Tom Citherlet, Antoine Raberin, Giorgio Manferdelli, Grégoire P Millet
{"title":"更年期对缺氧反应和急性高山病发病率的影响。","authors":"Tom Citherlet, Antoine Raberin, Giorgio Manferdelli, Grégoire P Millet","doi":"10.1007/s00421-025-05790-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Menopause results in decreased ovarian hormones, potentially impacting physiological responses to hypoxia and its tolerance. This study explored menopause's influence on physiological responses during rest and exercise in normobaric hypoxia and its role in predicting acute mountain sickness (AMS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirteen eumenorrheic women in their mid-luteal phase (EW, age = 32 ± 8 year) and fifteen postmenopausal women (PW, age = 63 ± 2 year) were examined on two occasions. Their ovarian hormonal levels were measured. In the first visit, hypoxic ventilatory response (HVR), physiological responses (ventilation, pulse oximetry, and heart rate) at rest and exercise in normobaric hypoxia (F<sub>i</sub>O<sub>2</sub> = 0.14) and anxiety levels were tested. On the second visit, cortisol awakening response and oxidative stress markers were measured at low altitude, with cortisol awakening response repeated during an overnight stay at high altitude (3375 m) along with evaluation for AMS using the Lake Louise Score, peripheral oxygen saturation and anxiety levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PW exhibited lower estradiol (16.9 ± 16.7 vs 4.6 ± 2.3 pg/ml, p < 0.01) and progesterone (13.39 ± 7.61 vs 0.06 ± 0.07 ng/ml, p < 0.001) levels than EW. Despite higher ventilation at rest in EW compared to PW in normoxia (10.0 ± 1.5 vs 8.5 ± 0.9 L/min; p < 0.01) and hypoxia (9.4 ± 1.3 vs 8.2 ± 1.3 L/min) , HVR (- 0.34 ± 0.13 vs - 0.27 ± 0.15 L/min/%) was similar between groups (p = 0.26). AMS incidence did not differ between EW (31%) and PW (40%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, EW had higher ventilation at rest in normoxia and normobaric hypoxia compared to PW, but similar responses and AMS incidence at high altitude. Age has minimal impact on HVR in women.</p>","PeriodicalId":12005,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Applied Physiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of menopause on responses to hypoxia and incidence of acute mountain sickness.\",\"authors\":\"Tom Citherlet, Antoine Raberin, Giorgio Manferdelli, Grégoire P Millet\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00421-025-05790-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Menopause results in decreased ovarian hormones, potentially impacting physiological responses to hypoxia and its tolerance. This study explored menopause's influence on physiological responses during rest and exercise in normobaric hypoxia and its role in predicting acute mountain sickness (AMS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirteen eumenorrheic women in their mid-luteal phase (EW, age = 32 ± 8 year) and fifteen postmenopausal women (PW, age = 63 ± 2 year) were examined on two occasions. Their ovarian hormonal levels were measured. In the first visit, hypoxic ventilatory response (HVR), physiological responses (ventilation, pulse oximetry, and heart rate) at rest and exercise in normobaric hypoxia (F<sub>i</sub>O<sub>2</sub> = 0.14) and anxiety levels were tested. On the second visit, cortisol awakening response and oxidative stress markers were measured at low altitude, with cortisol awakening response repeated during an overnight stay at high altitude (3375 m) along with evaluation for AMS using the Lake Louise Score, peripheral oxygen saturation and anxiety levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PW exhibited lower estradiol (16.9 ± 16.7 vs 4.6 ± 2.3 pg/ml, p < 0.01) and progesterone (13.39 ± 7.61 vs 0.06 ± 0.07 ng/ml, p < 0.001) levels than EW. Despite higher ventilation at rest in EW compared to PW in normoxia (10.0 ± 1.5 vs 8.5 ± 0.9 L/min; p < 0.01) and hypoxia (9.4 ± 1.3 vs 8.2 ± 1.3 L/min) , HVR (- 0.34 ± 0.13 vs - 0.27 ± 0.15 L/min/%) was similar between groups (p = 0.26). AMS incidence did not differ between EW (31%) and PW (40%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, EW had higher ventilation at rest in normoxia and normobaric hypoxia compared to PW, but similar responses and AMS incidence at high altitude. Age has minimal impact on HVR in women.