搅拌系统中球形衍生小胞外囊泡产生的可扩展性。

IF 4.3 3区 工程技术 Q1 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology Pub Date : 2025-04-29 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fbioe.2025.1516482
Thibaud Dauphin, Laurence de Beaurepaire, Apolline Salama, Quentin Pruvost, Clémentine Claire, Karine Haurogné, Sophie Sourice, Aurélien Dupont, Jean-Marie Bach, Julie Hervé, Eric Olmos, Steffi Bosch, Blandine Lieubeau, Mathilde Mosser
{"title":"搅拌系统中球形衍生小胞外囊泡产生的可扩展性。","authors":"Thibaud Dauphin, Laurence de Beaurepaire, Apolline Salama, Quentin Pruvost, Clémentine Claire, Karine Haurogné, Sophie Sourice, Aurélien Dupont, Jean-Marie Bach, Julie Hervé, Eric Olmos, Steffi Bosch, Blandine Lieubeau, Mathilde Mosser","doi":"10.3389/fbioe.2025.1516482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Small extracellular vesicle (sEV)-based therapies have gained widespread interest, but challenges persist to ensure standardization and high-scale production. Implementing upstream processes in a chemically defined media in stirred-tank bioreactors (STBr) is mandatory to closely control the cell environment, and to scale-up production, but it remains a significant challenge for anchorage-dependent cells.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a human β cell line, grown as monolayer or in suspension as spheroid in stirred systems. We assessed the consequences of culturing these cells in 3D with, or without fetal bovine serum in a chemically defined medium, for cell growth, viability and metabolism. We next explored how different scale-up strategies might influence cell and spheroid formation in spinner flask, with the aim to transfer the process in instrumented Ambr®250 STBr. Lastly, we analyzed and characterized sEV production in monolayer, spinner flask and STBr.</p><p><strong>Results and discussion: </strong>Generation of spheroids in a chemically defined medium allowed the culture of highly viable cells in suspension in stirred systems. Spheroid size depended on the system's volumetric power input (P/V), and maintaining this parameter constant during scale-up proved to be the optimal strategy for standardizing the process. However, transferring the spinner flask (SpF) process to the Ambr®250 STBr at constant P/V modified spheroid size, due to important geometric differences and impeller design. Compared to a monolayer reference process, sEV yield decreased two-fold in SpF, but increased two-fold in STBr. Additionally, a lower expression of the CD63 tetraspanin was observed in sEV produced in both stirred systems, suggesting a reduced release of exosomes compared to ectosomes. This study addresses the main issues encountered in spheroid culture scale-up in stirred systems, rather conducive for the production of ectosomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12444,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology","volume":"13 ","pages":"1516482"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12069995/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scalability of spheroid-derived small extracellular vesicles production in stirred systems.\",\"authors\":\"Thibaud Dauphin, Laurence de Beaurepaire, Apolline Salama, Quentin Pruvost, Clémentine Claire, Karine Haurogné, Sophie Sourice, Aurélien Dupont, Jean-Marie Bach, Julie Hervé, Eric Olmos, Steffi Bosch, Blandine Lieubeau, Mathilde Mosser\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fbioe.2025.1516482\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Small extracellular vesicle (sEV)-based therapies have gained widespread interest, but challenges persist to ensure standardization and high-scale production. Implementing upstream processes in a chemically defined media in stirred-tank bioreactors (STBr) is mandatory to closely control the cell environment, and to scale-up production, but it remains a significant challenge for anchorage-dependent cells.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a human β cell line, grown as monolayer or in suspension as spheroid in stirred systems. We assessed the consequences of culturing these cells in 3D with, or without fetal bovine serum in a chemically defined medium, for cell growth, viability and metabolism. We next explored how different scale-up strategies might influence cell and spheroid formation in spinner flask, with the aim to transfer the process in instrumented Ambr®250 STBr. Lastly, we analyzed and characterized sEV production in monolayer, spinner flask and STBr.</p><p><strong>Results and discussion: </strong>Generation of spheroids in a chemically defined medium allowed the culture of highly viable cells in suspension in stirred systems. Spheroid size depended on the system's volumetric power input (P/V), and maintaining this parameter constant during scale-up proved to be the optimal strategy for standardizing the process. However, transferring the spinner flask (SpF) process to the Ambr®250 STBr at constant P/V modified spheroid size, due to important geometric differences and impeller design. Compared to a monolayer reference process, sEV yield decreased two-fold in SpF, but increased two-fold in STBr. Additionally, a lower expression of the CD63 tetraspanin was observed in sEV produced in both stirred systems, suggesting a reduced release of exosomes compared to ectosomes. This study addresses the main issues encountered in spheroid culture scale-up in stirred systems, rather conducive for the production of ectosomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"1516482\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12069995/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2025.1516482\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2025.1516482","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于小细胞外囊泡(sEV)的治疗方法已经引起了广泛的兴趣,但在确保标准化和大规模生产方面仍然存在挑战。在搅拌槽生物反应器(STBr)的化学定义介质中实施上游工艺是严格控制细胞环境和扩大生产的必要条件,但对于依赖锚定的细胞来说,这仍然是一个重大挑战。方法:采用人β细胞系,在搅拌系统中培养为单层或悬浮球形细胞。我们评估了在化学定义的培养基中,用或不含胎牛血清在3D环境中培养这些细胞对细胞生长、活力和代谢的影响。接下来,我们探索了不同的放大策略如何影响旋转烧瓶中细胞和球体的形成,目的是在仪器化的Ambr®250 STBr中转移这一过程。最后,我们分析和表征了在单层、旋转烧瓶和STBr上制备sEV的方法。结果和讨论:在化学定义的培养基中产生球体,可以在搅拌系统中培养悬浮的高活细胞。球体尺寸取决于系统的体积功率输入(P/V),在放大过程中保持该参数不变被证明是标准化过程的最佳策略。然而,由于重要的几何差异和叶轮设计,在恒定P/V下将旋转烧瓶(SpF)过程转移到Ambr®250 STBr中会改变球体尺寸。与单层对照工艺相比,sEV产率在SpF条件下降低了2倍,而在STBr条件下提高了2倍。此外,在两种搅拌系统中产生的sEV中观察到CD63四跨蛋白的表达较低,这表明与外泌体相比,外泌体的释放减少。本研究解决了在搅拌系统中球形培养放大时遇到的主要问题,这有利于外泌体的产生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Scalability of spheroid-derived small extracellular vesicles production in stirred systems.

