Mikhail Saltychev, Annika Miikkulainen, Juhani Juhola
{"title":"肉毒毒素治疗颈肩肌筋膜疼痛的疗效——系统回顾和meta分析。","authors":"Mikhail Saltychev, Annika Miikkulainen, Juhani Juhola","doi":"10.1097/MRR.0000000000000669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While botulinum toxin injections (BTX-A) have been long used to treat myofascial pain (MFP) in the neck and shoulder region, the evidence of its effectiveness remained unclear. Thus, we aimed to examine the existing evidence on the efficacy of BTX-A injections for reducing MFP in the neck and shoulder areas. This was a systematic review of Medline, Embase, Cinahl, Scopus, and Central databases. Only randomized controlled trials were included. Random effects meta-analysis with effect size index as weighted mean difference (WMD) was applied. The search resulted in 100 records, of them seven were considered relevant and included in the meta-analysis. In total, the data from 261 patients were analyzed. Five trials focused on entire neck/upper back and shoulder pain, one on the infraspinatus muscle and one on the trapezius muscle. The dose of BTX-A varied from 20 to 400 UI. The risk of systematic bias was high for three trials and low for four trials. The pooled WMD was statistically significant [-10.22 (95% confidence interval (CI) -12.77 to -7.68)] on a scale from 0 to 100 in favor of BTX-A over sham. However, the difference was not clinically significant. Also, the meta-regression coefficient was insignificant [-0.01 (95% CI -0.04 to 0.02)]. The overall quality of evidence was moderate. In conclusion, there is moderate evidence that BTX-A injections are not more effective than saline injections to treat MFP in the neck and shoulder region. The effect of BTX-A did not exceed the level of clinical significance. So far, BTX-A cannot be recommended for clinical use when dealing with MFP in the neck and shoulder.</p>","PeriodicalId":14301,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Rehabilitation Research","volume":"48 2","pages":"83-89"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of botulinum toxin in myofascial pain in neck and shoulder-systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Mikhail Saltychev, Annika Miikkulainen, Juhani Juhola\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MRR.0000000000000669\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>While botulinum toxin injections (BTX-A) have been long used to treat myofascial pain (MFP) in the neck and shoulder region, the evidence of its effectiveness remained unclear. Thus, we aimed to examine the existing evidence on the efficacy of BTX-A injections for reducing MFP in the neck and shoulder areas. This was a systematic review of Medline, Embase, Cinahl, Scopus, and Central databases. Only randomized controlled trials were included. Random effects meta-analysis with effect size index as weighted mean difference (WMD) was applied. The search resulted in 100 records, of them seven were considered relevant and included in the meta-analysis. In total, the data from 261 patients were analyzed. Five trials focused on entire neck/upper back and shoulder pain, one on the infraspinatus muscle and one on the trapezius muscle. The dose of BTX-A varied from 20 to 400 UI. The risk of systematic bias was high for three trials and low for four trials. The pooled WMD was statistically significant [-10.22 (95% confidence interval (CI) -12.77 to -7.68)] on a scale from 0 to 100 in favor of BTX-A over sham. However, the difference was not clinically significant. Also, the meta-regression coefficient was insignificant [-0.01 (95% CI -0.04 to 0.02)]. The overall quality of evidence was moderate. In conclusion, there is moderate evidence that BTX-A injections are not more effective than saline injections to treat MFP in the neck and shoulder region. The effect of BTX-A did not exceed the level of clinical significance. So far, BTX-A cannot be recommended for clinical use when dealing with MFP in the neck and shoulder.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14301,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Rehabilitation Research\",\"volume\":\"48 2\",\"pages\":\"83-89\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Rehabilitation Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000669\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Rehabilitation Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000669","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
虽然肉毒毒素注射(BTX-A)长期以来一直用于治疗颈部和肩部肌筋膜疼痛(MFP),但其有效性的证据仍不清楚。因此,我们的目的是检查BTX-A注射对降低颈部和肩部MFP的有效性的现有证据。这是Medline, Embase, Cinahl, Scopus和Central数据库的系统综述。仅纳入随机对照试验。采用随机效应荟萃分析,效应大小指数为加权平均差(WMD)。搜索结果为100条记录,其中7条被认为是相关的,并被纳入元分析。总共分析了261名患者的数据。五项试验集中于整个颈部/上背部和肩部疼痛,一项针对冈下肌,另一项针对斜方肌。BTX-A的剂量从20至400单位不等。系统性偏倚的风险在3个试验中较高,在4个试验中较低。综合WMD在0到100的范围内具有统计学意义[-10.22(95%可信区间(CI) -12.77至-7.68)],BTX-A优于sham。然而,差异无临床意义。元回归系数也不显著[-0.01 (95% CI -0.04 ~ 0.02)]。证据的总体质量为中等。总之,有中度证据表明BTX-A注射治疗颈肩部MFP并不比生理盐水注射更有效。BTX-A的疗效未超过临床意义水平。到目前为止,BTX-A在治疗颈部和肩部的MFP时不推荐用于临床。
Efficacy of botulinum toxin in myofascial pain in neck and shoulder-systematic review and meta-analysis.
While botulinum toxin injections (BTX-A) have been long used to treat myofascial pain (MFP) in the neck and shoulder region, the evidence of its effectiveness remained unclear. Thus, we aimed to examine the existing evidence on the efficacy of BTX-A injections for reducing MFP in the neck and shoulder areas. This was a systematic review of Medline, Embase, Cinahl, Scopus, and Central databases. Only randomized controlled trials were included. Random effects meta-analysis with effect size index as weighted mean difference (WMD) was applied. The search resulted in 100 records, of them seven were considered relevant and included in the meta-analysis. In total, the data from 261 patients were analyzed. Five trials focused on entire neck/upper back and shoulder pain, one on the infraspinatus muscle and one on the trapezius muscle. The dose of BTX-A varied from 20 to 400 UI. The risk of systematic bias was high for three trials and low for four trials. The pooled WMD was statistically significant [-10.22 (95% confidence interval (CI) -12.77 to -7.68)] on a scale from 0 to 100 in favor of BTX-A over sham. However, the difference was not clinically significant. Also, the meta-regression coefficient was insignificant [-0.01 (95% CI -0.04 to 0.02)]. The overall quality of evidence was moderate. In conclusion, there is moderate evidence that BTX-A injections are not more effective than saline injections to treat MFP in the neck and shoulder region. The effect of BTX-A did not exceed the level of clinical significance. So far, BTX-A cannot be recommended for clinical use when dealing with MFP in the neck and shoulder.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Rehabilitation Research is a quarterly, peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary forum for the publication of research into functioning, disability and contextual factors experienced by persons of all ages in both developed and developing societies. The wealth of information offered makes the journal a valuable resource for researchers, practitioners, and administrators in such fields as rehabilitation medicine, outcome measurement nursing, social and vocational rehabilitation/case management, return to work, special education, social policy, social work and social welfare, sociology, psychology, psychiatry assistive technology and environmental factors/disability. Areas of interest include functioning and disablement throughout the life cycle; rehabilitation programmes for persons with physical, sensory, mental and developmental disabilities; measurement of functioning and disability; special education and vocational rehabilitation; equipment access and transportation; information technology; independent living; consumer, legal, economic and sociopolitical aspects of functioning, disability and contextual factors.