柠檬酸对溶藻弧菌和霍乱弧菌生存力、膜损伤、外排泵活性和生长恢复的影响。

IF 2.1 4区 农林科学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
José Eduardo Lucero-Mejía , Angélica Godínez-Oviedo , Adrián Gómez-Baltazar , Sergio de Jesús Romero-Gómez , Ma. Soledad Vázquez-Garcidueñas , Gerardo Vázquez-Marrufo , Montserrat Hernández-Iturriaga
{"title":"柠檬酸对溶藻弧菌和霍乱弧菌生存力、膜损伤、外排泵活性和生长恢复的影响。","authors":"José Eduardo Lucero-Mejía ,&nbsp;Angélica Godínez-Oviedo ,&nbsp;Adrián Gómez-Baltazar ,&nbsp;Sergio de Jesús Romero-Gómez ,&nbsp;Ma. Soledad Vázquez-Garcidueñas ,&nbsp;Gerardo Vázquez-Marrufo ,&nbsp;Montserrat Hernández-Iturriaga","doi":"10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Citric acid, a common food ingredient, can induce cellular stress in foodborne pathogens, potentially affecting their viability and recovery. This study evaluated the physiological responses of <em>Vibrio alginolyticus</em> and <em>Vibrio cholerae</em> cells in logarithmic and stationary growth phases after exposure to citric acid at pH 4.5, 5.0, and 5.5 for 60, 120, and 180 min. After exposure, viability, membrane damage, efflux pump activity, and recovery were evaluated. Culture media type and growth phase had no significant effect on cell viability (<em>p</em> &gt; 0.05). <em>V. cholerae</em> strains were more sensitive to citric acid than <em>V. alginolyticus</em> strains, with a slight reduction (0.5 log CFU/mL) after 180 min of citric acid exposure (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). Membrane damage was greater in stationary-phase cells than in logarithmic-phase cells after 60 min, whereas efflux pump activity increased over time and was independent of the growth phase (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). Regardless of pH, cells exposed to citric acid for 60 min had longer detection times (7.92 ± 0.7 h) compared to those exposed for 180 min (6.68 ± 1.45 h), and cells grew faster at high pH values and at lower exposure time (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). Overall, citric acid induced mild sublethal damage in both <em>V. alginolyticus</em> and <em>V. cholerae</em>, with cell recovery primarily attributed to efflux pump activity. These results provide valuable insights into the risk associated with <em>Vibrio</em> cells under mild citric acid stress, a condition similar to that occurring during the preparation of raw fish dishes marinated in lemon juice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of food protection","volume":"88 7","pages":"Article 100534"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Citric Acid on Viability, Membrane Damage, Efflux Pump Activity, and Growth Recovery of Vibrio alginolyticus and Vibrio cholerae Strains\",\"authors\":\"José Eduardo Lucero-Mejía ,&nbsp;Angélica Godínez-Oviedo ,&nbsp;Adrián Gómez-Baltazar ,&nbsp;Sergio de Jesús Romero-Gómez ,&nbsp;Ma. Soledad Vázquez-Garcidueñas ,&nbsp;Gerardo Vázquez-Marrufo ,&nbsp;Montserrat Hernández-Iturriaga\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100534\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Citric acid, a common food ingredient, can induce cellular stress in foodborne pathogens, potentially affecting their viability and recovery. This study evaluated the physiological responses of <em>Vibrio alginolyticus</em> and <em>Vibrio cholerae</em> cells in logarithmic and stationary growth phases after exposure to citric acid at pH 4.5, 5.0, and 5.5 for 60, 120, and 180 min. After exposure, viability, membrane damage, efflux pump activity, and recovery were evaluated. Culture media type and growth phase had no significant effect on cell viability (<em>p</em> &gt; 0.05). <em>V. cholerae</em> strains were more sensitive to citric acid than <em>V. alginolyticus</em> strains, with a slight reduction (0.5 log CFU/mL) after 180 min of citric acid exposure (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). Membrane damage was greater in stationary-phase cells than in logarithmic-phase cells after 60 min, whereas efflux pump activity increased over time and was independent of the growth phase (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). Regardless of pH, cells exposed to citric acid for 60 min had longer detection times (7.92 ± 0.7 h) compared to those exposed for 180 min (6.68 ± 1.45 h), and cells grew faster at high pH values and at lower exposure time (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). Overall, citric acid induced mild sublethal damage in both <em>V. alginolyticus</em> and <em>V. cholerae</em>, with cell recovery primarily attributed to efflux pump activity. These results provide valuable insights into the risk associated with <em>Vibrio</em> cells under mild citric acid stress, a condition similar to that occurring during the preparation of raw fish dishes marinated in lemon juice.