经颅直流电刺激和运动疗法治疗颈源性头痛:一项评估功能结局的随机对照试验。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
NeuroRehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-27 DOI:10.1177/10538135251325384
Kaiden Jobin, Ashley Smith, Christina Campbell, Siobhan Schabrun, Jean-Michel Galarneau, Kathryn J Schneider, Chantel T Debert
{"title":"经颅直流电刺激和运动疗法治疗颈源性头痛:一项评估功能结局的随机对照试验。","authors":"Kaiden Jobin, Ashley Smith, Christina Campbell, Siobhan Schabrun, Jean-Michel Galarneau, Kathryn J Schneider, Chantel T Debert","doi":"10.1177/10538135251325384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveThe objectives of this study were to evaluate functional outcomes of cervical motor control, strength and endurance following active transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) with exercise therapy (ET) compared to sham tDCS/+ET in patient with cervicogenic headache (CGH),DesignThis was a pilot sham-controlled, participant and assessor blinded, randomized controlled trial.MethodsThirty-two participants with CGH were randomized to active tDCS/+ET or sham tDCS/+ET. Participants completed 6-weeks of daily ET concurrently combined with 3 sessions per week of tDCS. Assessments included: craniocervical flexion test (mmHg), cervical isometric strength (N), cervical flexor and extensor endurance (seconds), and range of motion (degrees) pre-treatment, post-treatment, 6-weeks and 12-weeks post treatment. Linear mixed effect models evaluated group-time interactions at each follow-up while accounting for exercise program adherence and sex.ResultsThere were significant group-time interactions for activation scores on the craniocervical flexion test from pre-treatment to post-treatment (β = 1.571; 95%CI[0.155, 2.988]; p = 0.030), 6-weeks (β = 1.571; 95%CI[0.155, 2.988]; p = 0.030), and 12-weeks (β = 1.954; 95%CI[0.465, 3.443]; p = 0.011) favoring the active tDCS/+ET group.ConclusionsActive tDCS/+ET demonstrated significant benefits in deep cervical flexor motor control compared to sham tDCS/+ET that remained improved up to 12 weeks post-treatment. This suggests tDCS/+ET may improve of functional outcomes for patients with CGH.</p>","PeriodicalId":19717,"journal":{"name":"NeuroRehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"511-524"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12231782/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Treatment of Cervicogenic Headache with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Exercise Therapy: A Randomized Control Trial Evaluating Functional Outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Kaiden Jobin, Ashley Smith, Christina Campbell, Siobhan Schabrun, Jean-Michel Galarneau, Kathryn J Schneider, Chantel T Debert\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10538135251325384\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ObjectiveThe objectives of this study were to evaluate functional outcomes of cervical motor control, strength and endurance following active transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) with exercise therapy (ET) compared to sham tDCS/+ET in patient with cervicogenic headache (CGH),DesignThis was a pilot sham-controlled, participant and assessor blinded, randomized controlled trial.MethodsThirty-two participants with CGH were randomized to active tDCS/+ET or sham tDCS/+ET. Participants completed 6-weeks of daily ET concurrently combined with 3 sessions per week of tDCS. Assessments included: craniocervical flexion test (mmHg), cervical isometric strength (N), cervical flexor and extensor endurance (seconds), and range of motion (degrees) pre-treatment, post-treatment, 6-weeks and 12-weeks post treatment. Linear mixed effect models evaluated group-time interactions at each follow-up while accounting for exercise program adherence and sex.ResultsThere were significant group-time interactions for activation scores on the craniocervical flexion test from pre-treatment to post-treatment (β = 1.571; 95%CI[0.155, 2.988]; p = 0.030), 6-weeks (β = 1.571; 95%CI[0.155, 2.988]; p = 0.030), and 12-weeks (β = 1.954; 95%CI[0.465, 3.443]; p = 0.011) favoring the active tDCS/+ET group.ConclusionsActive tDCS/+ET demonstrated significant benefits in deep cervical flexor motor control compared to sham tDCS/+ET that remained improved up to 12 weeks post-treatment. This suggests tDCS/+ET may improve of functional outcomes for patients with CGH.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NeuroRehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"511-524\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12231782/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NeuroRehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538135251325384\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NeuroRehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538135251325384","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是评估颈源性头痛(CGH)患者在主动经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)联合运动疗法(ET)与假tDCS/+ET治疗后颈部运动控制、力量和耐力的功能结局。设计这是一项假对照、参与者和评估者盲法随机对照试验。方法32例CGH患者随机分为活动性tDCS/+ET组和假性tDCS/+ET组。参与者完成了为期6周的每日ET,同时每周进行3次tDCS。评估包括:颅颈屈曲试验(mmHg)、颈椎等长强度(N)、颈椎屈伸肌耐力(秒)和活动范围(度)治疗前、治疗后、治疗后6周和12周。线性混合效应模型评估了每次随访时的群体时间互动,同时考虑了锻炼计划的依从性和性别。结果治疗前与治疗后颅颈屈曲试验的激活评分存在显著的组时间交互作用(β = 1.571;95%可信区间(0.155,2.988);P = 0.030), 6周(β = 1.571;95%可信区间(0.155,2.988);P = 0.030)和12周(β = 1.954;95%可信区间(0.465,3.443);p = 0.011),有利于活跃tDCS/+ET组。结论与假tDCS/+ET相比,主动tDCS/+ET在深颈屈肌运动控制方面表现出显著的益处,后者在治疗后12周仍有改善。这表明tDCS/+ET可以改善CGH患者的功能结局。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Treatment of Cervicogenic Headache with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Exercise Therapy: A Randomized Control Trial Evaluating Functional Outcomes.

ObjectiveThe objectives of this study were to evaluate functional outcomes of cervical motor control, strength and endurance following active transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) with exercise therapy (ET) compared to sham tDCS/+ET in patient with cervicogenic headache (CGH),DesignThis was a pilot sham-controlled, participant and assessor blinded, randomized controlled trial.MethodsThirty-two participants with CGH were randomized to active tDCS/+ET or sham tDCS/+ET. Participants completed 6-weeks of daily ET concurrently combined with 3 sessions per week of tDCS. Assessments included: craniocervical flexion test (mmHg), cervical isometric strength (N), cervical flexor and extensor endurance (seconds), and range of motion (degrees) pre-treatment, post-treatment, 6-weeks and 12-weeks post treatment. Linear mixed effect models evaluated group-time interactions at each follow-up while accounting for exercise program adherence and sex.ResultsThere were significant group-time interactions for activation scores on the craniocervical flexion test from pre-treatment to post-treatment (β = 1.571; 95%CI[0.155, 2.988]; p = 0.030), 6-weeks (β = 1.571; 95%CI[0.155, 2.988]; p = 0.030), and 12-weeks (β = 1.954; 95%CI[0.465, 3.443]; p = 0.011) favoring the active tDCS/+ET group.ConclusionsActive tDCS/+ET demonstrated significant benefits in deep cervical flexor motor control compared to sham tDCS/+ET that remained improved up to 12 weeks post-treatment. This suggests tDCS/+ET may improve of functional outcomes for patients with CGH.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
NeuroRehabilitation
NeuroRehabilitation CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: NeuroRehabilitation, an international, interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal, publishes manuscripts focused on scientifically based, practical information relevant to all aspects of neurologic rehabilitation. We publish unsolicited papers detailing original work/research that covers the full life span and range of neurological disabilities including stroke, spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury, neuromuscular disease and other neurological disorders. We also publish thematically organized issues that focus on specific clinical disorders, types of therapy and age groups. Proposals for thematic issues and suggestions for issue editors are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信