应用自适应光学扫描激光检眼镜评估优势眼与非优势眼的眼内分布差异。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Ying Chen, Huiling Ma, Huiyan Li, Xinyun Wang, Menghui Zhang, Sisi Liu, Xiawei Wang, Hongguang Cui
{"title":"应用自适应光学扫描激光检眼镜评估优势眼与非优势眼的眼内分布差异。","authors":"Ying Chen, Huiling Ma, Huiyan Li, Xinyun Wang, Menghui Zhang, Sisi Liu, Xiawei Wang, Hongguang Cui","doi":"10.1007/s00417-025-06852-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate distribution differences of parafoveal cone photoreceptors between dominant and non-dominant eyes using the adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscope (AO-SLO) system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 156 eyes from 78 healthy subjects, all of whom had best-corrected visual acuity of 20/20 or better in both eyes and underwent ophthalmological examinations. The dominant eye was determined using the hole-in-the-card test. Retinal cone photoreceptor observations were performed at an eccentricity of 3.0° from the foveal center using the AO-SLO system. Quantitative distribution parameters, including cone density, spacing, regularity, and dispersion of both dominant and non-dominant eyes, were analyzed and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Dominant eyes exhibited higher cone photoreceptors density at a 3.0° horizontal eccentricity from the fovea [22,896 (20,954, 25,179) cells/mm<sup>2</sup>] than non-dominant eyes [22,621 (20,147, 24,253) cells/mm<sup>2</sup>] (p = 0.03). Correspondingly, the spacing of cone photoreceptors in dominant eyes [5.41 (5.09, 5.68) µm] was smaller than that in non-dominant eyes [5.47 (5.23, 5.72) µm] (p = 0.041). The interocular difference in cone regularity between dominant [96.53 (95.07, 97.46)%] and non-dominant [96.68 (95.49, 97.57)%] eyes was statistically significant (p = 0.04). However, there was no significant interocular difference in cone dispersion, which could reflect distribution uniformity (p = 0.795).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings reveal that the dominant eye exhibits higher cone density in the parafoveal region with narrower spacing but a less regular arrangement than the non-dominant eye. These cytological features provide new evidence linking cone photoreceptor distribution to ocular dominance, which may account for the electrophysiological asymmetry observed between the two eyes.</p><p><strong>Key messages: </strong>What is known? • The adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscope can correct aberrations caused by irregularities in the eye's optics, allowing for the direct and noninvasive observation of retinal microstructures in vivo. What is new? • Our study reveals that parafoveal cone photoreceptors in dominant eyes exhibit significantly higher density, narrower spacing, and a less regular arrangement compared to those in non-dominant eyes in vivo. • The cytological asymmetry between photoreceptor cells in dominant and non-dominant eyes may serve as a potential basis for the electrophysiological differences observed between the two.</p>","PeriodicalId":12795,"journal":{"name":"Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interocular distribution differences of parafoveal cone photoreceptors between dominant and non-dominant eyes assessed using an adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscope.\",\"authors\":\"Ying Chen, Huiling Ma, Huiyan Li, Xinyun Wang, Menghui Zhang, Sisi Liu, Xiawei Wang, Hongguang Cui\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00417-025-06852-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate distribution differences of parafoveal cone photoreceptors between dominant and non-dominant eyes using the adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscope (AO-SLO) system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 156 eyes from 78 healthy subjects, all of whom had best-corrected visual acuity of 20/20 or better in both eyes and underwent ophthalmological examinations. The dominant eye was determined using the hole-in-the-card test. Retinal cone photoreceptor observations were performed at an eccentricity of 3.0° from the foveal center using the AO-SLO system. Quantitative distribution parameters, including cone density, spacing, regularity, and dispersion of both dominant and non-dominant eyes, were analyzed and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Dominant eyes exhibited higher cone photoreceptors density at a 3.0° horizontal eccentricity from the fovea [22,896 (20,954, 25,179) cells/mm<sup>2</sup>] than non-dominant eyes [22,621 (20,147, 24,253) cells/mm<sup>2</sup>] (p = 0.03). Correspondingly, the spacing of cone photoreceptors in dominant eyes [5.41 (5.09, 5.68) µm] was smaller than that in non-dominant eyes [5.47 (5.23, 5.72) µm] (p = 0.041). The interocular difference in cone regularity between dominant [96.53 (95.07, 97.46)%] and non-dominant [96.68 (95.49, 97.57)%] eyes was statistically significant (p = 0.04). However, there was no significant interocular difference in cone dispersion, which could reflect distribution uniformity (p = 0.795).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings reveal that the dominant eye exhibits higher cone density in the parafoveal region with narrower spacing but a less regular arrangement than the non-dominant eye. These cytological features provide new evidence linking cone photoreceptor distribution to ocular dominance, which may account for the electrophysiological asymmetry observed between the two eyes.</p><p><strong>Key messages: </strong>What is known? • The adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscope can correct aberrations caused by irregularities in the eye's optics, allowing for the direct and noninvasive observation of retinal microstructures in vivo. What is new? • Our study reveals that parafoveal cone photoreceptors in dominant eyes exhibit significantly higher density, narrower spacing, and a less regular arrangement compared to those in non-dominant eyes in vivo. • The cytological asymmetry between photoreceptor cells in dominant and non-dominant eyes may serve as a potential basis for the electrophysiological differences observed between the two.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-025-06852-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-025-06852-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:应用自适应光学扫描激光检眼镜(AO-SLO)系统研究优势眼和非优势眼的中央凹锥体光感受器分布差异。方法:本回顾性研究纳入78名健康受试者的156只眼,所有受试者双眼最佳矫正视力均在20/20及以上,并接受眼科检查。主视眼是通过卡片穿洞测试确定的。采用AO-SLO系统在距中央凹中心3.0°偏心位置观察视网膜锥状体光感受器。对优势眼和非优势眼的锥体密度、间距、规律性和分散性等定量分布参数进行了分析比较。结果:优势眼在距中央凹水平偏心3.0°时,锥体光感受器密度[22,896(20,954,25,179)个细胞/mm2]高于非优势眼[22,621(20,147,24,253)个细胞/mm2] (p = 0.03)。优势眼视锥体光感受器间距[5.41(5.09,5.68)µm]小于非优势眼视锥体光感受器间距[5.47(5.23,5.72)µm] (p = 0.041)。优势眼与非优势眼视锥规则性差异有统计学意义(p = 0.04)。优势眼与非优势眼视锥规则性差异有统计学意义(p = 0.04)。但视锥色散在眼间无显著差异,可反映分布均匀性(p = 0.795)。结论:与非优势眼相比,优势眼的中央凹区锥体密度更高,间距更窄,但排列更不规则。这些细胞学特征提供了新的证据,证明视锥光感受器的分布与眼优势有关,这可能解释了在两只眼睛之间观察到的电生理不对称。关键信息:什么是已知的?•自适应光学扫描激光检眼镜可以纠正由于眼睛光学不正常引起的像差,从而实现对体内视网膜微观结构的直接无创观察。有什么新鲜事吗?•我们的研究表明,与非优势眼相比,优势眼的旁中央凹锥体光感受器在体内表现出更高的密度、更窄的间距和更不规则的排列。•显性眼和非显性眼感光细胞之间的细胞学不对称可能是两者之间观察到的电生理差异的潜在基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interocular distribution differences of parafoveal cone photoreceptors between dominant and non-dominant eyes assessed using an adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscope.

