不同制造工艺下陶瓷贴面烧结金属与铸造金属修复内部精度的比较。

Q1 Dentistry
Sanephume Sripairojn, Niwut Juntavee, Apa Juntavee
{"title":"不同制造工艺下陶瓷贴面烧结金属与铸造金属修复内部精度的比较。","authors":"Sanephume Sripairojn, Niwut Juntavee, Apa Juntavee","doi":"10.1055/s-0045-1807730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>One critical factor that influences clinical outcomes of fixed dental restorations is the internal gaps between the restoration and the abutment tooth. However, investigating these gaps in the context of fabrication processes with new technologies is few. This study compared internal accuracy of sintered versus cast metal substructures upon different fabrication techniques, veneered with layering and press-on ceramic, during different construction stages, at different sites of restoration.A total of 96 metal substructures were fabricated with a standardized dimension from four techniques: cast metal with traditionally impressed tooth [CmTt], cast metal with digitally milled wax [CmDw], sintered metal with digitally impressed tooth [SmDt], and sintered metal with digitally impressed stone model [SmDm]. They were further subdivided into two subgroups according to the veneering ceramic used [layered (Pl) and press-on (Pp)]. Internal accuracy was evaluated at gingival, gingiva-axial, axial, axio-occlusal, and occlusal locations using silicone replica, after metal coping (As), degassing (De), opaque application (Op), contouring (Co), and glazing (Gl).Analysis of variance and Bonferroni tests were analyzed for significant differences of internal fit upon different factors (<i>α</i> = 0.05).Significantly different internal accuracy was found upon metal substructures fabrication technique, veneering methods, stages, and sites of restoration (<i>p</i> < 0.05). SmDt and SmDm revealed significantly better fit than CmTt and CmDw (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Pp generated significantly better fit than Pl (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Significantly increasing gaps were found upon stages (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Occlusal and axio-occlusal sites exhibited larger gaps than axial, gingivo-axial, and gingival sites (<i>p</i> < 0.05). However, all groups exhibited clinically acceptable internal accuracy.Increasing internal inaccuracies upon stages of fabrication were noticed, with highly observed at the occlusal and axio-occlusal sites. Sintered metal (SmDt, SmDw) provided better accuracy than cast metal (CmTt, CmDw) while press-on veneering generated better accuracy than the layering method. Ceramic press-on sintered metal was suggested for fabrication restoration.</p>","PeriodicalId":12028,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Internal Accuracy of Ceramic Veneered Sintered Metal versus Cast Metal Restoration Upon Different Fabrication Processes.\",\"authors\":\"Sanephume Sripairojn, Niwut Juntavee, Apa Juntavee\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0045-1807730\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>One critical factor that influences clinical outcomes of fixed dental restorations is the internal gaps between the restoration and the abutment tooth. However, investigating these gaps in the context of fabrication processes with new technologies is few. This study compared internal accuracy of sintered versus cast metal substructures upon different fabrication techniques, veneered with layering and press-on ceramic, during different construction stages, at different sites of restoration.A total of 96 metal substructures were fabricated with a standardized dimension from four techniques: cast metal with traditionally impressed tooth [CmTt], cast metal with digitally milled wax [CmDw], sintered metal with digitally impressed tooth [SmDt], and sintered metal with digitally impressed stone model [SmDm]. They were further subdivided into two subgroups according to the veneering ceramic used [layered (Pl) and press-on (Pp)]. Internal accuracy was evaluated at gingival, gingiva-axial, axial, axio-occlusal, and occlusal locations using silicone replica, after metal coping (As), degassing (De), opaque application (Op), contouring (Co), and glazing (Gl).Analysis of variance and Bonferroni tests were analyzed for significant differences of internal fit upon different factors (<i>α</i> = 0.05).Significantly different internal accuracy was found upon metal substructures fabrication technique, veneering methods, stages, and sites of restoration (<i>p</i> < 0.05). SmDt and SmDm revealed significantly better fit than CmTt and CmDw (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Pp generated significantly better fit than Pl (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Significantly increasing gaps were found upon stages (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Occlusal and axio-occlusal sites exhibited larger gaps than axial, gingivo-axial, and gingival sites (<i>p</i> < 0.05). However, all groups exhibited clinically acceptable internal accuracy.Increasing internal inaccuracies upon stages of fabrication were noticed, with highly observed at the occlusal and axio-occlusal sites. Sintered metal (SmDt, SmDw) provided better accuracy than cast metal (CmTt, CmDw) while press-on veneering generated better accuracy than the layering method. Ceramic press-on sintered metal was suggested for fabrication restoration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Dentistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0045-1807730\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0045-1807730","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