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of food protection\",\"volume\":\"88 7\",\"pages\":\"Article 100534\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of food protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X25000869\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of food protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0362028X25000869","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

柠檬酸是一种常见的食品成分,可诱导食源性病原体的细胞应激,潜在地影响它们的生存和恢复。本研究评估了溶藻弧菌和霍乱弧菌细胞在pH为4.5、5.0和5.5的柠檬酸环境中暴露60、120和180分钟后,在对数生长期和固定生长期的生理反应。暴露后,评估了活力、膜损伤、外排泵活性和恢复情况。培养基类型和生长期对细胞存活率无显著影响(p < 0.05)。与溶藻弧菌相比,霍乱弧菌对柠檬酸更敏感,暴露于柠檬酸180 min后略有下降(0.5 log CFU/mL)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Citric Acid on Viability, Membrane Damage, Efflux Pump Activity, and Growth Recovery of Vibrio alginolyticus and Vibrio cholerae Strains
Citric acid, a common food ingredient, can induce cellular stress in foodborne pathogens, potentially affecting their viability and recovery. This study evaluated the physiological responses of Vibrio alginolyticus and Vibrio cholerae cells in logarithmic and stationary growth phases after exposure to citric acid at pH 4.5, 5.0, and 5.5 for 60, 120, and 180 min. After exposure, viability, membrane damage, efflux pump activity, and recovery were evaluated. Culture media type and growth phase had no significant effect on cell viability (p > 0.05). V. cholerae strains were more sensitive to citric acid than V. alginolyticus strains, with a slight reduction (0.5 log CFU/mL) after 180 min of citric acid exposure (p < 0.05). Membrane damage was greater in stationary-phase cells than in logarithmic-phase cells after 60 min, whereas efflux pump activity increased over time and was independent of the growth phase (p < 0.05). Regardless of pH, cells exposed to citric acid for 60 min had longer detection times (7.92 ± 0.7 h) compared to those exposed for 180 min (6.68 ± 1.45 h), and cells grew faster at high pH values and at lower exposure time (p < 0.05). Overall, citric acid induced mild sublethal damage in both V. alginolyticus and V. cholerae, with cell recovery primarily attributed to efflux pump activity. These results provide valuable insights into the risk associated with Vibrio cells under mild citric acid stress, a condition similar to that occurring during the preparation of raw fish dishes marinated in lemon juice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of food protection
Journal of food protection 工程技术-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
296
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Food Protection® (JFP) is an international, monthly scientific journal in the English language published by the International Association for Food Protection (IAFP). JFP publishes research and review articles on all aspects of food protection and safety. Major emphases of JFP are placed on studies dealing with: Tracking, detecting (including traditional, molecular, and real-time), inactivating, and controlling food-related hazards, including microorganisms (including antibiotic resistance), microbial (mycotoxins, seafood toxins) and non-microbial toxins (heavy metals, pesticides, veterinary drug residues, migrants from food packaging, and processing contaminants), allergens and pests (insects, rodents) in human food, pet food and animal feed throughout the food chain; Microbiological food quality and traditional/novel methods to assay microbiological food quality; Prevention of food-related hazards and food spoilage through food preservatives and thermal/non-thermal processes, including process validation; Food fermentations and food-related probiotics; Safe food handling practices during pre-harvest, harvest, post-harvest, distribution and consumption, including food safety education for retailers, foodservice, and consumers; Risk assessments for food-related hazards; Economic impact of food-related hazards, foodborne illness, food loss, food spoilage, and adulterated foods; Food fraud, food authentication, food defense, and foodborne disease outbreak investigations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信