犬脐带间充质/间质干细胞的分离与鉴定。

IF 1.5 4区 生物学 Q4 CELL BIOLOGY
Aline Pimentel, Triciana Gonçalves-Silva, Jasmin, Rosalia Mendez-Otero
{"title":"犬脐带间充质/间质干细胞的分离与鉴定。","authors":"Aline Pimentel, Triciana Gonçalves-Silva, Jasmin, Rosalia Mendez-Otero","doi":"10.1007/s11626-025-01023-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have therapeutic potential due to their immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory properties. In veterinary medicine, adipose tissue is the most common source of MSCs to treat canine disease, but the collection process is invasive, and the cells are influenced by the age and health conditions of the donor. These problems enhance interest in seeking alternative MSC sources, such as perinatal tissues. In this study, we developed and validated an optimized protocol for isolating canine umbilical cord MSCs for application in veterinary therapies. Umbilical cords obtained from cesarean sections were processed using three different protocols, involving combinations of mechanical and enzymatic tissue dissociation. The cells were cultured and evaluated for membrane receptors by flow cytometry to identify MSCs and assessed for their differentiation capacity. The number of cells obtained did not differ significantly between the combined protocol with trypsin and collagenase (TRIP + COL) and the collagenase protocol (COL). In in vitro culture, the combined TRIP + COL and COL yielded 12 to 14 times more cells, respectively, in the first passage than the explant (EXP) group, within fewer days of culture. Additionally, the cells obtained from these protocols showed a greater capacity for expansion over passages, and cells from both protocols showed fibroblast-like morphology and proliferation capacity up to the sixth passage. The cells obtained from these protocols were characterized by phenotype: CD45<sup>-</sup>, CD34<sup>-</sup>, CD14<sup>-</sup>, HLA-DR<sup>-</sup>, CD29<sup>+</sup>, CD44<sup>+</sup>, and CD90<sup>+</sup>, consistent with MSC identity. However, CD90 expression in the cells decreased significantly at sixth passage. Regarding differentiation, cells obtained from the COL protocol showed a capacity for commitment to the chondrogenic and osteogenic lineages. In conclusion, the COL and TRIP + COL protocols were more effective than the EXP protocol in terms of both the number and quality of isolated cells. However, due to its less-aggressive enzymatic nature, we considered the COL protocol to be the best method to obtain canine MSCs.</p>","PeriodicalId":13340,"journal":{"name":"In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology. Animal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Isolation and characterization of canine umbilical cord mesenchymal/stromal stem cells.\",\"authors\":\"Aline Pimentel, Triciana Gonçalves-Silva, Jasmin, Rosalia Mendez-Otero\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11626-025-01023-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have therapeutic potential due to their immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory properties. In veterinary medicine, adipose tissue is the most common source of MSCs to treat canine disease, but the collection process is invasive, and the cells are influenced by the age and health conditions of the donor. These problems enhance interest in seeking alternative MSC sources, such as perinatal tissues. In this study, we developed and validated an optimized protocol for isolating canine umbilical cord MSCs for application in veterinary therapies. Umbilical cords obtained from cesarean sections were processed using three different protocols, involving combinations of mechanical and enzymatic tissue dissociation. The cells were cultured and evaluated for membrane receptors by flow cytometry to identify MSCs and assessed for their differentiation capacity. The number of cells obtained did not differ significantly between the combined protocol with trypsin and collagenase (TRIP + COL) and the collagenase protocol (COL). In in vitro culture, the combined TRIP + COL and COL yielded 12 to 14 times more cells, respectively, in the first passage than the explant (EXP) group, within fewer days of culture. Additionally, the cells obtained from these protocols showed a greater capacity for expansion over passages, and cells from both protocols showed fibroblast-like morphology and proliferation capacity up to the sixth passage. The cells obtained from these protocols were characterized by phenotype: CD45<sup>-</sup>, CD34<sup>-</sup>, CD14<sup>-</sup>, HLA-DR<sup>-</sup>, CD29<sup>+</sup>, CD44<sup>+</sup>, and CD90<sup>+</sup>, consistent with MSC identity. However, CD90 expression in the cells decreased significantly at sixth passage. Regarding differentiation, cells obtained from the COL protocol showed a capacity for commitment to the chondrogenic and osteogenic lineages. In conclusion, the COL and TRIP + COL protocols were more effective than the EXP protocol in terms of both the number and quality of isolated cells. However, due to its less-aggressive enzymatic nature, we considered the COL protocol to be the best method to obtain canine MSCs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13340,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology. Animal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology. Animal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11626-025-01023-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology. Animal","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11626-025-01023-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

