental Biology is the leading primary research journal in comparative physiology and publishes papers on the form and function of living organisms at all levels of biological organisation, from the molecular and subcellular to the integrated whole animal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信