Introduction: Small extracellular vesicle (sEV)-based therapies have gained widespread interest, but challenges persist to ensure standardization and high-scale production. Implementing upstream processes in a chemically defined media in stirred-tank bioreactors (STBr) is mandatory to closely control the cell environment, and to scale-up production, but it remains a significant challenge for anchorage-dependent cells.

Methods: We used a human β cell line, grown as monolayer or in suspension as spheroid in stirred systems. We assessed the consequences of culturing these cells in 3D with, or without fetal bovine serum in a chemically defined medium, for cell growth, viability and metabolism. We next explored how different scale-up strategies might influence cell and spheroid formation in spinner flask, with the aim to transfer the process in instrumented Ambr®250 STBr. Lastly, we analyzed and characterized sEV production in monolayer, spinner flask and STBr.

Results and discussion: Generation of spheroids in a chemically defined medium allowed the culture of highly viable cells in suspension in stirred systems. Spheroid size depended on the system's volumetric power input (P/V), and maintaining this parameter constant during scale-up proved to be the optimal strategy for standardizing the process. However, transferring the spinner flask (SpF) process to the Ambr®250 STBr at constant P/V modified spheroid size, due to important geometric differences and impeller design. Compared to a monolayer reference process, sEV yield decreased two-fold in SpF, but increased two-fold in STBr. Additionally, a lower expression of the CD63 tetraspanin was observed in sEV produced in both stirred systems, suggesting a reduced release of exosomes compared to ectosomes. This study addresses the main issues encountered in spheroid culture scale-up in stirred systems, rather conducive for the production of ectosomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology Chemical Engineering-Bioengineering
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
2270
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The translation of new discoveries in medicine to clinical routine has never been easy. During the second half of the last century, thanks to the progress in chemistry, biochemistry and pharmacology, we have seen the development and the application of a large number of drugs and devices aimed at the treatment of symptoms, blocking unwanted pathways and, in the case of infectious diseases, fighting the micro-organisms responsible. However, we are facing, today, a dramatic change in the therapeutic approach to pathologies and diseases. Indeed, the challenge of the present and the next decade is to fully restore the physiological status of the diseased organism and to completely regenerate tissue and organs when they are so seriously affected that treatments cannot be limited to the repression of symptoms or to the repair of damage. This is being made possible thanks to the major developments made in basic cell and molecular biology, including stem cell science, growth factor delivery, gene isolation and transfection, the advances in bioengineering and nanotechnology, including development of new biomaterials, biofabrication technologies and use of bioreactors, and the big improvements in diagnostic tools and imaging of cells, tissues and organs. In today`s world, an enhancement of communication between multidisciplinary experts, together with the promotion of joint projects and close collaborations among scientists, engineers, industry people, regulatory agencies and physicians are absolute requirements for the success of any attempt to develop and clinically apply a new biological therapy or an innovative device involving the collective use of biomaterials, cells and/or bioactive molecules. “Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology” aspires to be a forum for all people involved in the process by bridging the gap too often existing between a discovery in the basic sciences and its clinical application.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信