Madeleine J Bryant, Susan Lester, Oscar Russell, Samuel Whittle, Vidya Limaye, Susanna Proudman, Rachel J Black, Catherine L Hill
{"title":"实施一种新的风湿病患者报告经验测量（PREM）：澳大利亚风湿病门诊患者的横断面在线调查。","authors":"Madeleine J Bryant, Susan Lester, Oscar Russell, Samuel Whittle, Vidya Limaye, Susanna Proudman, Rachel J Black, Catherine L Hill","doi":"10.1007/s00296-025-05882-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To determine rheumatology patient care experience using the novel Commissioning for Quality in Rheumatoid Arthritis-PREM-Australian version (CQRA-PREM-AU). Patients attending Central Adelaide Local Health Network rheumatology outpatient clinics were invited to complete a cross-sectional web-based survey, comprising CQRA-PREM-AU (22 items, 8 domains, scored 1-5), demographics, Patient Global Assessment (PGA) and Patient Reported Disease Activity (PRDA) Visual Analogue Scales (VAS) (scored 0-100), Single Item Literacy Screener (SILS). Analysed were multivariable linear regression analysis of CQRA-PREM-AU overall score with patient-related covariates (diagnosis, age, sex, SILS, PGA, PRDA), and univariate regression analysis with clinic-related covariates (site, nurse contact, type/number of consultations). Response rate was 1408/4591(31%). 214 incomplete records were excluded; 1194 records were analysed. Respondent characteristics: 68% female, median age 64 years (IQR 54, 73), 29% rural, 7% non-English language at home. PGA median score 50 (IQR 27, 63) and PRDA median score 50 (IQR 26, 69). CQRA-PREM-AU Domain 1 (regarding patient Needs and Preferences) had the best overall mean score (4.1, SD 0.86). Scored poorly were Domain 3 (Information about care, 3.5, SD 0.89), Domain 4 (Daily living, 3.5, SD 1.06) and Domain 5 (Emotional care, 3.6, SD 1.04). Worse PGA, and diagnoses of systemic lupus erythematosus, \"other\", or \"unknown\" were all associated with significantly lower CQRA-PREM-AU score (p < 0.01). Older age, and rheumatology nurse contact were associated with better experience score (p < 0.01). Use of CQRA-PREM-AU highlights the association between contact with a rheumatology nurse and better care experience, and identifies other targets for improving healthcare delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":21322,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology International","volume":"45 6","pages":"138"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12062103/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation of a novel patient reported experience measure (PREM) in rheumatology: a cross-sectional online survey of Australian rheumatology outpatients.\",\"authors\":\"Madeleine J Bryant, Susan Lester, Oscar Russell, Samuel Whittle, Vidya Limaye, Susanna Proudman, Rachel J Black, Catherine L Hill\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00296-025-05882-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To determine rheumatology patient care experience using the novel Commissioning for Quality in Rheumatoid Arthritis-PREM-Australian version (CQRA-PREM-AU). Patients attending Central Adelaide Local Health Network rheumatology outpatient clinics were invited to complete a cross-sectional web-based survey, comprising CQRA-PREM-AU (22 items, 8 domains, scored 1-5), demographics, Patient Global Assessment (PGA) and Patient Reported Disease Activity (PRDA) Visual Analogue Scales (VAS) (scored 0-100), Single Item Literacy Screener (SILS). Analysed were multivariable linear regression analysis of CQRA-PREM-AU overall score with patient-related covariates (diagnosis, age, sex, SILS, PGA, PRDA), and univariate regression analysis with clinic-related covariates (site, nurse contact, type/number of consultations). Response rate was 1408/4591(31%). 214 incomplete records were excluded; 1194 records were analysed. Respondent characteristics: 68% female, median age 64 years (IQR 54, 73), 29% rural, 7% non-English language at home. PGA median score 50 (IQR 27, 63) and PRDA median score 50 (IQR 26, 69). CQRA-PREM-AU Domain 1 (regarding patient Needs and Preferences) had the best overall mean score (4.1, SD 0.86). Scored poorly were Domain 3 (Information about care, 3.5, SD 0.89), Domain 4 (Daily living, 3.5, SD 1.06) and Domain 5 (Emotional care, 3.6, SD 1.04). Worse PGA, and diagnoses of systemic lupus erythematosus, \\\"other\\\", or \\\"unknown\\\" were all associated with significantly lower CQRA-PREM-AU score (p < 0.01). Older age, and rheumatology nurse contact were associated with better experience score (p < 0.01). Use of CQRA-PREM-AU highlights the association between contact with a rheumatology nurse and better care experience, and identifies other targets for improving healthcare delivery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rheumatology International\",\"volume\":\"45 6\",\"pages\":\"138\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12062103/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rheumatology International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-025-05882-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-025-05882-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Implementation of a novel patient reported experience measure (PREM) in rheumatology: a cross-sectional online survey of Australian rheumatology outpatients.
To determine rheumatology patient care experience using the novel Commissioning for Quality in Rheumatoid Arthritis-PREM-Australian version (CQRA-PREM-AU). Patients attending Central Adelaide Local Health Network rheumatology outpatient clinics were invited to complete a cross-sectional web-based survey, comprising CQRA-PREM-AU (22 items, 8 domains, scored 1-5), demographics, Patient Global Assessment (PGA) and Patient Reported Disease Activity (PRDA) Visual Analogue Scales (VAS) (scored 0-100), Single Item Literacy Screener (SILS). Analysed were multivariable linear regression analysis of CQRA-PREM-AU overall score with patient-related covariates (diagnosis, age, sex, SILS, PGA, PRDA), and univariate regression analysis with clinic-related covariates (site, nurse contact, type/number of consultations). Response rate was 1408/4591(31%). 214 incomplete records were excluded; 1194 records were analysed. Respondent characteristics: 68% female, median age 64 years (IQR 54, 73), 29% rural, 7% non-English language at home. PGA median score 50 (IQR 27, 63) and PRDA median score 50 (IQR 26, 69). CQRA-PREM-AU Domain 1 (regarding patient Needs and Preferences) had the best overall mean score (4.1, SD 0.86). Scored poorly were Domain 3 (Information about care, 3.5, SD 0.89), Domain 4 (Daily living, 3.5, SD 1.06) and Domain 5 (Emotional care, 3.6, SD 1.04). Worse PGA, and diagnoses of systemic lupus erythematosus, "other", or "unknown" were all associated with significantly lower CQRA-PREM-AU score (p < 0.01). Older age, and rheumatology nurse contact were associated with better experience score (p < 0.01). Use of CQRA-PREM-AU highlights the association between contact with a rheumatology nurse and better care experience, and identifies other targets for improving healthcare delivery.
期刊介绍：
RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL is an independent journal reflecting world-wide progress in the research, diagnosis and treatment of the various rheumatic diseases. It is designed to serve researchers and clinicians in the field of rheumatology.
RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL will cover all modern trends in clinical research as well as in the management of rheumatic diseases. Special emphasis will be given to public health issues related to rheumatic diseases, applying rheumatology research to clinical practice, epidemiology of rheumatic diseases, diagnostic tests for rheumatic diseases, patient reported outcomes (PROs) in rheumatology and evidence on education of rheumatology. Contributions to these topics will appear in the form of original publications, short communications, editorials, and reviews. "Letters to the editor" will be welcome as an enhancement to discussion. Basic science research, including in vitro or animal studies, is discouraged to submit, as we will only review studies on humans with an epidemological or clinical perspective. Case reports without a proper review of the literatura (Case-based Reviews) will not be published. Every effort will be made to ensure speed of publication while maintaining a high standard of contents and production.
Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
