荧光分子成像在周围和深部颜面边缘评估中的应用前景。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Journal of Biomedical Optics Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-02 DOI:10.1117/1.JBO.30.S1.S13711
Hang M Nguyen, Veronica C Torres, Joshua Levy, Eunice Y Chen, Matthew LeBoeuf, Kimberley S Samkoe
{"title":"荧光分子成像在周围和深部颜面边缘评估中的应用前景。","authors":"Hang M Nguyen, Veronica C Torres, Joshua Levy, Eunice Y Chen, Matthew LeBoeuf, Kimberley S Samkoe","doi":"10.1117/1.JBO.30.S1.S13711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Significance: </strong>Current standard practice for margin assessment in solid tumor resection often leads to suboptimal results due to the inability to assess margins completely in a time-efficient manner. On the other hand, for small skin cancers, peripheral and deep <i>en face</i> margin assessment (PDEMA) offers 100% assessment of margins while sparing the utmost amount of normal surrounding tissues. Nonetheless, PDEMA is limited in its use owing to its lengthy tissue processing and imaging time as well as its requirement for high-quality frozen sections and real-time histologic analysis.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>We aim to explore fluorescence molecular imaging (FMI) as a tool for resolving obstacles and integrating PDEMA into the surgeon-to-pathologist workflow for large solid tumors.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>A review of recent pre-clinical and clinical studies using FMI to assess surgical margins was conducted to highlight promising fluorescence imaging technologies utilized in the surgical suite and laboratory.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>FMI techniques that provide macroscopic resolution are efficient in time and have a notable ability to identify true negative tissue yet have limited capability in identifying true positive tissues. Moreover, meso- and microscopic FMI methods require additional time to attain a higher resolution but deliver an enhanced sensitivity in detecting true positive tissues. In both cases, experts are still required to learn to interpret the FMI signals, which prohibits a seamless clinical integration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our proposed margin assessment platform (MAP) incorporates both macroscopic and, meso- or microscopic imaging with post-processing and machine learning for interpretation, to enable the application of PDEMA into solid tumor surgery. MAP leverages the advantages of each technique and thoroughly tackles the limitations of time and expertise to optimize the efficiency and accuracy of margin assessment and ultimately improve clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15264,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomedical Optics","volume":"30 Suppl 1","pages":"S13711"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12048172/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perspective on the use of fluorescence molecular imaging for peripheral and deep <i>en face</i> margin assessment.\",\"authors\":\"Hang M Nguyen, Veronica C Torres, Joshua Levy, Eunice Y Chen, Matthew LeBoeuf, Kimberley S Samkoe\",\"doi\":\"10.1117/1.JBO.30.S1.S13711\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Significance: </strong>Current standard practice for margin assessment in solid tumor resection often leads to suboptimal results due to the inability to assess margins completely in a time-efficient manner. On the other hand, for small skin cancers, peripheral and deep <i>en face</i> margin assessment (PDEMA) offers 100% assessment of margins while sparing the utmost amount of normal surrounding tissues. Nonetheless, PDEMA is limited in its use owing to its lengthy tissue processing and imaging time as well as its requirement for high-quality frozen sections and real-time histologic analysis.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>We aim to explore fluorescence molecular imaging (FMI) as a tool for resolving obstacles and integrating PDEMA into the surgeon-to-pathologist workflow for large solid tumors.</p><p><strong>Approach: </strong>A review of recent pre-clinical and clinical studies using FMI to assess surgical margins was conducted to highlight promising fluorescence imaging technologies utilized in the surgical suite and laboratory.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>FMI techniques that provide macroscopic resolution are efficient in time and have a notable ability to identify true negative tissue yet have limited capability in identifying true positive tissues. Moreover, meso- and microscopic FMI methods require additional time to attain a higher resolution but deliver an enhanced sensitivity in detecting true positive tissues. In both cases, experts are still required to learn to interpret the FMI signals, which prohibits a seamless clinical integration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our proposed margin assessment platform (MAP) incorporates both macroscopic and, meso- or microscopic imaging with post-processing and machine learning for interpretation, to enable the application of PDEMA into solid tumor surgery. MAP leverages the advantages of each technique and thoroughly tackles the limitations of time and expertise to optimize the efficiency and accuracy of margin assessment and ultimately improve clinical outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15264,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biomedical Optics\",\"volume\":\"30 Suppl 1\",\"pages\":\"S13711\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12048172/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biomedical Optics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.30.S1.S13711\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomedical Optics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.30.S1.S13711","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

