{"title":"三种不同的阻力运动方案后的肌肉酸痛和神经肌肉疲劳:男性和女性的比较。","authors":"Michela Margoni, Gianluca Bochicchio, Luca Ferrari, Silvia Pogliaghi","doi":"10.1519/JSC.0000000000005103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Margoni, M, Bochicchio, G, Ferrari, L, and Pogliaghi, S. Muscle soreness and neuromuscular fatigue after three different resistance exercise protocols: Comparison between men and women. J Strength Cond Res 39(6): 625-633, 2025-This study evaluated the sex-related differences in the magnitude and time course of muscle soreness and neuromuscular fatigue after 3 different resistance training (RT) protocols, in both the upper and lower body. Sixteen recreational resistance-trained women ( n = 7) and men ( n = 9) performed 3 RT protocols, in randomized order as either power (POW, 4 × 5 at 50% 1 repetition maximum [1RM]), strength (STR, 4 × 2 at 90% 1RM), and hypertrophy (4 × 10 at 70% 1RM), involving 2 main exercises (back squat and bench press) at aim-specific training load, and 4 complementary exercises. Visual analog scale and load cell (1,000 Hz, AEP transducer, Italy) were used to assess muscle soreness and changes in maximal peak force, respectively, of upper and lower body pre-, post-, 24 h, 48, and 72 h after each protocol. Three-way RM ANOVA was run to compare muscle soreness and neuromuscular fatigue of the upper and lower body between sexes, within protocols and time. Men and women showed similar changes in muscle soreness and neuromuscular fatigue across all protocols and body parts ( p > 0.05). Moreover, both sexes exhibited higher neuromuscular fatigue in the lower body than the upper body, across all protocols ( p < 0.05). These results suggest that men and women show similar kinetics in muscle soreness and neuromuscular fatigue after 3 different RT protocols, with a greater impact experienced in the lower body. Therefore, designing RT programs on sex-specific performance kinetics may not be essential, although increasing upper body exercises volume and frequency can benefit both sexes.</p>","PeriodicalId":17129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","volume":" ","pages":"625-633"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Muscle Soreness and Neuromuscular Fatigue After Three Different Resistance Exercise Protocols: Comparison Between Men and Women.\",\"authors\":\"Michela Margoni, Gianluca Bochicchio, Luca Ferrari, Silvia Pogliaghi\",\"doi\":\"10.1519/JSC.0000000000005103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Margoni, M, Bochicchio, G, Ferrari, L, and Pogliaghi, S. Muscle soreness and neuromuscular fatigue after three different resistance exercise protocols: Comparison between men and women. J Strength Cond Res 39(6): 625-633, 2025-This study evaluated the sex-related differences in the magnitude and time course of muscle soreness and neuromuscular fatigue after 3 different resistance training (RT) protocols, in both the upper and lower body. Sixteen recreational resistance-trained women ( n = 7) and men ( n = 9) performed 3 RT protocols, in randomized order as either power (POW, 4 × 5 at 50% 1 repetition maximum [1RM]), strength (STR, 4 × 2 at 90% 1RM), and hypertrophy (4 × 10 at 70% 1RM), involving 2 main exercises (back squat and bench press) at aim-specific training load, and 4 complementary exercises. Visual analog scale and load cell (1,000 Hz, AEP transducer, Italy) were used to assess muscle soreness and changes in maximal peak force, respectively, of upper and lower body pre-, post-, 24 h, 48, and 72 h after each protocol. Three-way RM ANOVA was run to compare muscle soreness and neuromuscular fatigue of the upper and lower body between sexes, within protocols and time. Men and women showed similar changes in muscle soreness and neuromuscular fatigue across all protocols and body parts ( p > 0.05). Moreover, both sexes exhibited higher neuromuscular fatigue in the lower body than the upper body, across all protocols ( p < 0.05). These results suggest that men and women show similar kinetics in muscle soreness and neuromuscular fatigue after 3 different RT protocols, with a greater impact experienced in the lower body. Therefore, designing RT programs on sex-specific performance kinetics may not be essential, although increasing upper body exercises volume and frequency can benefit both sexes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"625-633\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000005103\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000005103","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Muscle Soreness and Neuromuscular Fatigue After Three Different Resistance Exercise Protocols: Comparison Between Men and Women.
Abstract: Margoni, M, Bochicchio, G, Ferrari, L, and Pogliaghi, S. Muscle soreness and neuromuscular fatigue after three different resistance exercise protocols: Comparison between men and women. J Strength Cond Res 39(6): 625-633, 2025-This study evaluated the sex-related differences in the magnitude and time course of muscle soreness and neuromuscular fatigue after 3 different resistance training (RT) protocols, in both the upper and lower body. Sixteen recreational resistance-trained women ( n = 7) and men ( n = 9) performed 3 RT protocols, in randomized order as either power (POW, 4 × 5 at 50% 1 repetition maximum [1RM]), strength (STR, 4 × 2 at 90% 1RM), and hypertrophy (4 × 10 at 70% 1RM), involving 2 main exercises (back squat and bench press) at aim-specific training load, and 4 complementary exercises. Visual analog scale and load cell (1,000 Hz, AEP transducer, Italy) were used to assess muscle soreness and changes in maximal peak force, respectively, of upper and lower body pre-, post-, 24 h, 48, and 72 h after each protocol. Three-way RM ANOVA was run to compare muscle soreness and neuromuscular fatigue of the upper and lower body between sexes, within protocols and time. Men and women showed similar changes in muscle soreness and neuromuscular fatigue across all protocols and body parts ( p > 0.05). Moreover, both sexes exhibited higher neuromuscular fatigue in the lower body than the upper body, across all protocols ( p < 0.05). These results suggest that men and women show similar kinetics in muscle soreness and neuromuscular fatigue after 3 different RT protocols, with a greater impact experienced in the lower body. Therefore, designing RT programs on sex-specific performance kinetics may not be essential, although increasing upper body exercises volume and frequency can benefit both sexes.
期刊介绍:
The editorial mission of The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (JSCR) is to advance the knowledge about strength and conditioning through research. A unique aspect of this journal is that it includes recommendations for the practical use of research findings. While the journal name identifies strength and conditioning as separate entities, strength is considered a part of conditioning. This journal wishes to promote the publication of peer-reviewed manuscripts which add to our understanding of conditioning and sport through applied exercise science.