外伤性颈脊髓和脊柱损伤的临床流行病学、治疗和结局:对1645例合并病例的系统回顾。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Promise T Jaja, Linda Iroegbu-Emeruem, Iqra Kulsoom, Amechi Odeku
{"title":"外伤性颈脊髓和脊柱损伤的临床流行病学、治疗和结局:对1645例合并病例的系统回顾。","authors":"Promise T Jaja, Linda Iroegbu-Emeruem, Iqra Kulsoom, Amechi Odeku","doi":"10.23736/S0390-5616.25.06404-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cervical spine (mostly atlanto-axial) accounts for over half of the acute traumatic disruptions of the spinal cord and its coverings; alongside its persisting neurological deficits. Two-thirds of the etiology were fairly evenly distributed between traffic crashes, falls, assault and other occupation-related injuries. We described the etiological mechanisms, neuro-anatomical level, severity, treatment and outcomes of traumatic cervical spinal-cord and spine injuries (C-SCI+SI).</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>We systematically reviewed PubMed and Cochrane CENTRAL on 16th May 2023, using a prospectively registered protocol (CRD42023417530). The search strategy combined search words (from the keywords; \"cervical spinal cord injury,\" \"conservative\" and \"operative\" \"treatment\") using Boolean operators. These yielded 787 and 55 records from PubMed (then 223 after delimiting to 10 years) and CENTRAL respectively; after records screening, 106 and 1 record were relevant respectively. Seventy-six reports were recruited for the quasi-quantitative synthesis following full-text review and methodological quality/bias assessment (using Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools).</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Seventy-six reports yielded 1645 pooled cases. Weighted-mean age (N.=1512) was 46.3 years, with male (70.2%; gender N.=1525) preponderance. C-SCI+SI were mostly caused (N.=1079) by falls (42.1%) and road traffic crashes (42.2%); presenting(N.=178) with neck pain (71.4%) mostly and under one-fifth had neurological deficits (-plegias or -paresis, 11.8%; radiculopathy, 6.2%). The commonest vertebral levels (N.=1525) were 23.9% for the second cervical vertebra (c2), c5(20.4%) and c6(20.0%). Treatment (N.=1297) was combined pre-operative non-operative [skull traction (72.0%/842), cervical collar (13.9%/163)] in 90.2%, with solely non-operative (33.9%/439) options also used. Operative implant-based arthrodeses (66.2%/858) were done, using anterior (68.5%), posterior (20.2%/173) and combined (10.4%/89) approaches. Good bony fusion (89.0%) and clinical improvements (43.2%) were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mostly low-level evidence showed C-SCI+SI occurring more amongst the middle-aged and men; following falls or road traffic crashes. The second, fifth and sixth cervical levels are mostly affected; with excellent post-intervention bony-union, with neurological improvements in two-fifths. Better international reporting standards are advocated.</p>","PeriodicalId":16504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgical sciences","volume":"69 2","pages":"187-199"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical epidemiology, management and outcomes of traumatic cervical spinal-cord and spine injuries: a systematic review of 1645 pooled cases.\",\"authors\":\"Promise T Jaja, Linda Iroegbu-Emeruem, Iqra Kulsoom, Amechi Odeku\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0390-5616.25.06404-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cervical spine (mostly atlanto-axial) accounts for over half of the acute traumatic disruptions of the spinal cord and its coverings; alongside its persisting neurological deficits. Two-thirds of the etiology were fairly evenly distributed between traffic crashes, falls, assault and other occupation-related injuries. We described the etiological mechanisms, neuro-anatomical level, severity, treatment and outcomes of traumatic cervical spinal-cord and spine injuries (C-SCI+SI).</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>We systematically reviewed PubMed and Cochrane CENTRAL on 16th May 2023, using a prospectively registered protocol (CRD42023417530). The search strategy combined search words (from the keywords; \\\"cervical spinal cord injury,\\\" \\\"conservative\\\" and \\\"operative\\\" \\\"treatment\\\") using Boolean operators. These yielded 787 and 55 records from PubMed (then 223 after delimiting to 10 years) and CENTRAL respectively; after records screening, 106 and 1 record were relevant respectively. Seventy-six reports were recruited for the quasi-quantitative synthesis following full-text review and methodological quality/bias assessment (using Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools).</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Seventy-six reports yielded 1645 pooled cases. Weighted-mean age (N.=1512) was 46.3 years, with male (70.2%; gender N.=1525) preponderance. C-SCI+SI were mostly caused (N.=1079) by falls (42.1%) and road traffic crashes (42.2%); presenting(N.=178) with neck pain (71.4%) mostly and under one-fifth had neurological deficits (-plegias or -paresis, 11.8%; radiculopathy, 6.2%). The commonest vertebral levels (N.=1525) were 23.9% for the second cervical vertebra (c2), c5(20.4%) and c6(20.0%). Treatment (N.=1297) was combined pre-operative non-operative [skull traction (72.0%/842), cervical collar (13.9%/163)] in 90.2%, with solely non-operative (33.9%/439) options also used. Operative implant-based arthrodeses (66.2%/858) were done, using anterior (68.5%), posterior (20.2%/173) and combined (10.4%/89) approaches. Good bony fusion (89.0%) and clinical improvements (43.2%) were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mostly low-level evidence showed C-SCI+SI occurring more amongst the middle-aged and men; following falls or road traffic crashes. The second, fifth and sixth cervical levels are mostly affected; with excellent post-intervention bony-union, with neurological improvements in two-fifths. Better international reporting standards are advocated.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurosurgical sciences\",\"volume\":\"69 2\",\"pages\":\"187-199\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurosurgical sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0390-5616.25.06404-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0390-5616.25.06404-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

