预测剖宫产风险的计算器:文献综述。

IF 4.3 4区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Shirley J Shao, Nasim C Sobhani
{"title":"预测剖宫产风险的计算器:文献综述。","authors":"Shirley J Shao, Nasim C Sobhani","doi":"10.1097/OGX.0000000000001372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Cesarean deliveries are associated with an increased risk of immediate- and long-term complications. Ideally, clinicians could accurately predict the risk of cesarean delivery and use this knowledge to decrease maternal morbidity due to failed labor without increasing rates of unnecessary cesarean delivery. To this end, multiple obstetric calculators for predicting cesarean risk in various clinical settings have been developed.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review describes major obstetric calculators for predicting risk of cesarean deliveries and discusses potential clinical applications, general accuracy, and limitations.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>An extensive manual review of primary research articles published on PubMed between January 2000 and February 2024 was performed. Pertinent articles that described the creation or validation of a scored system for predicting mode of delivery in an American population were reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multiple obstetric calculators have been developed and achieve fair discrimination and calibration in their derivation cohorts but do not maintain accuracy in external populations. This includes calculators that have already been applied to clinical practice, including calculators for predicting vaginal birth after cesarean and success of induction of labor.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Given the limited accuracy of cesarean calculators in external populations, caution is recommended when considering external implementation without further adjustment and refinement. Scores that overestimate cesarean delivery risk could falsely discourage vaginal delivery and negatively impact clinical care.</p><p><strong>Relevance: </strong>This review provides obstetric clinicians with context for interpreting obstetric calculators for predicting cesarean risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":19409,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey","volume":"80 4","pages":"241-248"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Calculators for Predicting Risk of Cesarean Delivery: A Literature Review.\",\"authors\":\"Shirley J Shao, Nasim C Sobhani\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/OGX.0000000000001372\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Cesarean deliveries are associated with an increased risk of immediate- and long-term complications. Ideally, clinicians could accurately predict the risk of cesarean delivery and use this knowledge to decrease maternal morbidity due to failed labor without increasing rates of unnecessary cesarean delivery. To this end, multiple obstetric calculators for predicting cesarean risk in various clinical settings have been developed.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review describes major obstetric calculators for predicting risk of cesarean deliveries and discusses potential clinical applications, general accuracy, and limitations.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>An extensive manual review of primary research articles published on PubMed between January 2000 and February 2024 was performed. Pertinent articles that described the creation or validation of a scored system for predicting mode of delivery in an American population were reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multiple obstetric calculators have been developed and achieve fair discrimination and calibration in their derivation cohorts but do not maintain accuracy in external populations. This includes calculators that have already been applied to clinical practice, including calculators for predicting vaginal birth after cesarean and success of induction of labor.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Given the limited accuracy of cesarean calculators in external populations, caution is recommended when considering external implementation without further adjustment and refinement. Scores that overestimate cesarean delivery risk could falsely discourage vaginal delivery and negatively impact clinical care.</p><p><strong>Relevance: </strong>This review provides obstetric clinicians with context for interpreting obstetric calculators for predicting cesarean risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19409,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey\",\"volume\":\"80 4\",\"pages\":\"241-248\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/OGX.0000000000001372\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OGX.0000000000001372","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:剖宫产与近期和长期并发症的风险增加有关。理想情况下,临床医生可以准确地预测剖宫产的风险,并利用这些知识来减少由于分娩失败而导致的产妇发病率,而不会增加不必要的剖宫产率。为此目的,已经开发了用于预测各种临床环境中剖宫产风险的多种产科计算器。目的:本文综述了预测剖宫产风险的主要产科计算器,并讨论了潜在的临床应用、一般准确性和局限性。证据获取:对2000年1月至2024年2月期间发表在PubMed上的主要研究文章进行了广泛的人工审查。相关的文章,描述了创建或验证评分系统预测模式交付在美国人口进行了审查。结果:多种产科计算器已经开发和实现公平的歧视和校准在其衍生队列,但不能保持准确性在外部人群。这包括已经应用于临床实践的计算器,包括预测剖宫产后阴道分娩和引产成功的计算器。结论:考虑到剖宫产计算器在外部人群中的准确性有限,建议谨慎考虑在未进一步调整和完善的情况下外部实施。过高估计剖宫产风险的评分可能会错误地阻止阴道分娩,并对临床护理产生负面影响。相关性:本综述为产科临床医生提供了解释产科计算器预测剖宫产风险的背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Calculators for Predicting Risk of Cesarean Delivery: A Literature Review.

Importance: Cesarean deliveries are associated with an increased risk of immediate- and long-term complications. Ideally, clinicians could accurately predict the risk of cesarean delivery and use this knowledge to decrease maternal morbidity due to failed labor without increasing rates of unnecessary cesarean delivery. To this end, multiple obstetric calculators for predicting cesarean risk in various clinical settings have been developed.

Objective: This review describes major obstetric calculators for predicting risk of cesarean deliveries and discusses potential clinical applications, general accuracy, and limitations.

Evidence acquisition: An extensive manual review of primary research articles published on PubMed between January 2000 and February 2024 was performed. Pertinent articles that described the creation or validation of a scored system for predicting mode of delivery in an American population were reviewed.

Results: Multiple obstetric calculators have been developed and achieve fair discrimination and calibration in their derivation cohorts but do not maintain accuracy in external populations. This includes calculators that have already been applied to clinical practice, including calculators for predicting vaginal birth after cesarean and success of induction of labor.

Conclusions: Given the limited accuracy of cesarean calculators in external populations, caution is recommended when considering external implementation without further adjustment and refinement. Scores that overestimate cesarean delivery risk could falsely discourage vaginal delivery and negatively impact clinical care.

Relevance: This review provides obstetric clinicians with context for interpreting obstetric calculators for predicting cesarean risk.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
3.20%
发文量
245
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​Each monthly issue of Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey presents summaries of the most timely and clinically relevant research being published worldwide. These concise, easy-to-read summaries provide expert insight into how to apply the latest research to patient care. The accompanying editorial commentary puts the studies into perspective and supplies authoritative guidance. The result is a valuable, time-saving resource for busy clinicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信