电针治疗偏头痛的随机对照试验的系统评价和meta分析。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Pain Research Pub Date : 2025-05-06 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JPR.S518294
ShiWei Song, Hao Chen
{"title":"电针治疗偏头痛的随机对照试验的系统评价和meta分析。","authors":"ShiWei Song, Hao Chen","doi":"10.2147/JPR.S518294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Numerous clinical studies have shown that patients with migraine can benefit from electroacupuncture treatment. However, there are no published systematic reviews and meta-analyses of pure electroacupuncture for migraine. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of pure electroacupuncture as a standalone treatment for migraine patients.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We searched Six electronic databases. All from the inception to August 1st, 2024. In the literature, clinical investigators evaluated the efficacy and safety of electroacupuncture as the primary treatment for migraine. Researchers assessed the quality of the studies using the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The Review Manager 5.4 software was used to perform statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten randomized controlled trials involving 1161 people were included. The meta-analysis yielded a substantial result: the application of pure electroacupuncture significantly improved the effective rate compared to the control group. In the visual analogue scale score, the present study found no significant difference between electroacupuncture and Western medicine as standalone treatments. Regarding migraine-associated symptom scores, the experimental group exhibited no superiority in comparison to the control group. Moreover, following the intervention, several significant changes were observed in the secondary outcome indicators between the two groups, including cerebral arterial blood flow velocity, the migraine attack days, the lasting time of headache remission, mean time of the headache attack, duration of the headache attack, and the migraine-specific quality of life questionnaire score, with the results proving to be statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of the analysis suggested that pure electroacupuncture is beneficial for migraine patients, but it remains difficult to obtain comprehensive data. Our study is supported by evidence of low to moderate quality. It is necessary to further confirm the efficacy of pure electroacupuncture for migraine with higher-quality clinical research.</p>","PeriodicalId":16661,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain Research","volume":"18 ","pages":"2321-2333"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12065461/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials for Electroacupuncture Treatment of Migraine.\",\"authors\":\"ShiWei Song, Hao Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/JPR.S518294\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Numerous clinical studies have shown that patients with migraine can benefit from electroacupuncture treatment. However, there are no published systematic reviews and meta-analyses of pure electroacupuncture for migraine. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of pure electroacupuncture as a standalone treatment for migraine patients.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We searched Six electronic databases. All from the inception to August 1st, 2024. In the literature, clinical investigators evaluated the efficacy and safety of electroacupuncture as the primary treatment for migraine. Researchers assessed the quality of the studies using the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The Review Manager 5.4 software was used to perform statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten randomized controlled trials involving 1161 people were included. The meta-analysis yielded a substantial result: the application of pure electroacupuncture significantly improved the effective rate compared to the control group. In the visual analogue scale score, the present study found no significant difference between electroacupuncture and Western medicine as standalone treatments. Regarding migraine-associated symptom scores, the experimental group exhibited no superiority in comparison to the control group. Moreover, following the intervention, several significant changes were observed in the secondary outcome indicators between the two groups, including cerebral arterial blood flow velocity, the migraine attack days, the lasting time of headache remission, mean time of the headache attack, duration of the headache attack, and the migraine-specific quality of life questionnaire score, with the results proving to be statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of the analysis suggested that pure electroacupuncture is beneficial for migraine patients, but it remains difficult to obtain comprehensive data. Our study is supported by evidence of low to moderate quality. It is necessary to further confirm the efficacy of pure electroacupuncture for migraine with higher-quality clinical research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16661,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pain Research\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"2321-2333\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12065461/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pain Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S518294\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S518294","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:大量的临床研究表明,偏头痛患者可以从电针治疗中获益。然而,目前还没有发表过关于纯电针治疗偏头痛的系统综述和荟萃分析。因此,我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以评估纯电针作为偏头痛患者独立治疗的疗效。患者和方法:检索6个电子数据库。从开始到2024年8月1日。在文献中,临床研究者评估了电针作为偏头痛的主要治疗方法的有效性和安全性。研究人员使用Cochrane干预措施系统评价手册来评估研究的质量。使用Review Manager 5.4软件进行统计分析。结果:纳入10项随机对照试验,共1161人。荟萃分析得出了一个实质性的结果:与对照组相比,纯电针的应用显著提高了有效率。在视觉模拟量表评分上,本研究发现电针与西医单独治疗无显著差异。在偏头痛相关症状评分方面,实验组与对照组相比没有表现出优势。干预后,两组脑动脉血流速度、偏头痛发作天数、头痛缓解持续时间、平均头痛发作时间、头痛发作持续时间、偏头痛特异性生活质量问卷得分等次要结局指标发生显著变化,差异均有统计学意义。结论:分析结果提示纯电针对偏头痛患者有益,但仍难以获得全面的数据。我们的研究得到了低到中等质量证据的支持。纯电针治疗偏头痛的疗效有待更高质量的临床研究进一步证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials for Electroacupuncture Treatment of Migraine.

Purpose: Numerous clinical studies have shown that patients with migraine can benefit from electroacupuncture treatment. However, there are no published systematic reviews and meta-analyses of pure electroacupuncture for migraine. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of pure electroacupuncture as a standalone treatment for migraine patients.

Patients and methods: We searched Six electronic databases. All from the inception to August 1st, 2024. In the literature, clinical investigators evaluated the efficacy and safety of electroacupuncture as the primary treatment for migraine. Researchers assessed the quality of the studies using the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The Review Manager 5.4 software was used to perform statistical analysis.

Results: Ten randomized controlled trials involving 1161 people were included. The meta-analysis yielded a substantial result: the application of pure electroacupuncture significantly improved the effective rate compared to the control group. In the visual analogue scale score, the present study found no significant difference between electroacupuncture and Western medicine as standalone treatments. Regarding migraine-associated symptom scores, the experimental group exhibited no superiority in comparison to the control group. Moreover, following the intervention, several significant changes were observed in the secondary outcome indicators between the two groups, including cerebral arterial blood flow velocity, the migraine attack days, the lasting time of headache remission, mean time of the headache attack, duration of the headache attack, and the migraine-specific quality of life questionnaire score, with the results proving to be statistically significant.

Conclusion: The results of the analysis suggested that pure electroacupuncture is beneficial for migraine patients, but it remains difficult to obtain comprehensive data. Our study is supported by evidence of low to moderate quality. It is necessary to further confirm the efficacy of pure electroacupuncture for migraine with higher-quality clinical research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pain Research
Journal of Pain Research CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
411
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Pain Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that welcomes laboratory and clinical findings in the fields of pain research and the prevention and management of pain. Original research, reviews, symposium reports, hypothesis formation and commentaries are all considered for publication. Additionally, the journal now welcomes the submission of pain-policy-related editorials and commentaries, particularly in regard to ethical, regulatory, forensic, and other legal issues in pain medicine, and to the education of pain practitioners and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信