计划外分流再入院:它到底是什么样子的?

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Emal Lesha, Kaan Yagmurlu, Nir Shimony, Brandy Vaughn, David G Laird, John E Dugan, Paul Klimo
{"title":"计划外分流再入院:它到底是什么样子的?","authors":"Emal Lesha, Kaan Yagmurlu, Nir Shimony, Brandy Vaughn, David G Laird, John E Dugan, Paul Klimo","doi":"10.3171/2024.12.PEDS24260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Readmission after an operation has garnered considerable attention within the neurosurgical literature. In this study, the authors sought to analyze the reasons why children are readmitted after shunt surgery and to identify key population characteristics and potential drivers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors' single-institution shunt surgery administrative database was used to identify procedures performed from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2021. Only de novo or revision cranial shunt operations were included. Each surgery within the database represents an index case, and each patient was followed for a 90-day period. The authors categorized an unplanned readmission after shunt surgery as falling into one of 4 groups: 1) definitely unrelated to the index surgery; 2) possibly related but ultimately deemed unrelated; 3) directly related but no return to the operating room; and 4) directly related and requiring repeat surgery. Groups 3 and 4 were combined for statistical purposes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 715 shunt operations were performed with 148 (20.7%) unplanned readmissions within 90 days in 139 patients. The median age was 3.2 years with 58%, 53%, and 58% being male, Caucasian, and having some form of public health insurance, respectively. The majority of African-American children had government insurance (80%) compared to Caucasian (41%) and Hispanic/other (55%) children (p < 0.001). The proportion of new versus revision surgical procedures was 45% versus 55%. Surgeon C did the most operations (n = 52 [37%]). The median number of days to readmission and length of readmission were 26.5 (IQR 9.5-47.0) days and 3.0 (IQR confidence interval 1.0-5.0) days, respectively. Multinomial analysis found that public insurance, revision surgery, and prior admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) were associated with definitely unrelated readmissions. Private insurance, no prior NICU admission, and an individual surgeon were associated with directly related readmissions. Survival analyses showed no differences in time to readmission among all patients and among only those who had prior NICU admission.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The 90-day readmission rate after index shunt surgery was 21%. Drivers of readmission-including socioeconomic status and hydrocephalus severity-were a function of the type of readmission.</p>","PeriodicalId":16549,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unplanned shunt readmission: what does it really look like?\",\"authors\":\"Emal Lesha, Kaan Yagmurlu, Nir Shimony, Brandy Vaughn, David G Laird, John E Dugan, Paul Klimo\",\"doi\":\"10.3171/2024.12.PEDS24260\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Readmission after an operation has garnered considerable attention within the neurosurgical literature. In this study, the authors sought to analyze the reasons why children are readmitted after shunt surgery and to identify key population characteristics and potential drivers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors' single-institution shunt surgery administrative database was used to identify procedures performed from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2021. Only de novo or revision cranial shunt operations were included. Each surgery within the database represents an index case, and each patient was followed for a 90-day period. The authors categorized an unplanned readmission after shunt surgery as falling into one of 4 groups: 1) definitely unrelated to the index surgery; 2) possibly related but ultimately deemed unrelated; 3) directly related but no return to the operating room; and 4) directly related and requiring repeat surgery. Groups 3 and 4 were combined for statistical purposes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 715 shunt operations were performed with 148 (20.7%) unplanned readmissions within 90 days in 139 patients. The median age was 3.2 years with 58%, 53%, and 58% being male, Caucasian, and having some form of public health insurance, respectively. The majority of African-American children had government insurance (80%) compared to Caucasian (41%) and Hispanic/other (55%) children (p < 0.001). The proportion of new versus revision surgical procedures was 45% versus 55%. Surgeon C did the most operations (n = 52 [37%]). The median number of days to readmission and length of readmission were 26.5 (IQR 9.5-47.0) days and 3.0 (IQR confidence interval 1.0-5.0) days, respectively. Multinomial analysis found that public insurance, revision surgery, and prior admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) were associated with definitely unrelated readmissions. Private insurance, no prior NICU admission, and an individual surgeon were associated with directly related readmissions. Survival analyses showed no differences in time to readmission among all patients and among only those who had prior NICU admission.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The 90-day readmission rate after index shunt surgery was 21%. Drivers of readmission-including socioeconomic status and hydrocephalus severity-were a function of the type of readmission.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.12.PEDS24260\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.12.PEDS24260","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:手术后再入院在神经外科文献中引起了相当大的关注。在这项研究中,作者试图分析儿童在分流手术后再次入院的原因,并确定关键人群特征和潜在的驱动因素。方法:使用作者的单机构分流手术管理数据库来识别2018年1月1日至2021年12月31日进行的手术。仅包括从头或翻修颅分流手术。数据库中的每个手术代表一个索引病例,每个患者被随访90天。作者将分流手术后的意外再入院分为4组:1)与指数手术完全无关;2)可能相关但最终被认为无关的;3)直接相关但不返回手术室的;4)直接相关且需要重复手术。将第3组和第4组合并进行统计。结果:139例患者共行分流术715例,90天内意外再入院148例(20.7%)。中位年龄为3.2岁,分别为58%、53%和58%的男性、白种人和拥有某种形式的公共医疗保险。大多数非裔美国儿童有政府保险(80%),而白人(41%)和西班牙裔/其他(55%)儿童有政府保险(p < 0.001)。新手术和翻修手术的比例分别为45%和55%。C外科手术最多(n = 52例[37%])。再入院天数和再入院时间的中位数分别为26.5 (IQR 9.5 ~ 47.0)天和3.0 (IQR置信区间1.0 ~ 5.0)天。多项分析发现,公共保险、翻修手术和先前入住新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)与绝对无关的再入院相关。私人保险,无新生儿重症监护室住院史,以及与再入院直接相关的单独外科医生。生存分析显示,所有患者再入院的时间没有差异,只有那些先前有NICU入院的患者。结论:指数分流术后90天再入院率为21%。再入院的驱动因素——包括社会经济地位和脑积水严重程度——是再入院类型的函数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unplanned shunt readmission: what does it really look like?

