俯卧位与侧位后腹膜镜下肾部分切除术治疗成人后部肿瘤:技术和临床结果。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q4 ANDROLOGY
Translational andrology and urology Pub Date : 2025-03-30 Epub Date: 2025-03-26 DOI:10.21037/tau-2024-735
Qijie Zhang, Xianhua Shao, Yuanchen Lu, Junpeng Deng, Tengyue Zeng, Hongliang Que, Yi Sun, Zhongru Fan, Quan Li, Luwei Xu, Jianjun Xie
{"title":"俯卧位与侧位后腹膜镜下肾部分切除术治疗成人后部肿瘤:技术和临床结果。","authors":"Qijie Zhang, Xianhua Shao, Yuanchen Lu, Junpeng Deng, Tengyue Zeng, Hongliang Que, Yi Sun, Zhongru Fan, Quan Li, Luwei Xu, Jianjun Xie","doi":"10.21037/tau-2024-735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Very limited information is available about the prone retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy (RPN) in adults. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and clinical outcomes of prone RPN for posterior tumors in comparison with traditional lateral RPN in adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The recordings of 101 patients underwent RPN from January 2018 to March 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Fifty-nine patients underwent surgeries with lateral RPN, and 42 underwent surgeries with prone RPN. Operative time, warm ischemia time, blood loss, renal function, operative complications, and arterial blood gas analysis were recorded and compared between the two groups. Additionally, a dorsal deviation score (DDS) was developed to quantitate the degree to which the tumor was dorsal, which helped to select a suitable operative approach clinically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients in prone RPN group had shorter operative time (P<0.001), warm ischemia time (P=0.003), and less blood loss (P=0.03) in comparison with lateral RPN. In arterial blood gas analysis, no significant differences in arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO<sub>2</sub>), arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO<sub>2</sub>), and pH were observed between two groups before the operation and 30 min after positioning. For slightly posterior tumors (DDS =1), no significant difference in above parameters was observed. However, shorter operative time (P=0.03, P<0.001, respectively), warm ischemia time (P=0.02, P=0.03, respectively), and less blood loss (P=0.08, P=0.043, respectively) were noticed in prone RPN for moderate or severe posterior (DDS =2 or 3) tumors, especially posterior hilar tumors. Difference in renal function between two groups was insignificant. As for complications, a higher incidence of intraoperative complications appeared in lateral RPN group (11.9%) compared with prone RPN (2.4%), whereas there was no significant difference in postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Prone RPN is a feasible operative approach in clinical practice, and is superior to lateral RPN for moderate to severe posterior tumors, especially posterior hilar tumors.</p>","PeriodicalId":23270,"journal":{"name":"Translational andrology and urology","volume":"14 3","pages":"567-577"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11986475/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prone versus lateral retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy for posterior tumors in adults: technique and clinical outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Qijie Zhang, Xianhua Shao, Yuanchen Lu, Junpeng Deng, Tengyue Zeng, Hongliang Que, Yi Sun, Zhongru Fan, Quan Li, Luwei Xu, Jianjun Xie\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/tau-2024-735\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Very limited information is available about the prone retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy (RPN) in adults. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and clinical outcomes of prone RPN for posterior tumors in comparison with traditional lateral RPN in adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The recordings of 101 patients underwent RPN from January 2018 to March 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Fifty-nine patients underwent surgeries with lateral RPN, and 42 underwent surgeries with prone RPN. Operative time, warm ischemia time, blood loss, renal function, operative complications, and arterial blood gas analysis were recorded and compared between the two groups. Additionally, a dorsal deviation score (DDS) was developed to quantitate the degree to which the tumor was dorsal, which helped to select a suitable operative approach clinically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients in prone RPN group had shorter operative time (P<0.001), warm ischemia time (P=0.003), and less blood loss (P=0.03) in comparison with lateral RPN. In arterial blood gas analysis, no significant differences in arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO<sub>2</sub>), arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO<sub>2</sub>), and pH were observed between two groups before the operation and 30 min after positioning. For slightly posterior tumors (DDS =1), no significant difference in above parameters was observed. However, shorter operative time (P=0.03, P<0.001, respectively), warm ischemia time (P=0.02, P=0.03, respectively), and less blood loss (P=0.08, P=0.043, respectively) were noticed in prone RPN for moderate or severe posterior (DDS =2 or 3) tumors, especially posterior hilar tumors. Difference in renal function between two groups was insignificant. As for complications, a higher incidence of intraoperative complications appeared in lateral RPN group (11.9%) compared with prone RPN (2.4%), whereas there was no significant difference in postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Prone RPN is a feasible operative approach in clinical practice, and is superior to lateral RPN for moderate to severe posterior tumors, especially posterior hilar tumors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23270,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational andrology and urology\",\"volume\":\"14 3\",\"pages\":\"567-577\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11986475/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational andrology and urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/tau-2024-735\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ANDROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational andrology and urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tau-2024-735","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANDROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:关于成人俯卧后腹膜镜下部分肾切除术(RPN)的信息非常有限。本研究旨在评估成人后路肿瘤采用俯卧位RPN与传统侧位RPN的可行性和临床结果。方法:回顾性分析2018年1月至2023年3月101例RPN患者的手术记录。59例患者行外侧RPN手术,42例患者行俯卧RPN手术。记录两组患者手术时间、热缺血时间、出血量、肾功能、手术并发症、动脉血气分析并进行比较。此外,采用背侧偏移评分(DDS)来量化肿瘤的背侧程度,这有助于临床上选择合适的手术入路。结果:俯卧位RPN组患者手术时间(P2)短,两组患者术前及体位后30min动脉血氧分压(PaO2)、pH值比较。对于稍后端肿瘤(DDS =1),上述参数无显著差异。结论:俯卧位RPN是临床可行的手术入路,治疗中重度后路肿瘤,特别是门后肿瘤优于侧卧位RPN。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prone versus lateral retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy for posterior tumors in adults: technique and clinical outcomes.

