Nathan Hm Friedman, Sophie Hallot, Inbal Itzhak, Richard Camicioli, Alex Henri-Bhargava, Jacqueline A Pettersen, Linda Lee, John D Fisk, Paula McLaughlin, Vladimir Khanassov, Zahinoor Ismail, Morris Freedman, Howard Chertkow, Philippe Desmarais, Megan E O'Connell, Maiya R Geddes
{"title":"远程认知诊断评估的危险信号：一项德尔菲专家共识研究，由加拿大老年神经退行性变协会完成。","authors":"Nathan Hm Friedman, Sophie Hallot, Inbal Itzhak, Richard Camicioli, Alex Henri-Bhargava, Jacqueline A Pettersen, Linda Lee, John D Fisk, Paula McLaughlin, Vladimir Khanassov, Zahinoor Ismail, Morris Freedman, Howard Chertkow, Philippe Desmarais, Megan E O'Connell, Maiya R Geddes","doi":"10.1177/13872877251338186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite the potential benefits of remote cognitive assessment for dementia, it is not appropriate for all clinical encounters. Our aim was to develop guidance on determining a patient's suitability for comprehensive remote cognitive diagnostic assessment for dementia. A multidisciplinary expert workgroup was convened under the auspices of the Canadian Consortium on Neurodegeneration in Aging. We applied the Delphi method to determine 'red flags' for remote cognitive assessment of dementia. This resulted in 14 red flags that met the predetermined consensus criteria. We then developed a novel clinical decision-making infographic that integrated these findings to support multidisciplinary clinicians in determining a patient's readiness to undergo comprehensive remote cognitive assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":14929,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":" ","pages":"13872877251338186"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Red flags for remote cognitive diagnostic assessment: A Delphi expert consensus study by the Canadian Consortium on Neurodegeneration in Aging.\",\"authors\":\"Nathan Hm Friedman, Sophie Hallot, Inbal Itzhak, Richard Camicioli, Alex Henri-Bhargava, Jacqueline A Pettersen, Linda Lee, John D Fisk, Paula McLaughlin, Vladimir Khanassov, Zahinoor Ismail, Morris Freedman, Howard Chertkow, Philippe Desmarais, Megan E O'Connell, Maiya R Geddes\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13872877251338186\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Despite the potential benefits of remote cognitive assessment for dementia, it is not appropriate for all clinical encounters. Our aim was to develop guidance on determining a patient's suitability for comprehensive remote cognitive diagnostic assessment for dementia. A multidisciplinary expert workgroup was convened under the auspices of the Canadian Consortium on Neurodegeneration in Aging. We applied the Delphi method to determine 'red flags' for remote cognitive assessment of dementia. This resulted in 14 red flags that met the predetermined consensus criteria. We then developed a novel clinical decision-making infographic that integrated these findings to support multidisciplinary clinicians in determining a patient's readiness to undergo comprehensive remote cognitive assessment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"13872877251338186\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877251338186\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877251338186","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Red flags for remote cognitive diagnostic assessment: A Delphi expert consensus study by the Canadian Consortium on Neurodegeneration in Aging.
Despite the potential benefits of remote cognitive assessment for dementia, it is not appropriate for all clinical encounters. Our aim was to develop guidance on determining a patient's suitability for comprehensive remote cognitive diagnostic assessment for dementia. A multidisciplinary expert workgroup was convened under the auspices of the Canadian Consortium on Neurodegeneration in Aging. We applied the Delphi method to determine 'red flags' for remote cognitive assessment of dementia. This resulted in 14 red flags that met the predetermined consensus criteria. We then developed a novel clinical decision-making infographic that integrated these findings to support multidisciplinary clinicians in determining a patient's readiness to undergo comprehensive remote cognitive assessment.
期刊介绍：
The Journal of Alzheimer''s Disease (JAD) is an international multidisciplinary journal to facilitate progress in understanding the etiology, pathogenesis, epidemiology, genetics, behavior, treatment and psychology of Alzheimer''s disease. The journal publishes research reports, reviews, short communications, hypotheses, ethics reviews, book reviews, and letters-to-the-editor. The journal is dedicated to providing an open forum for original research that will expedite our fundamental understanding of Alzheimer''s disease.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
