洁净尿动力学系统的可行性和安全性:现代尿动力学系统功效研究。

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Journal of endourology Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-02 DOI:10.1089/end.2025.0270
Jason Kim, Keith Xavier, Tracy Cannon-Smith, Taylor Vaughan, Sreenivas Vemulapalli, Hanson Zhao, Arshia Aalami-Harandi, Nemi Shah
{"title":"洁净尿动力学系统的可行性和安全性:现代尿动力学系统功效研究。","authors":"Jason Kim, Keith Xavier, Tracy Cannon-Smith, Taylor Vaughan, Sreenivas Vemulapalli, Hanson Zhao, Arshia Aalami-Harandi, Nemi Shah","doi":"10.1089/end.2025.0270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> Urodynamics is used to diagnose lower urinary tract dysfunction; however, conventional urodynamics results often poorly correlate to patient symptoms because of the nonphysiological nature of the test. The Glean<sup>TM</sup> Urodynamics System is a novel, wireless, catheter-free ambulatory urodynamics system that allows clinicians to study lower urinary tract dysfunction in a more physiological manner. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of the Glean Urodynamics System for use in clinic. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> This prospective, single-arm, multicenter interventional trial enrolled adults with lower urinary tract dysfunction. Participants underwent conventional urodynamics per standard of care followed by ambulatory urodynamics using the intravesical Glean bladder sensor. After the removal of the Glean sensor, participants completed comfort and preference questionnaires. Participants were followed up within 7-14 days to assess the incidence of adverse events. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Thirty-eight participants were enrolled. Glean sensor insertion was attempted in 33 participants and successful in 32 (97.0%). The median sensor insertion time was 33.62 seconds (range: 12.32-256). The Glean Urodynamics System recorded vesical pressure, and all 32 participants were able to void with the sensor indwelling. Median sensor removal time was 5.71 seconds (range: 0.79-22.15). There were 14 adverse events in 12 participants, of which 7 events (in 7 participants) were attributed to the Glean Urodynamics System. There were no serious adverse events. Overall participant feedback on the Glean Urodynamics System was positive, and clinicians reported it was easy to use. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The Glean Urodynamics System is a feasible, efficacious, safe, and well-tolerated device that enables ambulatory urodynamics with physiological bladder filling and without catheters impeding lower urinary tract function.</p>","PeriodicalId":15723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endourology","volume":" ","pages":"625-634"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Feasibility and Safety of the Glean Urodynamics System: The Modern Urodynamics System Efficacy Study.\",\"authors\":\"Jason Kim, Keith Xavier, Tracy Cannon-Smith, Taylor Vaughan, Sreenivas Vemulapalli, Hanson Zhao, Arshia Aalami-Harandi, Nemi Shah\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/end.2025.0270\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> Urodynamics is used to diagnose lower urinary tract dysfunction; however, conventional urodynamics results often poorly correlate to patient symptoms because of the nonphysiological nature of the test. The Glean<sup>TM</sup> Urodynamics System is a novel, wireless, catheter-free ambulatory urodynamics system that allows clinicians to study lower urinary tract dysfunction in a more physiological manner. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of the Glean Urodynamics System for use in clinic. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> This prospective, single-arm, multicenter interventional trial enrolled adults with lower urinary tract dysfunction. Participants underwent conventional urodynamics per standard of care followed by ambulatory urodynamics using the intravesical Glean bladder sensor. After the removal of the Glean sensor, participants completed comfort and preference questionnaires. Participants were followed up within 7-14 days to assess the incidence of adverse events. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Thirty-eight participants were enrolled. Glean sensor insertion was attempted in 33 participants and successful in 32 (97.0%). The median sensor insertion time was 33.62 seconds (range: 12.32-256). The Glean Urodynamics System recorded vesical pressure, and all 32 participants were able to void with the sensor indwelling. Median sensor removal time was 5.71 seconds (range: 0.79-22.15). There were 14 adverse events in 12 participants, of which 7 events (in 7 participants) were attributed to the Glean Urodynamics System. There were no serious adverse events. Overall participant feedback on the Glean Urodynamics System was positive, and clinicians reported it was easy to use. