情绪调节困难与心理社会功能通过特质焦虑水平在缓解双相情感障碍患者。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Sezgi İlke Danacı Sezgin, Tayfun Turan, Akif Asdemir, Saliha Özsoy
{"title":"情绪调节困难与心理社会功能通过特质焦虑水平在缓解双相情感障碍患者。","authors":"Sezgi İlke Danacı Sezgin, Tayfun Turan, Akif Asdemir, Saliha Özsoy","doi":"10.1080/13651501.2025.2492159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to determine the effects of anxiety levels and emotion dysregulation on each other and their effects on psychosocial functioning in remitted BD patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-six patients with BD and 38 healthy controls were included in this study. All the patients were assessed with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, the Young Mania Rating Scale, the Bipolar Disorder Functioning Questionnaire, the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS). Healthy controls were only assessed with the STAI and the DERS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>STAI and DERS scores were significantly higher in the patient group than in the control group. Higher scores of STAI and DERS were found to be associated with lower functionality in the patient group. The trait anxiety scores explained 22% of the variance in the psychosocial functionality scores of the patients while the total DERS score explained 51.5% of the variance in the trait anxiety scores. Patients on lithium treatment had less difficulty in regulating their emotions than those on valproic acid treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In light of these findings, planning interventions for emotion regulation difficulties during the management of patients would reduce anxiety levels and contribute to improving patients' psychosocial functionality.</p>","PeriodicalId":14351,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":"51-56"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emotion regulation difficulties are associated with psychosocial functioning via trait anxiety levels in remitted bipolar disorder patients.\",\"authors\":\"Sezgi İlke Danacı Sezgin, Tayfun Turan, Akif Asdemir, Saliha Özsoy\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13651501.2025.2492159\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to determine the effects of anxiety levels and emotion dysregulation on each other and their effects on psychosocial functioning in remitted BD patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-six patients with BD and 38 healthy controls were included in this study. All the patients were assessed with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, the Young Mania Rating Scale, the Bipolar Disorder Functioning Questionnaire, the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS). Healthy controls were only assessed with the STAI and the DERS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>STAI and DERS scores were significantly higher in the patient group than in the control group. Higher scores of STAI and DERS were found to be associated with lower functionality in the patient group. The trait anxiety scores explained 22% of the variance in the psychosocial functionality scores of the patients while the total DERS score explained 51.5% of the variance in the trait anxiety scores. Patients on lithium treatment had less difficulty in regulating their emotions than those on valproic acid treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In light of these findings, planning interventions for emotion regulation difficulties during the management of patients would reduce anxiety levels and contribute to improving patients' psychosocial functionality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14351,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"51-56\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13651501.2025.2492159\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13651501.2025.2492159","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是确定焦虑水平和情绪失调相互影响及其对双相障碍缓解患者心理社会功能的影响。方法:选取66例双相障碍患者和38例健康对照。采用汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表、青年躁狂症评定量表、双相情感障碍功能问卷、状态-特质焦虑量表(STAI)和情绪调节困难量表(DERS)进行评定。健康对照仅用STAI和DERS进行评估。结果:患者组STAI和DERS评分明显高于对照组。在患者组中,较高的STAI和DERS评分与较低的功能相关。特质焦虑得分解释了患者心理社会功能得分22%的方差,而总DERS得分解释了特质焦虑得分51.5%的方差。接受锂治疗的患者在调节情绪方面比接受丙戊酸治疗的患者困难得多。结论:根据这些发现,在患者管理过程中,对情绪调节困难的干预计划将降低患者的焦虑水平,并有助于改善患者的社会心理功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Emotion regulation difficulties are associated with psychosocial functioning via trait anxiety levels in remitted bipolar disorder patients.

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the effects of anxiety levels and emotion dysregulation on each other and their effects on psychosocial functioning in remitted BD patients.

Methods: Sixty-six patients with BD and 38 healthy controls were included in this study. All the patients were assessed with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, the Young Mania Rating Scale, the Bipolar Disorder Functioning Questionnaire, the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS). Healthy controls were only assessed with the STAI and the DERS.

Results: STAI and DERS scores were significantly higher in the patient group than in the control group. Higher scores of STAI and DERS were found to be associated with lower functionality in the patient group. The trait anxiety scores explained 22% of the variance in the psychosocial functionality scores of the patients while the total DERS score explained 51.5% of the variance in the trait anxiety scores. Patients on lithium treatment had less difficulty in regulating their emotions than those on valproic acid treatment.

Conclusions: In light of these findings, planning interventions for emotion regulation difficulties during the management of patients would reduce anxiety levels and contribute to improving patients' psychosocial functionality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
42
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice provides an international forum for communication among health professionals with clinical, academic and research interests in psychiatry. The journal gives particular emphasis to papers that integrate the findings of academic research into realities of clinical practice. Focus on the practical aspects of managing and treating patients. Essential reading for the busy psychiatrist, trainee and interested physician. Includes original research papers, comprehensive review articles and short communications. Key words: Psychiatry, Neuropsychopharmacology, Mental health, Neuropsychiatry, Clinical Neurophysiology, Psychophysiology, Psychotherapy, Addiction, Schizophrenia, Depression, Bipolar Disorders and Anxiety.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信