一种新型扫描源光学相干层析生物计和一种scheimpflud - placido地形仪对前段测量的比较。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Chak Seng Lei, Xin Li, Huilin Xu, Rui Ning, Yiran Wang, Giacomo Savini, Domenico Schiano-Lomoriello, Xingtao Zhou, Kexin Li, Jinhai Huang
{"title":"一种新型扫描源光学相干层析生物计和一种scheimpflud - placido地形仪对前段测量的比较。","authors":"Chak Seng Lei, Xin Li, Huilin Xu, Rui Ning, Yiran Wang, Giacomo Savini, Domenico Schiano-Lomoriello, Xingtao Zhou, Kexin Li, Jinhai Huang","doi":"10.3928/1081597X-20250317-03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the agreement of anterior segment measurements between a new swept-source optical coherence tomography biometer (ZW-30; TowardPi Medical Technology) and a Scheimpflug-Placido topographer (Sirius; Costruzione Strumenti Oftalmici) in normal eyes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective study, measurement agreement was assessed in 56 right eyes of 56 healthy patients. One experienced operator obtained three consecutive measurements with both devices randomly. The comparative parameters were central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior aqueous depth (AQD), anterior chamber depth (ACD), mean keratometry, astigmatism magnitude (AST), J<sub>0</sub> and J<sub>45</sub> power vectors, and corneal diameter (CD). The paired <i>t</i>-test was used to compare the difference between the two devices. Pearson's correlation analysis and Bland-Altman plots with 95% limits of agreement (LoA) were calculated to evaluate agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The paired <i>t</i>-test showed statistically significant differences in all parameters (<i>P</i> < .05). Correlation analysis showed high correlation, Bland-Altman plots indicated moderate to high agreement between the two devices. The 95% LoA of CCT, AQD, ACD, mean keratometry, AST, J<sub>0</sub> and J<sub>45</sub> power vectors, and CD ranged from -4.36 to 19.83 µm, -0.11 to 0.04 mm, -0.12 to 0.03 mm, -0.50 to 0.12 D, -0.29 to 0.39 D, -0.20 to 0.14 D, -0.17 to 0.13 D, and 0.18 to 0.80 mm, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Anterior segment measurements from the new SS-OCT biometer and the Scheimpflug-Placido topographer demonstrated high agreement in AQD, ACD, AST, and J<sub>0</sub> and J<sub>45</sub> power vectors. However, for CCT, mean keratometry, and CD, the moderate inter-device agreement suggests that results should be interpreted with caution when making comparisons. <b>[<i>J Refract Surg</i>. 2025;41(5):e413-e420.]</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":16951,"journal":{"name":"Journal of refractive surgery","volume":"41 5","pages":"e413-e420"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Anterior Segment Measurements With a New Swept-source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometer and a Scheimpflug-Placido Topographer.\",\"authors\":\"Chak Seng Lei, Xin Li, Huilin Xu, Rui Ning, Yiran Wang, Giacomo Savini, Domenico Schiano-Lomoriello, Xingtao Zhou, Kexin Li, Jinhai Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.3928/1081597X-20250317-03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the agreement of anterior segment measurements between a new swept-source optical coherence tomography biometer (ZW-30; TowardPi Medical Technology) and a Scheimpflug-Placido topographer (Sirius; Costruzione Strumenti Oftalmici) in normal eyes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective study, measurement agreement was assessed in 56 right eyes of 56 healthy patients. One experienced operator obtained three consecutive measurements with both devices randomly. The comparative parameters were central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior aqueous depth (AQD), anterior chamber depth (ACD), mean keratometry, astigmatism magnitude (AST), J<sub>0</sub> and J<sub>45</sub> power vectors, and corneal diameter (CD). The paired <i>t</i>-test was used to compare the difference between the two devices. Pearson's correlation analysis and Bland-Altman plots with 95% limits of agreement (LoA) were calculated to evaluate agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The paired <i>t</i>-test showed statistically significant differences in all parameters (<i>P</i> < .05). Correlation analysis showed high correlation, Bland-Altman plots indicated moderate to high agreement between the two devices. The 95% LoA of CCT, AQD, ACD, mean keratometry, AST, J<sub>0</sub> and J<sub>45</sub> power vectors, and CD ranged from -4.36 to 19.83 µm, -0.11 to 0.04 mm, -0.12 to 0.03 mm, -0.50 to 0.12 D, -0.29 to 0.39 D, -0.20 to 0.14 D, -0.17 to 0.13 D, and 0.18 to 0.80 mm, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Anterior segment measurements from the new SS-OCT biometer and the Scheimpflug-Placido topographer demonstrated high agreement in AQD, ACD, AST, and J<sub>0</sub> and J<sub>45</sub> power vectors. However, for CCT, mean keratometry, and CD, the moderate inter-device agreement suggests that results should be interpreted with caution when making comparisons. <b>[<i>J Refract Surg</i>. 2025;41(5):e413-e420.]</b>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16951,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of refractive surgery\",\"volume\":\"41 5\",\"pages\":\"e413-e420\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of refractive surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20250317-03\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20250317-03","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价新型扫源光学相干层析成像生物仪(ZW-30;TowardPi Medical Technology)和一名Scheimpflug-Placido地形学家(Sirius;正常眼的Costruzione Strumenti Oftalmici。方法:本前瞻性研究对56例健康患者的56只右眼进行测量一致性评估。一位经验丰富的操作员随机地用两种设备连续测量了三次。比较参数为角膜中央厚度(CCT)、前水深度(AQD)、前房深度(ACD)、平均角膜度数、散光强度(AST)、J0和J45功率矢量、角膜直径(CD)。配对t检验用于比较两种设备之间的差异。计算Pearson相关分析和95%一致性限(LoA)的Bland-Altman图来评估一致性。结果:经配对t检验,各参数差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。相关分析显示相关性高,Bland-Altman图显示两种设备之间有中等到高度的一致性。CCT、AQD、ACD、平均角膜曲率、AST、J0和J45功率矢量和CD的95% LoA分别为-4.36 ~ 19.83µm、-0.11 ~ 0.04 mm、-0.12 ~ 0.03 mm、-0.50 ~ 0.12 D、-0.29 ~ 0.39 D、-0.20 ~ 0.14 D、-0.17 ~ 0.13 D和0.18 ~ 0.80 mm。结论:新的SS-OCT生物计和Scheimpflug-Placido地形仪的前段测量结果在AQD、ACD、AST以及J0和J45功率载体上显示出高度一致。然而,对于CCT、平均角膜度数和CD,设备间的适度一致性表明,在进行比较时应谨慎解释结果。[J].中国光学精密工程,2015;41(5):563 - 568。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Anterior Segment Measurements With a New Swept-source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometer and a Scheimpflug-Placido Topographer.

