{"title":"脑健康测试-7、迷你精神状态检查和蒙特利尔认知评估对轻度认知障碍受试者的检测效果","authors":"Yi-Ting Lin, Pei-Ning Wang, Jiahn-Jyh Chen, Cheng-Sheng Chen, Chih-Cheng Hsu, Tzung-Jeng Hwang","doi":"10.1016/j.inpsyc.2025.100077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The Brain Health Test-7 (BHT-7), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) are valid dementia and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) screening tools. Relevant validation studies have usually used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis or a fixed-threshold approach. In this study, we adopted stratum-specific likelihood ratio (SSLR) analysis to capture more information about their performance in detecting MCI.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional multi-site study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Hospitals in northern and southern Taiwan.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>1090 subjects aged 50 years or older were assigned to a cognitively normal group, an MCI group, or a dementia group.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>BHT-7, MMSE, and MoCA to differentiate cognitively normal subjects from those with MCI or dementia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The three cognitive assessment tools were valid for detecting subjects with MCI or dementia according to ROC analysis. The overall area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the BHT-7 was significantly higher than that of the MoCA and MMSE in differentiating MCI or dementia from controls. Five strata were generated by SSLR analysis for the BHT-7 and MoCA, while 4 for the MMSE. The five strata of the BHT-7 and MoCA well represented the different degrees of probabilities of having MCI. However, it was still difficult to rule out the presence of MCI even by a test score within the highest-score stratum of the MMSE.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The BHT-7 performed slightly better than MoCA and MMSE in detecting subjects with MCI. The strata generated from the SSLR analysis were more informative than single cutoff values.</p>","PeriodicalId":14368,"journal":{"name":"International psychogeriatrics","volume":" ","pages":"100077"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of the Brain Health Test-7, Mini-Mental State Examination, and Montreal Cognitive Assessment for detecting subjects with mild cognitive impairment.\",\"authors\":\"Yi-Ting Lin, Pei-Ning Wang, Jiahn-Jyh Chen, Cheng-Sheng Chen, Chih-Cheng Hsu, Tzung-Jeng Hwang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.inpsyc.2025.100077\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The Brain Health Test-7 (BHT-7), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) are valid dementia and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) screening tools. Relevant validation studies have usually used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis or a fixed-threshold approach. In this study, we adopted stratum-specific likelihood ratio (SSLR) analysis to capture more information about their performance in detecting MCI.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional multi-site study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Hospitals in northern and southern Taiwan.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>1090 subjects aged 50 years or older were assigned to a cognitively normal group, an MCI group, or a dementia group.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>BHT-7, MMSE, and MoCA to differentiate cognitively normal subjects from those with MCI or dementia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The three cognitive assessment tools were valid for detecting subjects with MCI or dementia according to ROC analysis. The overall area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the BHT-7 was significantly higher than that of the MoCA and MMSE in differentiating MCI or dementia from controls. Five strata were generated by SSLR analysis for the BHT-7 and MoCA, while 4 for the MMSE. The five strata of the BHT-7 and MoCA well represented the different degrees of probabilities of having MCI. However, it was still difficult to rule out the presence of MCI even by a test score within the highest-score stratum of the MMSE.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The BHT-7 performed slightly better than MoCA and MMSE in detecting subjects with MCI. The strata generated from the SSLR analysis were more informative than single cutoff values.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14368,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International psychogeriatrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"100077\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International psychogeriatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inpsyc.2025.100077\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International psychogeriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inpsyc.2025.100077","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Performance of the Brain Health Test-7, Mini-Mental State Examination, and Montreal Cognitive Assessment for detecting subjects with mild cognitive impairment.
Objectives: The Brain Health Test-7 (BHT-7), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) are valid dementia and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) screening tools. Relevant validation studies have usually used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis or a fixed-threshold approach. In this study, we adopted stratum-specific likelihood ratio (SSLR) analysis to capture more information about their performance in detecting MCI.
Design: Cross-sectional multi-site study.
Setting: Hospitals in northern and southern Taiwan.
Participants: 1090 subjects aged 50 years or older were assigned to a cognitively normal group, an MCI group, or a dementia group.
Measurements: BHT-7, MMSE, and MoCA to differentiate cognitively normal subjects from those with MCI or dementia.
Results: The three cognitive assessment tools were valid for detecting subjects with MCI or dementia according to ROC analysis. The overall area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the BHT-7 was significantly higher than that of the MoCA and MMSE in differentiating MCI or dementia from controls. Five strata were generated by SSLR analysis for the BHT-7 and MoCA, while 4 for the MMSE. The five strata of the BHT-7 and MoCA well represented the different degrees of probabilities of having MCI. However, it was still difficult to rule out the presence of MCI even by a test score within the highest-score stratum of the MMSE.
Conclusions: The BHT-7 performed slightly better than MoCA and MMSE in detecting subjects with MCI. The strata generated from the SSLR analysis were more informative than single cutoff values.
期刊介绍:
A highly respected, multidisciplinary journal, International Psychogeriatrics publishes high quality original research papers in the field of psychogeriatrics. The journal aims to be the leading peer reviewed journal dealing with all aspects of the mental health of older people throughout the world. Circulated to over 1,000 members of the International Psychogeriatric Association, International Psychogeriatrics also features important editorials, provocative debates, literature reviews, book reviews and letters to the editor.