Promise T Jaja, Linda Iroegbu-Emeruem, Iqra Kulsoom, Amechi Odeku
{"title":"外伤性颈脊髓和脊柱损伤的临床流行病学、治疗和结局:对1645例合并病例的系统回顾。","authors":"Promise T Jaja, Linda Iroegbu-Emeruem, Iqra Kulsoom, Amechi Odeku","doi":"10.23736/S0390-5616.25.06404-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cervical spine (mostly atlanto-axial) accounts for over half of the acute traumatic disruptions of the spinal cord and its coverings; alongside its persisting neurological deficits. Two-thirds of the etiology were fairly evenly distributed between traffic crashes, falls, assault and other occupation-related injuries. We described the etiological mechanisms, neuro-anatomical level, severity, treatment and outcomes of traumatic cervical spinal-cord and spine injuries (C-SCI+SI).</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>We systematically reviewed PubMed and Cochrane CENTRAL on 16th May 2023, using a prospectively registered protocol (CRD42023417530). The search strategy combined search words (from the keywords; \"cervical spinal cord injury,\" \"conservative\" and \"operative\" \"treatment\") using Boolean operators. These yielded 787 and 55 records from PubMed (then 223 after delimiting to 10 years) and CENTRAL respectively; after records screening, 106 and 1 record were relevant respectively. Seventy-six reports were recruited for the quasi-quantitative synthesis following full-text review and methodological quality/bias assessment (using Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools).</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Seventy-six reports yielded 1645 pooled cases. Weighted-mean age (N.=1512) was 46.3 years, with male (70.2%; gender N.=1525) preponderance. C-SCI+SI were mostly caused (N.=1079) by falls (42.1%) and road traffic crashes (42.2%); presenting(N.=178) with neck pain (71.4%) mostly and under one-fifth had neurological deficits (-plegias or -paresis, 11.8%; radiculopathy, 6.2%). The commonest vertebral levels (N.=1525) were 23.9% for the second cervical vertebra (c2), c5(20.4%) and c6(20.0%). Treatment (N.=1297) was combined pre-operative non-operative [skull traction (72.0%/842), cervical collar (13.9%/163)] in 90.2%, with solely non-operative (33.9%/439) options also used. Operative implant-based arthrodeses (66.2%/858) were done, using anterior (68.5%), posterior (20.2%/173) and combined (10.4%/89) approaches. Good bony fusion (89.0%) and clinical improvements (43.2%) were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mostly low-level evidence showed C-SCI+SI occurring more amongst the middle-aged and men; following falls or road traffic crashes. The second, fifth and sixth cervical levels are mostly affected; with excellent post-intervention bony-union, with neurological improvements in two-fifths. Better international reporting standards are advocated.</p>","PeriodicalId":16504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgical sciences","volume":"69 2","pages":"187-199"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical epidemiology, management and outcomes of traumatic cervical spinal-cord and spine injuries: a systematic review of 1645 pooled cases.\",\"authors\":\"Promise T Jaja, Linda Iroegbu-Emeruem, Iqra Kulsoom, Amechi Odeku\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0390-5616.25.06404-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cervical spine (mostly atlanto-axial) accounts for over half of the acute traumatic disruptions of the spinal cord and its coverings; alongside its persisting neurological deficits. Two-thirds of the etiology were fairly evenly distributed between traffic crashes, falls, assault and other occupation-related injuries. We described the etiological mechanisms, neuro-anatomical level, severity, treatment and outcomes of traumatic cervical spinal-cord and spine injuries (C-SCI+SI).</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>We systematically reviewed PubMed and Cochrane CENTRAL on 16th May 2023, using a prospectively registered protocol (CRD42023417530). The search strategy combined search words (from the keywords; \\\"cervical spinal cord injury,\\\" \\\"conservative\\\" and \\\"operative\\\" \\\"treatment\\\") using Boolean operators. These yielded 787 and 55 records from PubMed (then 223 after delimiting to 10 years) and CENTRAL respectively; after records screening, 106 and 1 record were relevant respectively. Seventy-six reports were recruited for the quasi-quantitative synthesis following full-text review and methodological quality/bias assessment (using Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools).</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Seventy-six reports yielded 1645 pooled cases. Weighted-mean age (N.