马来西亚临床恙螨体外抗真菌药敏分析。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Infection and Drug Resistance Pub Date : 2025-05-05 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/IDR.S513536
Xue Ting Tan, Nurin Nazirah Mokhtar, Murnihayati Hassan, Min Moon Tang
{"title":"马来西亚临床恙螨体外抗真菌药敏分析。","authors":"Xue Ting Tan, Nurin Nazirah Mokhtar, Murnihayati Hassan, Min Moon Tang","doi":"10.2147/IDR.S513536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to determine the antifungal susceptibility pattern of clinical <i>Cladophialophora boppii</i> isolates in Malaysia.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Eight clinical strains of the <i>C. boppii</i> were received from various Malaysian hospitals from the year 2020 until 2024. The isolates were obtained from patients with clinical presentations suggestive of cutaneous fungal infection. Their identities were determined using microscopic, macroscopic and molecular methods, specifically internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequencing. Next, the antifungal susceptibility of amphotericin B, itraconazole, fluconazole, voriconazole, ravuconazole, posaconazole, ketoconazole, isavuconazole, flucytosine and terbinafine against the <i>C. boppii</i> were determined using broth microdilution method as outlined in the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) M38 guideline. The geometric means (GM) of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), MIC<sub>50</sub>, and MIC<sub>90</sub> were determined for each antifungal. Subsequently, the Kruskal-Wallis test was performed to determine the significant difference observed in the median MIC values between the different antifungal groups (azole, polyene, pyrimidine and allylamine) against the isolate. The significance value was set at <i>p</i><0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The GM MIC, MIC<sub>50</sub> and MIC<sub>90</sub> of all tested antifungals except amphotericin B and fluconazole against the <i>C. boppii</i> were ≤0.25 μg/mL. In contrast, amphotericin B and fluconazole exhibited higher MICs ranging from 2 to 16 μg/mL. Furthermore, the Kruskal-Wallis test revealed a significant difference in the median MIC values across all antifungals, with a <i>p</i>-value of 4.94 × 10⁻<sup>5</sup>.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, all the <i>C. boppii</i> isolates in this study were susceptible to pyrimidine, allylamine, and azoles, while showing intermediate susceptibility to fluconazole and notable resistance to amphotericin B. Additionally, itraconazole and terbinafine could be recommended as the first-line therapy option, which was supported by their demonstrated efficacy (MIC ≤0.03 μg/mL) and clinical improvement observed in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":13577,"journal":{"name":"Infection and Drug Resistance","volume":"18 ","pages":"2291-2299"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12063617/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In vitro Antifungal Susceptibility Profile of Clinical <i>Cladophialophora boppii</i> in Malaysia.\",\"authors\":\"Xue Ting Tan, Nurin Nazirah Mokhtar, Murnihayati Hassan, Min Moon Tang\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/IDR.S513536\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to determine the antifungal susceptibility pattern of clinical <i>Cladophialophora boppii</i> isolates in Malaysia.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Eight clinical strains of the <i>C. boppii</i> were received from various Malaysian hospitals from the year 2020 until 2024. The isolates were obtained from patients with clinical presentations suggestive of cutaneous fungal infection. Their identities were determined using microscopic, macroscopic and molecular methods, specifically internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequencing. Next, the antifungal susceptibility of amphotericin B, itraconazole, fluconazole, voriconazole, ravuconazole, posaconazole, ketoconazole, isavuconazole, flucytosine and terbinafine against the <i>C. boppii</i> were determined using broth microdilution method as outlined in the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) M38 guideline. The geometric means (GM) of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), MIC<sub>50</sub>, and MIC<sub>90</sub> were determined for each antifungal. Subsequently, the Kruskal-Wallis test was performed to determine the significant difference observed in the median MIC values between the different antifungal groups (azole, polyene, pyrimidine and allylamine) against the isolate. The significance value was set at <i>p</i><0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The GM MIC, MIC<sub>50</sub> and MIC<sub>90</sub> of all tested antifungals except amphotericin B and fluconazole against the <i>C. boppii</i> were ≤0.25 μg/mL. In contrast, amphotericin B and fluconazole exhibited higher MICs ranging from 2 to 16 μg/mL. Furthermore, the Kruskal-Wallis test revealed a significant difference in the median MIC values across all antifungals, with a <i>p</i>-value of 4.94 × 10⁻<sup>5</sup>.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, all the <i>C. boppii</i> isolates in this study were susceptible to pyrimidine, allylamine, and azoles, while showing intermediate susceptibility to fluconazole and notable resistance to amphotericin B. Additionally, itraconazole and terbinafine could be recommended as the first-line therapy option, which was supported by their demonstrated efficacy (MIC ≤0.03 μg/mL) and clinical improvement observed in this study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13577,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infection and Drug Resistance\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"2291-2299\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12063617/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infection and Drug Resistance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S513536\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection and Drug Resistance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S513536","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在确定马来西亚临床分离株的抗真菌药敏模式。患者和方法:从2020年到2024年,从马来西亚各医院接收了8株临床感染的boppii。这些分离株是从临床表现提示皮肤真菌感染的患者中获得的。通过微观、宏观和分子方法,特别是内部转录间隔序列(ITS)测序,确定了它们的身份。其次,根据临床与实验室标准协会(CLSI) M38指南,采用肉汤微量稀释法测定两性霉素B、伊曲康唑、氟康唑、伏立康唑、拉武康唑、泊沙康唑、酮康唑、异唑康唑、氟胞嘧啶和特比萘芬对布氏伊蚊的抗真菌敏感性。测定各抗真菌药的最小抑菌浓度(MIC)、MIC50和MIC90的几何平均值(GM)。随后,进行Kruskal-Wallis检验,以确定不同抗真菌组(唑、多烯、嘧啶和烯丙胺)对分离物的MIC值中位数的显著差异。结果:除两性霉素B和氟康唑外,所有抗真菌药物对布氏库蚊的GM MIC、MIC50和MIC90均≤0.25 μg/mL。两性霉素B和氟康唑的mic值较高,为2 ~ 16 μg/mL。此外,Kruskal-Wallis测试显示,所有抗真菌药物的MIC值中位数有显著差异,p值为4.94 × 10毒血症。结论:本研究分离株对嘧啶类、烯丙胺类、唑类均敏感,对氟康唑呈中等敏感性,对两性霉素b呈显著耐药。伊曲康唑和特比萘芬疗效显著(MIC≤0.03 μg/mL),且本研究观察到临床改善,推荐作为一线治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In vitro Antifungal Susceptibility Profile of Clinical Cladophialophora boppii in Malaysia.