意义:目前在实体瘤切除术中进行边缘评估的标准做法,由于无法以一种时间效率高的方式完全评估边缘,常常导致不理想的结果。另一方面,对于小的皮肤癌,外周和深层表面边缘评估(PDEMA)提供100%的边缘评估,同时最大限度地保留正常周围组织。尽管如此,PDEMA的使用受到限制,因为它需要较长的组织处理和成像时间,并且需要高质量的冷冻切片和实时组织学分析。目的:我们的目标是探索荧光分子成像(FMI)作为解决障碍的工具,并将PDEMA整合到大型实体肿瘤的外科到病理学工作流程中。方法:回顾了最近使用FMI评估手术边缘的临床前和临床研究,以强调在手术室和实验室中使用的有前途的荧光成像技术。结果:提供宏观分辨的FMI技术及时有效,对真阴性组织的识别能力显著,但对真阳性组织的识别能力有限。此外,中观和微观FMI方法需要额外的时间来获得更高的分辨率,但在检测真阳性组织时提供了更高的灵敏度。在这两种情况下,专家仍然需要学习解释FMI信号,这阻碍了无缝的临床整合。结论:我们提出的切缘评估平台(MAP)结合了宏观和中观或微观成像以及后处理和机器学习的解释,使PDEMA应用于实体瘤手术。MAP利用每种技术的优势,彻底解决时间和专业知识的限制,以优化边缘评估的效率和准确性,并最终改善临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perspective on the use of fluorescence molecular imaging for peripheral and deep en face margin assessment.

Significance: Current standard practice for margin assessment in solid tumor resection often leads to suboptimal results due to the inability to assess margins completely in a time-efficient manner. On the other hand, for small skin cancers, peripheral and deep en face margin assessment (PDEMA) offers 100% assessment of margins while sparing the utmost amount of normal surrounding tissues. Nonetheless, PDEMA is limited in its use owing to its lengthy tissue processing and imaging time as well as its requirement for high-quality frozen sections and real-time histologic analysis.

Aim: We aim to explore fluorescence molecular imaging (FMI) as a tool for resolving obstacles and integrating PDEMA into the surgeon-to-pathologist workflow for large solid tumors.

Approach: A review of recent pre-clinical and clinical studies using FMI to assess surgical margins was conducted to highlight promising fluorescence imaging technologies utilized in the surgical suite and laboratory.

Results: FMI techniques that provide macroscopic resolution are efficient in time and have a notable ability to identify true negative tissue yet have limited capability in identifying true positive tissues. Moreover, meso- and microscopic FMI methods require additional time to attain a higher resolution but deliver an enhanced sensitivity in detecting true positive tissues. In both cases, experts are still required to learn to interpret the FMI signals, which prohibits a seamless clinical integration.

Conclusions: Our proposed margin assessment platform (MAP) incorporates both macroscopic and, meso- or microscopic imaging with post-processing and machine learning for interpretation, to enable the application of PDEMA into solid tumor surgery. MAP leverages the advantages of each technique and thoroughly tackles the limitations of time and expertise to optimize the efficiency and accuracy of margin assessment and ultimately improve clinical outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.70%
发文量
263
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Biomedical Optics publishes peer-reviewed papers on the use of modern optical technology for improved health care and biomedical research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信