影响固定牙修复体临床效果的一个关键因素是修复体与基牙之间的内部间隙。然而,在新技术制造过程的背景下调查这些差距是很少的。本研究在不同的施工阶段、不同的修复地点,比较了不同制造技术下烧结金属和铸造金属子结构的内部精度,并采用分层和压陶瓷贴面。共有96个金属子结构通过四种技术以标准化尺寸制造:传统压印齿铸造金属[CmTt],数字磨蜡铸造金属[CmDw],数字压印齿烧结金属[SmDt]和数字压印石模型烧结金属[SmDm]。根据所使用的贴面陶瓷,它们被进一步细分为两个亚组[层状(Pl)和压型(Pp)]。使用硅胶模型评估牙龈、牙龈轴向、轴向、轴向咬合和咬合位置的内部精度,并进行金属覆盖(As)、脱气(De)、不透明应用(Op)、轮廓(Co)和上光(Gl)。采用方差分析和Bonferroni检验,不同因素的内拟合差异有统计学意义(α = 0.05)。内部精度在金属子结构制造技术、贴面方法、阶段和修复地点上存在显著差异(p p p p p)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Internal Accuracy of Ceramic Veneered Sintered Metal versus Cast Metal Restoration Upon Different Fabrication Processes.

One critical factor that influences clinical outcomes of fixed dental restorations is the internal gaps between the restoration and the abutment tooth. However, investigating these gaps in the context of fabrication processes with new technologies is few. This study compared internal accuracy of sintered versus cast metal substructures upon different fabrication techniques, veneered with layering and press-on ceramic, during different construction stages, at different sites of restoration.A total of 96 metal substructures were fabricated with a standardized dimension from four techniques: cast metal with traditionally impressed tooth [CmTt], cast metal with digitally milled wax [CmDw], sintered metal with digitally impressed tooth [SmDt], and sintered metal with digitally impressed stone model [SmDm]. They were further subdivided into two subgroups according to the veneering ceramic used [layered (Pl) and press-on (Pp)]. Internal accuracy was evaluated at gingival, gingiva-axial, axial, axio-occlusal, and occlusal locations using silicone replica, after metal coping (As), degassing (De), opaque application (Op), contouring (Co), and glazing (Gl).Analysis of variance and Bonferroni tests were analyzed for significant differences of internal fit upon different factors (α = 0.05).Significantly different internal accuracy was found upon metal substructures fabrication technique, veneering methods, stages, and sites of restoration (p < 0.05). SmDt and SmDm revealed significantly better fit than CmTt and CmDw (p < 0.05). Pp generated significantly better fit than Pl (p < 0.05). Significantly increasing gaps were found upon stages (p < 0.05). Occlusal and axio-occlusal sites exhibited larger gaps than axial, gingivo-axial, and gingival sites (p < 0.05). However, all groups exhibited clinically acceptable internal accuracy.Increasing internal inaccuracies upon stages of fabrication were noticed, with highly observed at the occlusal and axio-occlusal sites. Sintered metal (SmDt, SmDw) provided better accuracy than cast metal (CmTt, CmDw) while press-on veneering generated better accuracy than the layering method. Ceramic press-on sintered metal was suggested for fabrication restoration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Dentistry
European Journal of Dentistry Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
161
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Dentistry is the official journal of the Dental Investigations Society, based in Turkey. It is a double-blinded peer-reviewed, Open Access, multi-disciplinary international journal addressing various aspects of dentistry. The journal''s board consists of eminent investigators in dentistry from across the globe and presents an ideal international composition. The journal encourages its authors to submit original investigations, reviews, and reports addressing various divisions of dentistry including oral pathology, prosthodontics, endodontics, orthodontics etc. It is available both online and in print.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信