Purpose: This study aimed to determine the antifungal susceptibility pattern of clinical Cladophialophora boppii isolates in Malaysia.

Patients and methods: Eight clinical strains of the C. boppii were received from various Malaysian hospitals from the year 2020 until 2024. The isolates were obtained from patients with clinical presentations suggestive of cutaneous fungal infection. Their identities were determined using microscopic, macroscopic and molecular methods, specifically internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequencing. Next, the antifungal susceptibility of amphotericin B, itraconazole, fluconazole, voriconazole, ravuconazole, posaconazole, ketoconazole, isavuconazole, flucytosine and terbinafine against the C. boppii were determined using broth microdilution method as outlined in the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) M38 guideline. The geometric means (GM) of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), MIC50, and MIC90 were determined for each antifungal. Subsequently, the Kruskal-Wallis test was performed to determine the significant difference observed in the median MIC values between the different antifungal groups (azole, polyene, pyrimidine and allylamine) against the isolate. The significance value was set at p<0.05.

Results: The GM MIC, MIC50 and MIC90 of all tested antifungals except amphotericin B and fluconazole against the C. boppii were ≤0.25 μg/mL. In contrast, amphotericin B and fluconazole exhibited higher MICs ranging from 2 to 16 μg/mL. Furthermore, the Kruskal-Wallis test revealed a significant difference in the median MIC values across all antifungals, with a p-value of 4.94 × 10⁻5.

Conclusion: In conclusion, all the C. boppii isolates in this study were susceptible to pyrimidine, allylamine, and azoles, while showing intermediate susceptibility to fluconazole and notable resistance to amphotericin B. Additionally, itraconazole and terbinafine could be recommended as the first-line therapy option, which was supported by their demonstrated efficacy (MIC ≤0.03 μg/mL) and clinical improvement observed in this study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Infection and Drug Resistance
Infection and Drug Resistance Medicine-Pharmacology (medical)
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
826
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: About Journal Editors Peer Reviewers Articles Article Publishing Charges Aims and Scope Call For Papers ISSN: 1178-6973 Editor-in-Chief: Professor Suresh Antony An international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that focuses on the optimal treatment of infection (bacterial, fungal and viral) and the development and institution of preventative strategies to minimize the development and spread of resistance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信