颈椎(主要是寰枢椎)占脊髓及其覆盖物急性创伤性破坏的一半以上;还有持续的神经缺陷。三分之二的病因相当均匀地分布在交通事故、跌倒、袭击和其他与职业有关的伤害之间。我们描述了外伤性颈椎脊髓和脊柱损伤(C-SCI+SI)的病因机制、神经解剖水平、严重程度、治疗和结局。证据获取:我们使用前瞻性注册方案(CRD42023417530),于2023年5月16日系统地回顾了PubMed和Cochrane CENTRAL。搜索策略结合搜索词(从关键词;“颈脊髓损伤”,“保守”和“手术”,“治疗”)使用布尔运算符。这些分别从PubMed和CENTRAL中获得了787条和55条记录(划分到10年后为223条);经记录筛选,相关记录106条,相关记录1条。在全文审查和方法学质量/偏差评估(使用乔安娜布里格斯研究所的关键评估工具)之后,招募了76份报告进行准定量综合。证据综合:76份报告产生了1645例合并病例。加权平均年龄(n =1512)为46.3岁,其中男性占70.2%;(性别)优势。C-SCI+SI主要由跌倒(42.1%)和道路交通碰撞(42.2%)引起(n =1079);以颈部疼痛(71.4%)为主要表现(178例),五分之一以下患者有神经功能缺陷(-瘫痪或-瘫瘫,11.8%);神经根病,6.2%)。第二颈椎(c2)、c5(20.4%)和c6(20.0%)最常见的椎体水平(n =1525)为23.9%。1297例患者采用术前非手术联合治疗[颅骨牵引(72.0%/842),颈套(13.9%/163)]占90.2%,单独非手术治疗(33.9%/439)。采用前路(68.5%)、后路(20.2%/173)和联合入路(10.4%/89)行植体关节固定术(66.2%/858)。骨性融合良好(89.0%),临床改善(43.2%)。结论:低水平证据显示,C-SCI+SI多见于中年人和男性;在跌倒或道路交通事故后。第二、第五及第六颈椎节段受影响最大;术后骨愈合良好,五分之二的患者神经系统得到改善。提倡更好的国际报告标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical epidemiology, management and outcomes of traumatic cervical spinal-cord and spine injuries: a systematic review of 1645 pooled cases.

Introduction: Cervical spine (mostly atlanto-axial) accounts for over half of the acute traumatic disruptions of the spinal cord and its coverings; alongside its persisting neurological deficits. Two-thirds of the etiology were fairly evenly distributed between traffic crashes, falls, assault and other occupation-related injuries. We described the etiological mechanisms, neuro-anatomical level, severity, treatment and outcomes of traumatic cervical spinal-cord and spine injuries (C-SCI+SI).

Evidence acquisition: We systematically reviewed PubMed and Cochrane CENTRAL on 16th May 2023, using a prospectively registered protocol (CRD42023417530). The search strategy combined search words (from the keywords; "cervical spinal cord injury," "conservative" and "operative" "treatment") using Boolean operators. These yielded 787 and 55 records from PubMed (then 223 after delimiting to 10 years) and CENTRAL respectively; after records screening, 106 and 1 record were relevant respectively. Seventy-six reports were recruited for the quasi-quantitative synthesis following full-text review and methodological quality/bias assessment (using Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools).

Evidence synthesis: Seventy-six reports yielded 1645 pooled cases. Weighted-mean age (N.=1512) was 46.3 years, with male (70.2%; gender N.=1525) preponderance. C-SCI+SI were mostly caused (N.=1079) by falls (42.1%) and road traffic crashes (42.2%); presenting(N.=178) with neck pain (71.4%) mostly and under one-fifth had neurological deficits (-plegias or -paresis, 11.8%; radiculopathy, 6.2%). The commonest vertebral levels (N.=1525) were 23.9% for the second cervical vertebra (c2), c5(20.4%) and c6(20.0%). Treatment (N.=1297) was combined pre-operative non-operative [skull traction (72.0%/842), cervical collar (13.9%/163)] in 90.2%, with solely non-operative (33.9%/439) options also used. Operative implant-based arthrodeses (66.2%/858) were done, using anterior (68.5%), posterior (20.2%/173) and combined (10.4%/89) approaches. Good bony fusion (89.0%) and clinical improvements (43.2%) were reported.

Conclusions: Mostly low-level evidence showed C-SCI+SI occurring more amongst the middle-aged and men; following falls or road traffic crashes. The second, fifth and sixth cervical levels are mostly affected; with excellent post-intervention bony-union, with neurological improvements in two-fifths. Better international reporting standards are advocated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgical sciences
Journal of neurosurgical sciences CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
202
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences publishes scientific papers on neurosurgery and related subjects (electroencephalography, neurophysiology, neurochemistry, neuropathology, stereotaxy, neuroanatomy, neuroradiology, etc.). Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of ditorials, original articles, review articles, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines. The journal aims to provide its readers with papers of the highest quality and impact through a process of careful peer review and editorial work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信