=1512) was 46.3 years, with male (70.2%; gender N.=1525) preponderance. C-SCI+SI were mostly caused (N.=1079) by falls (42.1%) and road traffic crashes (42.2%); presenting(N.=178) with neck pain (71.4%) mostly and under one-fifth had neurological deficits (-plegias or -paresis, 11.8%; radiculopathy, 6.2%). The commonest vertebral levels (N.=1525) were 23.9% for the second cervical vertebra (c2), c5(20.4%) and c6(20.0%). Treatment (N.=1297) was combined pre-operative non-operative [skull traction (72.0%/842), cervical collar (13.9%/163)] in 90.2%, with solely non-operative (33.9%/439) options also used. Operative implant-based arthrodeses (66.2%/858) were done, using anterior (68.5%), posterior (20.2%/173) and combined (10.4%/89) approaches. Good bony fusion (89.0%) and clinical improvements (43.2%) were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mostly low-level evidence showed C-SCI+SI occurring more amongst the middle-aged and men; following falls or road traffic crashes. The second, fifth and sixth cervical levels are mostly affected; with excellent post-intervention bony-union, with neurological improvements in two-fifths. Better international reporting standards are advocated.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurosurgical sciences\",\"volume\":\"69 2\",\"pages\":\"187-199\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurosurgical sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0390-5616.25.06404-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0390-5616.25.06404-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinical epidemiology, management and outcomes of traumatic cervical spinal-cord and spine injuries: a systematic review of 1645 pooled cases.
Introduction: Cervical spine (mostly atlanto-axial) accounts for over half of the acute traumatic disruptions of the spinal cord and its coverings; alongside its persisting neurological deficits. Two-thirds of the etiology were fairly evenly distributed between traffic crashes, falls, assault and other occupation-related injuries. We described the etiological mechanisms, neuro-anatomical level, severity, treatment and outcomes of traumatic cervical spinal-cord and spine injuries (C-SCI+SI).
Evidence acquisition: We systematically reviewed PubMed and Cochrane CENTRAL on 16th May 2023, using a prospectively registered protocol (CRD42023417530). The search strategy combined search words (from the keywords; "cervical spinal cord injury," "conservative" and "operative" "treatment") using Boolean operators. These yielded 787 and 55 records from PubMed (then 223 after delimiting to 10 years) and CENTRAL respectively; after records screening, 106 and 1 record were relevant respectively. Seventy-six reports were recruited for the quasi-quantitative synthesis following full-text review and methodological quality/bias assessment (using Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools).
Evidence synthesis: Seventy-six reports yielded 1645 pooled cases. Weighted-mean age (N.=1512) was 46.3 years, with male (70.2%; gender N.=1525) preponderance. C-SCI+SI were mostly caused (N.=1079) by falls (42.1%) and road traffic crashes (42.2%); presenting(N.=178) with neck pain (71.4%) mostly and under one-fifth had neurological deficits (-plegias or -paresis, 11.8%; radiculopathy, 6.2%). The commonest vertebral levels (N.=1525) were 23.9% for the second cervical vertebra (c2), c5(20.4%) and c6(20.0%). Treatment (N.=1297) was combined pre-operative non-operative [skull traction (72.0%/842), cervical collar (13.9%/163)] in 90.2%, with solely non-operative (33.9%/439) options also used. Operative implant-based arthrodeses (66.2%/858) were done, using anterior (68.5%), posterior (20.2%/173) and combined (10.4%/89) approaches. Good bony fusion (89.0%) and clinical improvements (43.2%) were reported.
Conclusions: Mostly low-level evidence showed C-SCI+SI occurring more amongst the middle-aged and men; following falls or road traffic crashes. The second, fifth and sixth cervical levels are mostly affected; with excellent post-intervention bony-union, with neurological improvements in two-fifths. Better international reporting standards are advocated.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences publishes scientific papers on neurosurgery and related subjects (electroencephalography, neurophysiology, neurochemistry, neuropathology, stereotaxy, neuroanatomy, neuroradiology, etc.). Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of ditorials, original articles, review articles, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines. The journal aims to provide its readers with papers of the highest quality and impact through a process of careful peer review and editorial work.