Objective: Readmission after an operation has garnered considerable attention within the neurosurgical literature. In this study, the authors sought to analyze the reasons why children are readmitted after shunt surgery and to identify key population characteristics and potential drivers.

Methods: The authors' single-institution shunt surgery administrative database was used to identify procedures performed from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2021. Only de novo or revision cranial shunt operations were included. Each surgery within the database represents an index case, and each patient was followed for a 90-day period. The authors categorized an unplanned readmission after shunt surgery as falling into one of 4 groups: 1) definitely unrelated to the index surgery; 2) possibly related but ultimately deemed unrelated; 3) directly related but no return to the operating room; and 4) directly related and requiring repeat surgery. Groups 3 and 4 were combined for statistical purposes.

Results: A total of 715 shunt operations were performed with 148 (20.7%) unplanned readmissions within 90 days in 139 patients. The median age was 3.2 years with 58%, 53%, and 58% being male, Caucasian, and having some form of public health insurance, respectively. The majority of African-American children had government insurance (80%) compared to Caucasian (41%) and Hispanic/other (55%) children (p < 0.001). The proportion of new versus revision surgical procedures was 45% versus 55%. Surgeon C did the most operations (n = 52 [37%]). The median number of days to readmission and length of readmission were 26.5 (IQR 9.5-47.0) days and 3.0 (IQR confidence interval 1.0-5.0) days, respectively. Multinomial analysis found that public insurance, revision surgery, and prior admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) were associated with definitely unrelated readmissions. Private insurance, no prior NICU admission, and an individual surgeon were associated with directly related readmissions. Survival analyses showed no differences in time to readmission among all patients and among only those who had prior NICU admission.

Conclusions: The 90-day readmission rate after index shunt surgery was 21%. Drivers of readmission-including socioeconomic status and hydrocephalus severity-were a function of the type of readmission.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics
Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.50%
发文量
307
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Information not localiced
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信