N Cremaschini, B Hertel, A Singh, A Aertsens, F Cinti
{"title":"犬副肺肺叶切除术11例(2009-2023)。","authors":"N Cremaschini, B Hertel, A Singh, A Aertsens, F Cinti","doi":"10.1111/jsap.13866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe accessory lung lobectomy, via right or left intercostal thoracotomy, intraoperative and postoperative complications and outcome in a small population of dogs.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The medical records of 11 dogs that underwent accessory lung lobectomy at three veterinary institutions between 2009 and 2023 were reviewed. Signalment, history, physical examination, diagnostics, duration of hospitalisation, surgical approach, type of lobectomy, concurrent procedures, intraoperative and postoperative complications, duration of indwelling thoracic drain and short-term outcomes were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Dogs underwent accessory lung lobectomy either via right (n = 9) or left (n = 2) intercostal thoracotomy. Partial (n = 6) or total lobectomy (n = 5) with stapler devices (n = 10) or surgical ligation (n = 1) was performed. Histopathology was performed in ten of 11 dogs and was consistent with pneumonia due to an infectious process or a migrating vegetable foreign body (n = 5), pulmonary carcinoma (n = 2), severe chronic neutrophilic and macrophagic pleuropneumonia (n = 1), pulmonary bullae (n = 1) or blastomycosis infection (n = 1). Iatrogenic trauma to the left caudal lung lobe occurred in one dog via left intercostal thoracotomy. The mean duration of indwelling thoracic drain was 2.7 days (range 1 to 4). Complications occurred postoperatively in six dogs. In five of six cases, short-term postoperative complications were classified as minor and included wound infection (n = 1), cough (n = 1), dyspnoea (n = 1), adverse reaction to medication (n = 1) and inappetence (n = 1). One case developed a major complication, pneumothorax with dehiscence of the lobectomy site, and revision surgery was required. All dogs survived hospital discharge.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Accessory lung lobectomy is uncommon and can be performed either via left- or via right-sided intercostal thoracotomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":17062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Small Animal Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accessory lung lobectomy in dogs: 11 cases (2009-2023).\",\"authors\":\"N Cremaschini, B Hertel, A Singh, A Aertsens, F Cinti\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jsap.13866\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To describe accessory lung lobectomy, via right or left intercostal thoracotomy, intraoperative and postoperative complications and outcome in a small population of dogs.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The medical records of 11 dogs that underwent accessory lung lobectomy at three veterinary institutions between 2009 and 2023 were reviewed. Signalment, history, physical examination, diagnostics, duration of hospitalisation, surgical approach, type of lobectomy, concurrent procedures, intraoperative and postoperative complications, duration of indwelling thoracic drain and short-term outcomes were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Dogs underwent accessory lung lobectomy either via right (n = 9) or left (n = 2) intercostal thoracotomy. Partial (n = 6) or total lobectomy (n = 5) with stapler devices (n = 10) or surgical ligation (n = 1) was performed. Histopathology was performed in ten of 11 dogs and was consistent with pneumonia due to an infectious process or a migrating vegetable foreign body (n = 5), pulmonary carcinoma (n = 2), severe chronic neutrophilic and macrophagic pleuropneumonia (n = 1), pulmonary bullae (n = 1) or blastomycosis infection (n = 1). Iatrogenic trauma to the left caudal lung lobe occurred in one dog via left intercostal thoracotomy. The mean duration of indwelling thoracic drain was 2.7 days (range 1 to 4). Complications occurred postoperatively in six dogs. In five of six cases, short-term postoperative complications were classified as minor and included wound infection (n = 1), cough (n = 1), dyspnoea (n = 1), adverse reaction to medication (n = 1) and inappetence (n = 1). One case developed a major complication, pneumothorax with dehiscence of the lobectomy site, and revision surgery was required. All dogs survived hospital discharge.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Accessory lung lobectomy is uncommon and can be performed either via left- or via right-sided intercostal thoracotomy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Small Animal Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Small Animal Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jsap.13866\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Small Animal Practice","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jsap.13866","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Accessory lung lobectomy in dogs: 11 cases (2009-2023).
Objectives: To describe accessory lung lobectomy, via right or left intercostal thoracotomy, intraoperative and postoperative complications and outcome in a small population of dogs.
Materials and methods: The medical records of 11 dogs that underwent accessory lung lobectomy at three veterinary institutions between 2009 and 2023 were reviewed. Signalment, history, physical examination, diagnostics, duration of hospitalisation, surgical approach, type of lobectomy, concurrent procedures, intraoperative and postoperative complications, duration of indwelling thoracic drain and short-term outcomes were recorded.
Results: Dogs underwent accessory lung lobectomy either via right (n = 9) or left (n = 2) intercostal thoracotomy. Partial (n = 6) or total lobectomy (n = 5) with stapler devices (n = 10) or surgical ligation (n = 1) was performed. Histopathology was performed in ten of 11 dogs and was consistent with pneumonia due to an infectious process or a migrating vegetable foreign body (n = 5), pulmonary carcinoma (n = 2), severe chronic neutrophilic and macrophagic pleuropneumonia (n = 1), pulmonary bullae (n = 1) or blastomycosis infection (n = 1). Iatrogenic trauma to the left caudal lung lobe occurred in one dog via left intercostal thoracotomy. The mean duration of indwelling thoracic drain was 2.7 days (range 1 to 4). Complications occurred postoperatively in six dogs. In five of six cases, short-term postoperative complications were classified as minor and included wound infection (n = 1), cough (n = 1), dyspnoea (n = 1), adverse reaction to medication (n = 1) and inappetence (n = 1). One case developed a major complication, pneumothorax with dehiscence of the lobectomy site, and revision surgery was required. All dogs survived hospital discharge.
Clinical significance: Accessory lung lobectomy is uncommon and can be performed either via left- or via right-sided intercostal thoracotomy.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Small Animal Practice (JSAP) is a monthly peer-reviewed publication integrating clinical research papers and case reports from international sources, covering all aspects of medicine and surgery relating to dogs, cats and other small animals. These papers facilitate the dissemination and implementation of new ideas and techniques relating to clinical veterinary practice, with the ultimate aim of promoting best practice. JSAP publishes high quality original articles, as well as other scientific and educational information. New developments are placed in perspective, encompassing new concepts and peer commentary. The target audience is veterinarians primarily engaged in the practise of small animal medicine and surgery.
In addition to original articles, JSAP will publish invited editorials (relating to a manuscript in the same issue or a topic of current interest), review articles, which provide in-depth discussion of important clinical issues, and other scientific and educational information from around the world.
The final decision on publication of a manuscript rests with the Editorial Board and ultimately with the Editor. All papers, regardless of type, represent the opinion of the authors and not necessarily that of the Editor, the Association or the Publisher.
The Journal of Small Animal Practice is published on behalf of the British Small Animal Veterinary Association and is also the official scientific journal of the World Small Animal Veterinary Association