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The Glean Urodynamics System is a feasible, efficacious, safe, and well-tolerated device that enables ambulatory urodynamics with physiological bladder filling and without catheters impeding lower urinary tract function.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of endourology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"625-634\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of endourology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2025.0270\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endourology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2025.0270","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:应用尿动力学诊断下尿路功能障碍;然而,由于常规尿动力学检查的非生理性质,其结果往往与患者症状相关性较差。GleanTM尿动力学系统是一种新颖的、无线的、无导尿管的动态尿动力学系统,它允许临床医生以更生理的方式研究下尿路功能障碍。本研究的目的是评估Glean尿动力学系统在临床应用的可行性、有效性和安全性。材料和方法:这项前瞻性、单臂、多中心介入试验招募了患有下尿路功能障碍的成年人。参与者按照标准护理进行常规尿动力学检查,随后使用膀胱内清洁膀胱传感器进行动态尿动力学检查。在移除收集传感器后,参与者完成舒适度和偏好问卷。参与者在7-14天内随访,以评估不良事件的发生率。结果:38名受试者入组。33名参与者尝试插入收集传感器,32名成功(97.0%)。传感器插入时间中位数为33.62秒(范围:12.32-256)。收集尿动力学系统记录膀胱压力,所有32名参与者都可以通过传感器留置排空。传感器去除时间中位数为5.71秒(范围:0.79-22.15)。12名参与者中有14个不良事件,其中7个事件(7名参与者)归因于lean尿动力学系统。无严重不良事件发生。参与者对lean尿动力学系统的总体反馈是积极的,临床医生报告该系统易于使用。结论:Glean尿动力学系统是一种可行、有效、安全且耐受性良好的装置,可实现生理膀胱填充的动态尿动力学,且无需导尿管阻碍下尿路功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Feasibility and Safety of the Glean Urodynamics System: The Modern Urodynamics System Efficacy Study.

Purpose: Urodynamics is used to diagnose lower urinary tract dysfunction; however, conventional urodynamics results often poorly correlate to patient symptoms because of the nonphysiological nature of the test. The GleanTM Urodynamics System is a novel, wireless, catheter-free ambulatory urodynamics system that allows clinicians to study lower urinary tract dysfunction in a more physiological manner. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of the Glean Urodynamics System for use in clinic. Materials and Methods: This prospective, single-arm, multicenter interventional trial enrolled adults with lower urinary tract dysfunction. Participants underwent conventional urodynamics per standard of care followed by ambulatory urodynamics using the intravesical Glean bladder sensor. After the removal of the Glean sensor, participants completed comfort and preference questionnaires. Participants were followed up within 7-14 days to assess the incidence of adverse events. Results: Thirty-eight participants were enrolled. Glean sensor insertion was attempted in 33 participants and successful in 32 (97.0%). The median sensor insertion time was 33.62 seconds (range: 12.32-256). The Glean Urodynamics System recorded vesical pressure, and all 32 participants were able to void with the sensor indwelling. Median sensor removal time was 5.71 seconds (range: 0.79-22.15). There were 14 adverse events in 12 participants, of which 7 events (in 7 participants) were attributed to the Glean Urodynamics System. There were no serious adverse events. Overall participant feedback on the Glean Urodynamics System was positive, and clinicians reported it was easy to use. Conclusions: The Glean Urodynamics System is a feasible, efficacious, safe, and well-tolerated device that enables ambulatory urodynamics with physiological bladder filling and without catheters impeding lower urinary tract function.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of endourology
Journal of endourology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
14.80%
发文量
254
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Endourology, JE Case Reports, and Videourology are the leading peer-reviewed journal, case reports publication, and innovative videojournal companion covering all aspects of minimally invasive urology research, applications, and clinical outcomes. The leading journal of minimally invasive urology for over 30 years, Journal of Endourology is the essential publication for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest surgical technologies in endoscopic, laparoscopic, robotic, and image-guided procedures as they apply to benign and malignant diseases of the genitourinary tract. This flagship journal includes the companion videojournal Videourology™ with every subscription. While Journal of Endourology remains focused on publishing rigorously peer reviewed articles, Videourology accepts original videos containing material that has not been reported elsewhere, except in the form of an abstract or a conference presentation. Journal of Endourology coverage includes: The latest laparoscopic, robotic, endoscopic, and image-guided techniques for treating both benign and malignant conditions Pioneering research articles Controversial cases in endourology Techniques in endourology with accompanying videos Reviews and epochs in endourology Endourology survey section of endourology relevant manuscripts published in other journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信