超声显示出血性胎盘病变:连续的胎盘早剥。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Yinka Oyelese, Ethan Litman, Jonathan L Hecht, Edgar Hernandez-Andrade, Wendy L Kinzler
{"title":"超声显示出血性胎盘病变:连续的胎盘早剥。","authors":"Yinka Oyelese, Ethan Litman, Jonathan L Hecht, Edgar Hernandez-Andrade, Wendy L Kinzler","doi":"10.1515/jpm-2024-0564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Placental abruption has classically been defined as the premature separation of a normally located placenta before delivery of the fetus. Traditionally, this diagnosis was based on clinical symptoms, including vaginal bleeding, pain, and fetal distress. This definition, however, preceded the advent of obstetric ultrasound. Ultrasound frequently identifies various hemorrhagic lesions, such as retroplacental, subchorionic, intraamniotic, intraplacental, and preplacental hematomas in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. These variable ultrasound findings lead to new challenges as to what to define as an abruption, particularly in the absence of symptoms. This ambiguity in defining placental abruption affects clinical decision-making and hinders our understanding of the pathophysiology of abruption, presenting challenges in studying abruption. It is likely that these varying sonographic findings may precede the classic presentation of vaginal bleeding and pain and therefore are often concealed abruptions. This commentary highlights the importance of developing clear diagnostic guidelines for placental abruption, given its association with severe outcomes including a high rate of perinatal mortality and maternal morbidity. We aim to elucidate the complexities of ultrasound diagnosis in placental abruption, advocating for precise criteria to better guide clinical practice. We propose that these ultrasound findings of hemorrhagic placental lesions after 20 weeks of gestation in asymptomatic patients should be considered part of the spectrum of abruption, while in symptomatic patients should be taken as confirmation of the diagnosis of abruption.</p>","PeriodicalId":16704,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perinatal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hemorrhagic placental lesions on ultrasound: a continuum of placental abruption.\",\"authors\":\"Yinka Oyelese, Ethan Litman, Jonathan L Hecht, Edgar Hernandez-Andrade, Wendy L Kinzler\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/jpm-2024-0564\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Placental abruption has classically been defined as the premature separation of a normally located placenta before delivery of the fetus. Traditionally, this diagnosis was based on clinical symptoms, including vaginal bleeding, pain, and fetal distress. This definition, however, preceded the advent of obstetric ultrasound. Ultrasound frequently identifies various hemorrhagic lesions, such as retroplacental, subchorionic, intraamniotic, intraplacental, and preplacental hematomas in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. These variable ultrasound findings lead to new challenges as to what to define as an abruption, particularly in the absence of symptoms. This ambiguity in defining placental abruption affects clinical decision-making and hinders our understanding of the pathophysiology of abruption, presenting challenges in studying abruption. It is likely that these varying sonographic findings may precede the classic presentation of vaginal bleeding and pain and therefore are often concealed abruptions. This commentary highlights the importance of developing clear diagnostic guidelines for placental abruption, given its association with severe outcomes including a high rate of perinatal mortality and maternal morbidity. We aim to elucidate the complexities of ultrasound diagnosis in placental abruption, advocating for precise criteria to better guide clinical practice. We propose that these ultrasound findings of hemorrhagic placental lesions after 20 weeks of gestation in asymptomatic patients should be considered part of the spectrum of abruption, while in symptomatic patients should be taken as confirmation of the diagnosis of abruption.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Perinatal Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Perinatal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2024-0564\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perinatal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2024-0564","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

胎盘早剥通常被定义为在胎儿娩出前正常位置的胎盘过早分离。传统上,这种诊断是基于临床症状,包括阴道出血、疼痛和胎儿窘迫。然而,这个定义早于产科超声的出现。超声经常发现各种出血性病变,如胎盘后、绒毛膜下、羊膜内、胎盘内和胎盘前血肿,在有症状和无症状的患者。这些可变的超声结果导致新的挑战,即什么是定义为早剥,特别是在没有症状。这种定义胎盘早剥的模糊性影响了临床决策,阻碍了我们对早剥病理生理的理解,给早剥研究带来了挑战。很可能这些不同的超声检查结果可能先于阴道出血和疼痛的经典表现,因此通常是隐藏的早发。鉴于胎盘早剥与围产期死亡率和孕产妇发病率高等严重后果相关,本评论强调了制定明确的胎盘早剥诊断指南的重要性。我们的目的是阐明超声诊断胎盘早剥的复杂性,倡导精确的标准,以更好地指导临床实践。我们建议,无症状患者在妊娠20周后出现出血性胎盘病变的超声表现应视为早剥谱系的一部分,而有症状患者应作为早剥诊断的确认。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hemorrhagic placental lesions on ultrasound: a continuum of placental abruption.

Placental abruption has classically been defined as the premature separation of a normally located placenta before delivery of the fetus. Traditionally, this diagnosis was based on clinical symptoms, including vaginal bleeding, pain, and fetal distress. This definition, however, preceded the advent of obstetric ultrasound. Ultrasound frequently identifies various hemorrhagic lesions, such as retroplacental, subchorionic, intraamniotic, intraplacental, and preplacental hematomas in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. These variable ultrasound findings lead to new challenges as to what to define as an abruption, particularly in the absence of symptoms. This ambiguity in defining placental abruption affects clinical decision-making and hinders our understanding of the pathophysiology of abruption, presenting challenges in studying abruption. It is likely that these varying sonographic findings may precede the classic presentation of vaginal bleeding and pain and therefore are often concealed abruptions. This commentary highlights the importance of developing clear diagnostic guidelines for placental abruption, given its association with severe outcomes including a high rate of perinatal mortality and maternal morbidity. We aim to elucidate the complexities of ultrasound diagnosis in placental abruption, advocating for precise criteria to better guide clinical practice. We propose that these ultrasound findings of hemorrhagic placental lesions after 20 weeks of gestation in asymptomatic patients should be considered part of the spectrum of abruption, while in symptomatic patients should be taken as confirmation of the diagnosis of abruption.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Perinatal Medicine
Journal of Perinatal Medicine 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
183
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Perinatal Medicine (JPM) is a truly international forum covering the entire field of perinatal medicine. It is an essential news source for all those obstetricians, neonatologists, perinatologists and allied health professionals who wish to keep abreast of progress in perinatal and related research. Ahead-of-print publishing ensures fastest possible knowledge transfer. The Journal provides statements on themes of topical interest as well as information and different views on controversial topics. It also informs about the academic, organisational and political aims and objectives of the World Association of Perinatal Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信