间充质干细胞(MSCs)由于其免疫调节和抗炎特性而具有治疗潜力。在兽医学中,脂肪组织是治疗犬类疾病最常见的MSCs来源,但收集过程是侵入性的,并且细胞受供体年龄和健康状况的影响。这些问题增加了寻找替代间充质干细胞来源的兴趣,如围产期组织。在这项研究中,我们开发并验证了一种分离犬脐带间充质干细胞用于兽医治疗的优化方案。从剖宫产获得的脐带采用三种不同的处理方案,包括机械和酶组织分离的组合。培养这些细胞,并通过流式细胞术评估其膜受体,以鉴定MSCs并评估其分化能力。在胰蛋白酶和胶原酶联合方案(TRIP + COL)和胶原酶方案(COL)之间获得的细胞数量没有显著差异。在体外培养中,在较短的培养时间内,TRIP + COL和COL组合在第一次传代中产生的细胞分别是外植体(EXP)组的12 ~ 14倍。此外,通过这两种方法获得的细胞在传代过程中表现出更大的扩增能力,并且两种方法的细胞在第六代之前都表现出成纤维细胞样的形态和增殖能力。从这些方案中获得的细胞具有表型特征:CD45-, CD34-, CD14-, HLA-DR-, CD29+, CD44+和CD90+,与MSC身份一致。然而,在第6代时,CD90在细胞中的表达明显下降。关于分化,从COL方案中获得的细胞显示出向软骨和成骨谱系的承诺能力。综上所述,在分离细胞的数量和质量方面,COL和TRIP + COL方案比EXP方案更有效。然而,由于其较弱的酶促性质,我们认为COL方案是获得犬间充质干细胞的最佳方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Isolation and characterization of canine umbilical cord mesenchymal/stromal stem cells.

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have therapeutic potential due to their immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory properties. In veterinary medicine, adipose tissue is the most common source of MSCs to treat canine disease, but the collection process is invasive, and the cells are influenced by the age and health conditions of the donor. These problems enhance interest in seeking alternative MSC sources, such as perinatal tissues. In this study, we developed and validated an optimized protocol for isolating canine umbilical cord MSCs for application in veterinary therapies. Umbilical cords obtained from cesarean sections were processed using three different protocols, involving combinations of mechanical and enzymatic tissue dissociation. The cells were cultured and evaluated for membrane receptors by flow cytometry to identify MSCs and assessed for their differentiation capacity. The number of cells obtained did not differ significantly between the combined protocol with trypsin and collagenase (TRIP + COL) and the collagenase protocol (COL). In in vitro culture, the combined TRIP + COL and COL yielded 12 to 14 times more cells, respectively, in the first passage than the explant (EXP) group, within fewer days of culture. Additionally, the cells obtained from these protocols showed a greater capacity for expansion over passages, and cells from both protocols showed fibroblast-like morphology and proliferation capacity up to the sixth passage. The cells obtained from these protocols were characterized by phenotype: CD45-, CD34-, CD14-, HLA-DR-, CD29+, CD44+, and CD90+, consistent with MSC identity. However, CD90 expression in the cells decreased significantly at sixth passage. Regarding differentiation, cells obtained from the COL protocol showed a capacity for commitment to the chondrogenic and osteogenic lineages. In conclusion, the COL and TRIP + COL protocols were more effective than the EXP protocol in terms of both the number and quality of isolated cells. However, due to its less-aggressive enzymatic nature, we considered the COL protocol to be the best method to obtain canine MSCs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
96
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Animal is a journal of the Society for In Vitro Biology (SIVB). Original manuscripts reporting results of research in cellular, molecular, and developmental biology that employ or are relevant to organs, tissue, tumors, and cells in vitro will be considered for publication. Topics covered include: Biotechnology; Cell and Tissue Models; Cell Growth/Differentiation/Apoptosis; Cellular Pathology/Virology; Cytokines/Growth Factors/Adhesion Factors; Establishment of Cell Lines; Signal Transduction; Stem Cells; Toxicology/Chemical Carcinogenesis; Product Applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信