收集自黎巴嫩南部的尿路致病性大肠杆菌菌株感染中抗菌素耐药率的评估。

IF 1.7 Q4 MICROBIOLOGY
Sajida Chreim, Seyed Masoud Hosseini, Abdallah Medlej, Mahdi Tarhini
{"title":"收集自黎巴嫩南部的尿路致病性大肠杆菌菌株感染中抗菌素耐药率的评估。","authors":"Sajida Chreim, Seyed Masoud Hosseini, Abdallah Medlej, Mahdi Tarhini","doi":"10.18502/ijm.v17i2.18386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Uropathogenic <i>Escherichia coli</i> (UPEC) is a leading cause of urinary tract infections, which are a significant public health concern worldwide. Antibiotic resistance among UPEC isolates is an increasing challenge, necessitating a better understanding of the resistance patterns and underlying genetic mechanisms. This study examined the prevalence of antibiotic resistance phenotypes and the detection of specific resistance genes among patients with UPEC infections in Sheikh Ragheb Harb University Hospital in south Lebanon.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Antimicrobial resistance phenotype of 104 urine samples was tested to determine the resistance percentages for various antibiotics including ampicillin, gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, tetracycline, bactrim, meropenem, and imipenem using disk diffusion test. Additionally, molecular analysis like polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed to detect the presence of <i>bla</i> <sub>SHV</sub>, <i>qnrA, tetA, dfrA1, aac3, bla</i> <sub>OXA</sub> and <i>bla</i> <sub>IMP</sub> resistance genes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The antimicrobial resistance testing revealed the following resistance percentages for various antibiotics: ampicillin (100%), gentamicin (15.38%), ciprofloxacin (34.61%), tetracycline (48.07%), bactrim (17.3%), meropenem (0.96%) and imipenem (0.96%). The analysis of resistance genes showed the presence of <i>bla</i> <sub>SHV</sub> (7.96%), <i>qnrA</i> (0.96%), <i>tetA</i> (20.19%), and <i>dfrA1</i> (0.96%) genes, while the <i>aac3, bla</i> <sub>OXA</sub>, and <i>bla</i> <sub>IMP</sub> genes were not detected.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The high rates of antibiotic resistance observed, particularly to ampicillin and tetracycline, highlight the need for more judicious antibiotic use and the development of alternative treatment strategies to combat UPEC infections. These results can inform antimicrobial stewardship programs and guide the selection of appropriate empiric therapy for urinary tract infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":14633,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Microbiology","volume":"17 2","pages":"261-267"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The evaluation of antimicrobial resistance rates in infections caused by uropathogenic <i>Escherichia coli</i> strains collected from the south of Lebanon.\",\"authors\":\"Sajida Chreim, Seyed Masoud Hosseini, Abdallah Medlej, Mahdi Tarhini\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/ijm.v17i2.18386\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Uropathogenic <i>Escherichia coli</i> (UPEC) is a leading cause of urinary tract infections, which are a significant public health concern worldwide. Antibiotic resistance among UPEC isolates is an increasing challenge, necessitating a better understanding of the resistance patterns and underlying genetic mechanisms. This study examined the prevalence of antibiotic resistance phenotypes and the detection of specific resistance genes among patients with UPEC infections in Sheikh Ragheb Harb University Hospital in south Lebanon.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Antimicrobial resistance phenotype of 104 urine samples was tested to determine the resistance percentages for various antibiotics including ampicillin, gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, tetracycline, bactrim, meropenem, and imipenem using disk diffusion test. Additionally, molecular analysis like polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed to detect the presence of <i>bla</i> <sub>SHV</sub>, <i>qnrA, tetA, dfrA1, aac3, bla</i> <sub>OXA</sub> and <i>bla</i> <sub>IMP</sub> resistance genes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The antimicrobial resistance testing revealed the following resistance percentages for various antibiotics: ampicillin (100%), gentamicin (15.38%), ciprofloxacin (34.61%), tetracycline (48.07%), bactrim (17.3%), meropenem (0.96%) and imipenem (0.96%). The analysis of resistance genes showed the presence of <i>bla</i> <sub>SHV</sub> (7.96%), <i>qnrA</i> (0.96%), <i>tetA</i> (20.19%), and <i>dfrA1</i> (0.96%) genes, while the <i>aac3, bla</i> <sub>OXA</sub>, and <i>bla</i> <sub>IMP</sub> genes were not detected.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The high rates of antibiotic resistance observed, particularly to ampicillin and tetracycline, highlight the need for more judicious antibiotic use and the development of alternative treatment strategies to combat UPEC infections. These results can inform antimicrobial stewardship programs and guide the selection of appropriate empiric therapy for urinary tract infections.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14633,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iranian Journal of Microbiology\",\"volume\":\"17 2\",\"pages\":\"261-267\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iranian Journal of Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/ijm.v17i2.18386\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/ijm.v17i2.18386","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:尿路致病性大肠杆菌(UPEC)是尿路感染的主要原因,是世界范围内一个重要的公共卫生问题。UPEC分离株之间的抗生素耐药性是一个日益严峻的挑战,需要更好地了解耐药模式和潜在的遗传机制。本研究调查了黎巴嫩南部Sheikh Ragheb Harb大学医院UPEC感染患者中抗生素耐药表型的流行情况和特异性耐药基因的检测。材料与方法:对104份尿样进行耐药表型检测,采用纸片扩散试验测定患者对氨苄西林、庆大霉素、环丙沙星、四环素、巴克汀、美罗培南、亚胺培南等多种抗生素的耐药百分率。此外,采用聚合酶链反应(PCR)等分子分析方法检测bla SHV、qnrA、tetA、dfrA1、aac3、bla OXA和bla IMP耐药基因的存在。结果:各抗菌药物耐药率分别为氨苄西林(100%)、庆大霉素(15.38%)、环丙沙星(34.61%)、四环素(48.07%)、巴克瑞姆(17.3%)、美罗培南(0.96%)、亚胺培南(0.96%)。耐药基因分析显示,bla SHV(7.96%)、qnrA(0.96%)、tetA(20.19%)和dfrA1(0.96%)基因存在,而aac3、bla OXA和bla IMP基因未检出。结论:观察到较高的抗生素耐药率,特别是氨苄西林和四环素,强调需要更明智地使用抗生素,并制定替代治疗策略来对抗UPEC感染。这些结果可以为抗菌药物管理规划提供信息,并指导选择适当的尿路感染经验性治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The evaluation of antimicrobial resistance rates in infections caused by uropathogenic Escherichia coli strains collected from the south of Lebanon.