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12005,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Applied Physiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Applied Physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-025-05790-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Applied Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-025-05790-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:更年期导致卵巢激素下降,可能影响对缺氧的生理反应及其耐受性。本研究旨在探讨更年期对常压缺氧条件下休息和运动时生理反应的影响及其在急性高原病(AMS)预测中的作用。方法:对13例黄体中期绝经妇女(EW,年龄32±8岁)和15例绝经后妇女(PW,年龄63±2岁)进行两次检查。他们的卵巢激素水平被测量。首次访视时,检测患者静息和常压低氧运动时的低氧通气反应(HVR)、生理反应(通气、脉搏血氧仪和心率)(FiO2 = 0.14)和焦虑水平。在第二次访问中,在低海拔测量皮质醇唤醒反应和氧化应激标志物,在高海拔(3375 m)过夜期间重复皮质醇唤醒反应,并使用路易斯湖评分、外周氧饱和度和焦虑水平评估AMS。结果:PW表现出较低的雌二醇水平(16.9±16.7 vs 4.6±2.3 pg/ml, p)。结论:与PW相比,在常氧和常压缺氧条件下,EW具有较高的静息通气,但在高海拔地区的反应和AMS发生率相似。年龄对女性HVR的影响最小。
Impact of menopause on responses to hypoxia and incidence of acute mountain sickness.
Purpose: Menopause results in decreased ovarian hormones, potentially impacting physiological responses to hypoxia and its tolerance. This study explored menopause's influence on physiological responses during rest and exercise in normobaric hypoxia and its role in predicting acute mountain sickness (AMS).
Methods: Thirteen eumenorrheic women in their mid-luteal phase (EW, age = 32 ± 8 year) and fifteen postmenopausal women (PW, age = 63 ± 2 year) were examined on two occasions. Their ovarian hormonal levels were measured. In the first visit, hypoxic ventilatory response (HVR), physiological responses (ventilation, pulse oximetry, and heart rate) at rest and exercise in normobaric hypoxia (FiO2 = 0.14) and anxiety levels were tested. On the second visit, cortisol awakening response and oxidative stress markers were measured at low altitude, with cortisol awakening response repeated during an overnight stay at high altitude (3375 m) along with evaluation for AMS using the Lake Louise Score, peripheral oxygen saturation and anxiety levels.
Results: PW exhibited lower estradiol (16.9 ± 16.7 vs 4.6 ± 2.3 pg/ml, p < 0.01) and progesterone (13.39 ± 7.61 vs 0.06 ± 0.07 ng/ml, p < 0.001) levels than EW. Despite higher ventilation at rest in EW compared to PW in normoxia (10.0 ± 1.5 vs 8.5 ± 0.9 L/min; p < 0.01) and hypoxia (9.4 ± 1.3 vs 8.2 ± 1.3 L/min) , HVR (- 0.34 ± 0.13 vs - 0.27 ± 0.15 L/min/%) was similar between groups (p = 0.26). AMS incidence did not differ between EW (31%) and PW (40%).
Conclusion: In conclusion, EW had higher ventilation at rest in normoxia and normobaric hypoxia compared to PW, but similar responses and AMS incidence at high altitude. Age has minimal impact on HVR in women.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Applied Physiology (EJAP) aims to promote mechanistic advances in human integrative and translational physiology. Physiology is viewed broadly, having overlapping context with related disciplines such as biomechanics, biochemistry, endocrinology, ergonomics, immunology, motor control, and nutrition. EJAP welcomes studies dealing with physical exercise, training and performance. Studies addressing physiological mechanisms are preferred over descriptive studies. Papers dealing with animal models or pathophysiological conditions are not excluded from consideration, but must be clearly relevant to human physiology.