{"title":"唾液腺基底细胞腺瘤与基底细胞腺癌的相关性:129例组织形态学和分子复习。","authors":"Haruna Yagi, Yoshitaka Utsumi, Yuichiro Tada, Satoshi Baba, Toshihide Iwashita, Kennosuke Karube, Makoto Urano, Toshitaka Nagao, Masato Nakaguro","doi":"10.1007/s00428-025-04120-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Basal cell adenoma (BCA) and basal cell adenocarcinoma (BCAC) are salivary gland tumors with biphasic differentiation, composed of luminal ductal cells and abluminal basal cells with a high nuclear-to-cytoplasmic ratio. While BCA is a relatively common benign tumor, BCAC is a rare malignancy, and its genetic context and relationship with BCA remain unclear. We investigated 93 BCA and 36 BCAC cases to further characterize these two tumor entities from histological and molecular perspectives. BCA/BCAC proliferated in a mixture of tubular, trabecular, solid, cribriform, and membranous patterns. A jigsaw puzzle pattern, peripheral palisading, S100-positive stroma, cystic change, and sclerosis were observed in approximately 50% of the cases. BCAC demonstrated the following malignant features: infiltration to surrounding tissue, tumor necrosis, and increased mitotic activity (81%, 22%, and 22%, respectively). The nuclear expression of β-catenin was frequently observed in both BCA and BCAC (89% and 60%), and CTNNB1 hotspot mutations were detected in 46% and 48% of BCA and BCAC cases, respectively. Tubular patterns of growth, jigsaw puzzle patterns, peripheral palisading, S100-positive stroma, and cystic changes were more common in β-catenin-positive BCA/BCAC than in β-catenin-negative BCA/BCAC. Among the β-catenin-negative BCA/BCAC cases, one case each harbored PLAG1 and MYB rearrangements. We concluded that β-catenin-positive BCA and BCAC share common histologic and molecular features, and BCAC is considered a malignant counterpart of BCA. β-Catenin-negative BCA/BCAC might include morphological mimickers, which can be genetically classified into other tumor types, including pleomorphic adenoma and adenoid cystic carcinoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":23514,"journal":{"name":"Virchows Archiv","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correlation between basal cell adenoma and basal cell adenocarcinoma of the salivary gland: a histomorphological and molecular review of 129 cases.\",\"authors\":\"Haruna Yagi, Yoshitaka Utsumi, Yuichiro Tada, Satoshi Baba, Toshihide Iwashita, Kennosuke Karube, Makoto Urano, Toshitaka Nagao, Masato Nakaguro\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00428-025-04120-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Basal cell adenoma (BCA) and basal cell adenocarcinoma (BCAC) are salivary gland tumors with biphasic differentiation, composed of luminal ductal cells and abluminal basal cells with a high nuclear-to-cytoplasmic ratio. While BCA is a relatively common benign tumor, BCAC is a rare malignancy, and its genetic context and relationship with BCA remain unclear. We investigated 93 BCA and 36 BCAC cases to further characterize these two tumor entities from histological and molecular perspectives. BCA/BCAC proliferated in a mixture of tubular, trabecular, solid, cribriform, and membranous patterns. A jigsaw puzzle pattern, peripheral palisading, S100-positive stroma, cystic change, and sclerosis were observed in approximately 50% of the cases. BCAC demonstrated the following malignant features: infiltration to surrounding tissue, tumor necrosis, and increased mitotic activity (81%, 22%, and 22%, respectively). The nuclear expression of β-catenin was frequently observed in both BCA and BCAC (89% and 60%), and CTNNB1 hotspot mutations were detected in 46% and 48% of BCA and BCAC cases, respectively. Tubular patterns of growth, jigsaw puzzle patterns, peripheral palisading, S100-positive stroma, and cystic changes were more common in β-catenin-positive BCA/BCAC than in β-catenin-negative BCA/BCAC. Among the β-catenin-negative BCA/BCAC cases, one case each harbored PLAG1 and MYB rearrangements. We concluded that β-catenin-positive BCA and BCAC share common histologic and molecular features, and BCAC is considered a malignant counterpart of BCA. β-Catenin-negative BCA/BCAC might include morphological mimickers, which can be genetically classified into other tumor types, including pleomorphic adenoma and adenoid cystic carcinoma.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23514,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Virchows Archiv\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Virchows Archiv\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-025-04120-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Virchows Archiv","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-025-04120-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Correlation between basal cell adenoma and basal cell adenocarcinoma of the salivary gland: a histomorphological and molecular review of 129 cases.
Basal cell adenoma (BCA) and basal cell adenocarcinoma (BCAC) are salivary gland tumors with biphasic differentiation, composed of luminal ductal cells and abluminal basal cells with a high nuclear-to-cytoplasmic ratio. While BCA is a relatively common benign tumor, BCAC is a rare malignancy, and its genetic context and relationship with BCA remain unclear. We investigated 93 BCA and 36 BCAC cases to further characterize these two tumor entities from histological and molecular perspectives. BCA/BCAC proliferated in a mixture of tubular, trabecular, solid, cribriform, and membranous patterns. A jigsaw puzzle pattern, peripheral palisading, S100-positive stroma, cystic change, and sclerosis were observed in approximately 50% of the cases. BCAC demonstrated the following malignant features: infiltration to surrounding tissue, tumor necrosis, and increased mitotic activity (81%, 22%, and 22%, respectively). The nuclear expression of β-catenin was frequently observed in both BCA and BCAC (89% and 60%), and CTNNB1 hotspot mutations were detected in 46% and 48% of BCA and BCAC cases, respectively. Tubular patterns of growth, jigsaw puzzle patterns, peripheral palisading, S100-positive stroma, and cystic changes were more common in β-catenin-positive BCA/BCAC than in β-catenin-negative BCA/BCAC. Among the β-catenin-negative BCA/BCAC cases, one case each harbored PLAG1 and MYB rearrangements. We concluded that β-catenin-positive BCA and BCAC share common histologic and molecular features, and BCAC is considered a malignant counterpart of BCA. β-Catenin-negative BCA/BCAC might include morphological mimickers, which can be genetically classified into other tumor types, including pleomorphic adenoma and adenoid cystic carcinoma.
期刊介绍:
Manuscripts of original studies reinforcing the evidence base of modern diagnostic pathology, using immunocytochemical, molecular and ultrastructural techniques, will be welcomed. In addition, papers on critical evaluation of diagnostic criteria but also broadsheets and guidelines with a solid evidence base will be considered. Consideration will also be given to reports of work in other fields relevant to the understanding of human pathology as well as manuscripts on the application of new methods and techniques in pathology. Submission of purely experimental articles is discouraged but manuscripts on experimental work applicable to diagnostic pathology are welcomed. Biomarker studies are welcomed but need to abide by strict rules (e.g. REMARK) of adequate sample size and relevant marker choice. Single marker studies on limited patient series without validated application will as a rule not be considered. Case reports will only be considered when they provide substantial new information with an impact on understanding disease or diagnostic practice.