Background and objectives: Uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) is a leading cause of urinary tract infections, which are a significant public health concern worldwide. Antibiotic resistance among UPEC isolates is an increasing challenge, necessitating a better understanding of the resistance patterns and underlying genetic mechanisms. This study examined the prevalence of antibiotic resistance phenotypes and the detection of specific resistance genes among patients with UPEC infections in Sheikh Ragheb Harb University Hospital in south Lebanon.

Materials and methods: Antimicrobial resistance phenotype of 104 urine samples was tested to determine the resistance percentages for various antibiotics including ampicillin, gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, tetracycline, bactrim, meropenem, and imipenem using disk diffusion test. Additionally, molecular analysis like polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed to detect the presence of bla SHV, qnrA, tetA, dfrA1, aac3, bla OXA and bla IMP resistance genes.

Results: The antimicrobial resistance testing revealed the following resistance percentages for various antibiotics: ampicillin (100%), gentamicin (15.38%), ciprofloxacin (34.61%), tetracycline (48.07%), bactrim (17.3%), meropenem (0.96%) and imipenem (0.96%). The analysis of resistance genes showed the presence of bla SHV (7.96%), qnrA (0.96%), tetA (20.19%), and dfrA1 (0.96%) genes, while the aac3, bla OXA, and bla IMP genes were not detected.

Conclusion: The high rates of antibiotic resistance observed, particularly to ampicillin and tetracycline, highlight the need for more judicious antibiotic use and the development of alternative treatment strategies to combat UPEC infections. These results can inform antimicrobial stewardship programs and guide the selection of appropriate empiric therapy for urinary tract infections.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
96
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Iranian Journal of Microbiology (IJM) is an international, multi-disciplinary, peer-reviewed journal that provides rapid publication of the most advanced scientific research in the areas of basic and applied research on bacteria and other micro-organisms, including bacteria, viruses, yeasts, fungi, microalgae, and protozoa concerning the development of tools for diagnosis and disease control, epidemiology, antimicrobial agents, clinical microbiology, immunology, Genetics, Genomics and Molecular Biology. Contributions may be in the form of original research papers, review articles, short communications, case reports, technical reports, and letters to the Editor. Research findings must be novel and the original data must be available for review by the Editors, if necessary. Studies that are preliminary, of weak originality or merely descriptive as well as negative results are not appropriate for the journal. Papers considered for publication must be unpublished work (except in an abstract form) that is not under consideration for publication anywhere else, and all co-authors should have agreed to the submission. Manuscripts should be written in English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信