自定义与标准角膜交联治疗激光原位角膜磨砂术后扩张的比较。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Elina M Utti, Kari M Krootila Md
{"title":"自定义与标准角膜交联治疗激光原位角膜磨砂术后扩张的比较。","authors":"Elina M Utti, Kari M Krootila Md","doi":"10.3928/1081597X-20250401-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the effect of customized corneal cross-linking (CXL) in ectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-two eyes of 24 patients with post-LASIK ectasia treated with customized CXL were included in this study. Treatment zones with different ultraviolet energy levels were planned according to corneal tomography. A control group of 19 eyes of 14 patients with post-LASIK ectasia received conventional CXL. Patients were prospectively followed up at 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year after the procedure. Subsequent follow-up 2 to 4 years after CXL was obtained from 22 eyes of 18 patients. Corrected distance visual acuity, refraction, and anterior segment optical coherence tomography parameters were compared to preoperative values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After a transient deterioration at 1 month, visual acuity and keratometry stabilized at 6 months in both groups. One year after customized CXL, the visual acuity was significantly better (P< .01), corneal inferior-superior asymmetry decreased (<i>P</i> = .02), and corneal thickness increased (<i>P</i> < .01). These effects were maintained during the 2- to 4-year follow-up. There were no statistically significant changes in refractive outcomes or keratometry at 1 or 2 to 4 years. Decrease in higher order irregularities was seen only after customized CXL, but it did not reach statistical significance. In 1 patient the ectasia continued progressing after customized CXL, giving a failure rate of 4.2%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Customized CXL seems to be as safe as standard CXL in treating progressive post-LASIK ectasia. The results suggest that customized CXL could have a better effect on visual acuity and corneal asymmetry. More studies are needed to verify the advantages of customized method over standard CXL.the <b>[<i>J Refract Surg</i>. 2025;41(5):e451-e459.]</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":16951,"journal":{"name":"Journal of refractive surgery","volume":"41 5","pages":"e451-e459"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Customized and Standard Corneal Cross-linking for Ectasia After Laser in Situ Keratomileusis.\",\"authors\":\"Elina M Utti, Kari M Krootila Md\",\"doi\":\"10.3928/1081597X-20250401-02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the effect of customized corneal cross-linking (CXL) in ectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-two eyes of 24 patients with post-LASIK ectasia treated with customized CXL were included in this study. Treatment zones with different ultraviolet energy levels were planned according to corneal tomography. A control group of 19 eyes of 14 patients with post-LASIK ectasia received conventional CXL. Patients were prospectively followed up at 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year after the procedure. Subsequent follow-up 2 to 4 years after CXL was obtained from 22 eyes of 18 patients. Corrected distance visual acuity, refraction, and anterior segment optical coherence tomography parameters were compared to preoperative values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After a transient deterioration at 1 month, visual acuity and keratometry stabilized at 6 months in both groups. One year after customized CXL, the visual acuity was significantly better (P< .01), corneal inferior-superior asymmetry decreased (<i>P</i> = .02), and corneal thickness increased (<i>P</i> < .01). These effects were maintained during the 2- to 4-year follow-up. There were no statistically significant changes in refractive outcomes or keratometry at 1 or 2 to 4 years. Decrease in higher order irregularities was seen only after customized CXL, but it did not reach statistical significance. In 1 patient the ectasia continued progressing after customized CXL, giving a failure rate of 4.2%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Customized CXL seems to be as safe as standard CXL in treating progressive post-LASIK ectasia. The results suggest that customized CXL could have a better effect on visual acuity and corneal asymmetry. More studies are needed to verify the advantages of customized method over standard CXL.the <b>[<i>J Refract Surg</i>. 2025;41(5):e451-e459.]</b>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16951,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of refractive surgery\",\"volume\":\"41 5\",\"pages\":\"e451-e459\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of refractive surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20250401-02\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20250401-02","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价自定义角膜交联(CXL)在激光原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)后角膜扩张中的效果。方法:采用定制化CXL治疗lasik术后扩张患者24例32眼。根据角膜断层扫描结果规划不同紫外线能级的治疗区。对照组14例lasik术后患者19眼行常规CXL。分别于术后1个月、6个月和1年对患者进行前瞻性随访。18例患者22只眼行CXL术后随访2 ~ 4年。校正距离、视力、屈光度和前段光学相干断层扫描参数与术前值进行比较。结果:两组患者在1个月的短暂性视力恶化后,6个月时视力和角膜测量稳定。定制CXL术后1年,患者的视力明显改善(P< 0.01),角膜上下不对称性明显降低(P = 0.02),角膜厚度明显增加(P< 0.01)。这些效果在2- 4年的随访中得以维持。在1年或2至4年,屈光结果或角膜测量没有统计学上的显著变化。定制CXL后,高阶不规则现象有所减少,但未达到统计学意义。1例患者在定制CXL后扩张继续进展,失败率为4.2%。结论:在治疗lasik后进行性扩张症中,定制化CXL与标准CXL一样安全。结果表明,定制化CXL对改善视力和角膜不对称有较好的效果。需要更多的研究来验证定制方法相对于标准CXL的优势。[J].中华眼科杂志,2015;41(5):451- 459。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Customized and Standard Corneal Cross-linking for Ectasia After Laser in Situ Keratomileusis.

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of customized corneal cross-linking (CXL) in ectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).

Methods: Thirty-two eyes of 24 patients with post-LASIK ectasia treated with customized CXL were included in this study. Treatment zones with different ultraviolet energy levels were planned according to corneal tomography. A control group of 19 eyes of 14 patients with post-LASIK ectasia received conventional CXL. Patients were prospectively followed up at 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year after the procedure. Subsequent follow-up 2 to 4 years after CXL was obtained from 22 eyes of 18 patients. Corrected distance visual acuity, refraction, and anterior segment optical coherence tomography parameters were compared to preoperative values.

Results: After a transient deterioration at 1 month, visual acuity and keratometry stabilized at 6 months in both groups. One year after customized CXL, the visual acuity was significantly better (P< .01), corneal inferior-superior asymmetry decreased (P = .02), and corneal thickness increased (P < .01). These effects were maintained during the 2- to 4-year follow-up. There were no statistically significant changes in refractive outcomes or keratometry at 1 or 2 to 4 years. Decrease in higher order irregularities was seen only after customized CXL, but it did not reach statistical significance. In 1 patient the ectasia continued progressing after customized CXL, giving a failure rate of 4.2%.

Conclusions: Customized CXL seems to be as safe as standard CXL in treating progressive post-LASIK ectasia. The results suggest that customized CXL could have a better effect on visual acuity and corneal asymmetry. More studies are needed to verify the advantages of customized method over standard CXL.the [J Refract Surg. 2025;41(5):e451-e459.].

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
160
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Refractive Surgery, the official journal of the International Society of Refractive Surgery, a partner of the American Academy of Ophthalmology, has been a monthly peer-reviewed forum for original research, review, and evaluation of refractive and lens-based surgical procedures for more than 30 years. Practical, clinically valuable articles provide readers with the most up-to-date information regarding advances in the field of refractive surgery. Begin to explore the Journal and all of its great benefits such as: • Columns including “Translational Science,” “Surgical Techniques,” and “Biomechanics” • Supplemental videos and materials available for many articles • Access to current articles, as well as several years of archived content • Articles posted online just 2 months after acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信