Purpose: To assess the agreement of anterior segment measurements between a new swept-source optical coherence tomography biometer (ZW-30; TowardPi Medical Technology) and a Scheimpflug-Placido topographer (Sirius; Costruzione Strumenti Oftalmici) in normal eyes.

Methods: In this prospective study, measurement agreement was assessed in 56 right eyes of 56 healthy patients. One experienced operator obtained three consecutive measurements with both devices randomly. The comparative parameters were central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior aqueous depth (AQD), anterior chamber depth (ACD), mean keratometry, astigmatism magnitude (AST), J0 and J45 power vectors, and corneal diameter (CD). The paired t-test was used to compare the difference between the two devices. Pearson's correlation analysis and Bland-Altman plots with 95% limits of agreement (LoA) were calculated to evaluate agreement.

Results: The paired t-test showed statistically significant differences in all parameters (P < .05). Correlation analysis showed high correlation, Bland-Altman plots indicated moderate to high agreement between the two devices. The 95% LoA of CCT, AQD, ACD, mean keratometry, AST, J0 and J45 power vectors, and CD ranged from -4.36 to 19.83 µm, -0.11 to 0.04 mm, -0.12 to 0.03 mm, -0.50 to 0.12 D, -0.29 to 0.39 D, -0.20 to 0.14 D, -0.17 to 0.13 D, and 0.18 to 0.80 mm, respectively.

Conclusions: Anterior segment measurements from the new SS-OCT biometer and the Scheimpflug-Placido topographer demonstrated high agreement in AQD, ACD, AST, and J0 and J45 power vectors. However, for CCT, mean keratometry, and CD, the moderate inter-device agreement suggests that results should be interpreted with caution when making comparisons. [J Refract Surg. 2025;41(5):e413-e420.].

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
160
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Refractive Surgery, the official journal of the International Society of Refractive Surgery, a partner of the American Academy of Ophthalmology, has been a monthly peer-reviewed forum for original research, review, and evaluation of refractive and lens-based surgical procedures for more than 30 years. Practical, clinically valuable articles provide readers with the most up-to-date information regarding advances in the field of refractive surgery. Begin to explore the Journal and all of its great benefits such as: • Columns including “Translational Science,” “Surgical Techniques,” and “Biomechanics” • Supplemental videos and materials available for many articles • Access to current articles, as well as several years of archived content • Articles posted online just 2 months after acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信