Hiago L R Souza, Philip Hurst, Géssyca T Oliveira, Anderson Meireles, Rhaí A Arriel, Rodrigo Hohl, Marco A C Garcia, Moacir Marocolo
{"title":"积极和消极言语指示与假性缺血预处理相关的训练男性膝关节伸展阻力运动的中度改善。","authors":"Hiago L R Souza, Philip Hurst, Géssyca T Oliveira, Anderson Meireles, Rhaí A Arriel, Rodrigo Hohl, Marco A C Garcia, Moacir Marocolo","doi":"10.1123/ijspp.2024-0217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To verify the effects of positive and negative verbal instructions regarding sham ischemic preconditioning (sham-IPC) on leg-extension resistance-exercise performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-five trained men were randomized to 1 of 3 groups: positive expectation, negative expectation, or control. Participants completed leg-extension strength tests in 4 trials (2 familiarization, 1 baseline, and 1 experimental). Experimental trials consisted of participants' receiving sham-IPC (3 × 5 cycles at only 20 mmHg). In positive- and negative-expectation groups, participants received verbal instructions that would improve or worsen performance, respectively. Controls did not receive any verbal suggestion. Outcomes were maximum number of repetitions, maximal isometric voluntary contraction, and muscle power output.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Expectations about sham-IPC were significantly higher in the positive-expectation than in the negative-expectation and control groups. Participants in the positive group reported a significantly greater number of repetitions than both the negative-expectation (d = 1.11) and control groups (d = 0.77). No differences between groups were shown for maximal isometric voluntary contraction (d range = 0.05-0.67) and power output (d range = -0.08 to 1.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results highlight the importance of measuring expectations prior to sham-IPC, which may significantly influence the results of randomized controlled trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":14295,"journal":{"name":"International journal of sports physiology and performance","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Positive and Negative Verbal Instructions Associated With Sham Ischemic Preconditioning Moderate Improvements of Knee-Extension Resistance Exercise in Trained Men.\",\"authors\":\"Hiago L R Souza, Philip Hurst, Géssyca T Oliveira, Anderson Meireles, Rhaí A Arriel, Rodrigo Hohl, Marco A C Garcia, Moacir Marocolo\",\"doi\":\"10.1123/ijspp.2024-0217\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To verify the effects of positive and negative verbal instructions regarding sham ischemic preconditioning (sham-IPC) on leg-extension resistance-exercise performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-five trained men were randomized to 1 of 3 groups: positive expectation, negative expectation, or control. Participants completed leg-extension strength tests in 4 trials (2 familiarization, 1 baseline, and 1 experimental). Experimental trials consisted of participants' receiving sham-IPC (3 × 5 cycles at only 20 mmHg). In positive- and negative-expectation groups, participants received verbal instructions that would improve or worsen performance, respectively. Controls did not receive any verbal suggestion. Outcomes were maximum number of repetitions, maximal isometric voluntary contraction, and muscle power output.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Expectations about sham-IPC were significantly higher in the positive-expectation than in the negative-expectation and control groups. Participants in the positive group reported a significantly greater number of repetitions than both the negative-expectation (d = 1.11) and control groups (d = 0.77). No differences between groups were shown for maximal isometric voluntary contraction (d range = 0.05-0.67) and power output (d range = -0.08 to 1.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results highlight the importance of measuring expectations prior to sham-IPC, which may significantly influence the results of randomized controlled trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14295,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of sports physiology and performance\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of sports physiology and performance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2024-0217\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of sports physiology and performance","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2024-0217","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Positive and Negative Verbal Instructions Associated With Sham Ischemic Preconditioning Moderate Improvements of Knee-Extension Resistance Exercise in Trained Men.
Purpose: To verify the effects of positive and negative verbal instructions regarding sham ischemic preconditioning (sham-IPC) on leg-extension resistance-exercise performance.
Methods: Thirty-five trained men were randomized to 1 of 3 groups: positive expectation, negative expectation, or control. Participants completed leg-extension strength tests in 4 trials (2 familiarization, 1 baseline, and 1 experimental). Experimental trials consisted of participants' receiving sham-IPC (3 × 5 cycles at only 20 mmHg). In positive- and negative-expectation groups, participants received verbal instructions that would improve or worsen performance, respectively. Controls did not receive any verbal suggestion. Outcomes were maximum number of repetitions, maximal isometric voluntary contraction, and muscle power output.
Results: Expectations about sham-IPC were significantly higher in the positive-expectation than in the negative-expectation and control groups. Participants in the positive group reported a significantly greater number of repetitions than both the negative-expectation (d = 1.11) and control groups (d = 0.77). No differences between groups were shown for maximal isometric voluntary contraction (d range = 0.05-0.67) and power output (d range = -0.08 to 1.02).
Conclusions: Our results highlight the importance of measuring expectations prior to sham-IPC, which may significantly influence the results of randomized controlled trials.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance (IJSPP) focuses on sport physiology and performance and is dedicated to advancing the knowledge of sport and exercise physiologists, sport-performance researchers, and other sport scientists. The journal publishes authoritative peer-reviewed research in sport physiology and related disciplines, with an emphasis on work having direct practical applications in enhancing sport performance in sport physiology and related disciplines. IJSPP publishes 10 issues per year: January, February, March, April, May, July, August, September, October, and November.