Purpose: To investigate distribution differences of parafoveal cone photoreceptors between dominant and non-dominant eyes using the adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscope (AO-SLO) system.

Methods: This retrospective study included 156 eyes from 78 healthy subjects, all of whom had best-corrected visual acuity of 20/20 or better in both eyes and underwent ophthalmological examinations. The dominant eye was determined using the hole-in-the-card test. Retinal cone photoreceptor observations were performed at an eccentricity of 3.0° from the foveal center using the AO-SLO system. Quantitative distribution parameters, including cone density, spacing, regularity, and dispersion of both dominant and non-dominant eyes, were analyzed and compared.

Results: Dominant eyes exhibited higher cone photoreceptors density at a 3.0° horizontal eccentricity from the fovea [22,896 (20,954, 25,179) cells/mm2] than non-dominant eyes [22,621 (20,147, 24,253) cells/mm2] (p = 0.03). Correspondingly, the spacing of cone photoreceptors in dominant eyes [5.41 (5.09, 5.68) µm] was smaller than that in non-dominant eyes [5.47 (5.23, 5.72) µm] (p = 0.041). The interocular difference in cone regularity between dominant [96.53 (95.07, 97.46)%] and non-dominant [96.68 (95.49, 97.57)%] eyes was statistically significant (p = 0.04). However, there was no significant interocular difference in cone dispersion, which could reflect distribution uniformity (p = 0.795).

Conclusion: Our findings reveal that the dominant eye exhibits higher cone density in the parafoveal region with narrower spacing but a less regular arrangement than the non-dominant eye. These cytological features provide new evidence linking cone photoreceptor distribution to ocular dominance, which may account for the electrophysiological asymmetry observed between the two eyes.

Key messages: What is known? • The adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscope can correct aberrations caused by irregularities in the eye's optics, allowing for the direct and noninvasive observation of retinal microstructures in vivo. What is new? • Our study reveals that parafoveal cone photoreceptors in dominant eyes exhibit significantly higher density, narrower spacing, and a less regular arrangement compared to those in non-dominant eyes in vivo. • The cytological asymmetry between photoreceptor cells in dominant and non-dominant eyes may serve as a potential basis for the electrophysiological differences observed between the two.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
398
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Graefe''s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology is a distinguished international journal that presents original clinical reports and clini-cally relevant experimental studies. Founded in 1854 by Albrecht von Graefe to serve as a source of useful clinical information and a stimulus for discussion, the journal has published articles by leading ophthalmologists and vision research scientists for more than a century. With peer review by an international Editorial Board and prompt English-language publication, Graefe''s Archive provides rapid dissemination of clinical and clinically related experimental information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信