Background: Very limited information is available about the prone retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy (RPN) in adults. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and clinical outcomes of prone RPN for posterior tumors in comparison with traditional lateral RPN in adults.

Methods: The recordings of 101 patients underwent RPN from January 2018 to March 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Fifty-nine patients underwent surgeries with lateral RPN, and 42 underwent surgeries with prone RPN. Operative time, warm ischemia time, blood loss, renal function, operative complications, and arterial blood gas analysis were recorded and compared between the two groups. Additionally, a dorsal deviation score (DDS) was developed to quantitate the degree to which the tumor was dorsal, which helped to select a suitable operative approach clinically.

Results: Patients in prone RPN group had shorter operative time (P<0.001), warm ischemia time (P=0.003), and less blood loss (P=0.03) in comparison with lateral RPN. In arterial blood gas analysis, no significant differences in arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2), arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2), and pH were observed between two groups before the operation and 30 min after positioning. For slightly posterior tumors (DDS =1), no significant difference in above parameters was observed. However, shorter operative time (P=0.03, P<0.001, respectively), warm ischemia time (P=0.02, P=0.03, respectively), and less blood loss (P=0.08, P=0.043, respectively) were noticed in prone RPN for moderate or severe posterior (DDS =2 or 3) tumors, especially posterior hilar tumors. Difference in renal function between two groups was insignificant. As for complications, a higher incidence of intraoperative complications appeared in lateral RPN group (11.9%) compared with prone RPN (2.4%), whereas there was no significant difference in postoperative complications.

Conclusions: Prone RPN is a feasible operative approach in clinical practice, and is superior to lateral RPN for moderate to severe posterior tumors, especially posterior hilar tumors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: ranslational Andrology and Urology (Print ISSN 2223-4683; Online ISSN 2223-4691; Transl Androl Urol; TAU) is an open access, peer-reviewed, bi-monthly journal (quarterly published from Mar.2012 - Dec. 2014). The main focus of the journal is to describe new findings in the field of translational research of Andrology and Urology, provides current and practical information on basic research and clinical investigations of Andrology and Urology. Specific areas of interest include, but not limited to, molecular study, pathology, biology and technical advances related to andrology and urology. Topics cover range from evaluation, prevention, diagnosis, therapy, prognosis, rehabilitation and future challenges to urology and andrology. Contributions pertinent to urology and andrology are also included from related fields such as public health, basic sciences, education, sociology, and nursing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信