Ahmed Abdel Mohymen, Hamed Ibrahim Farag, Sameh M Reda, Ahmed Soltan Monem, Said Abdelfattah Ali
{"title":"Discovery 710正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描重建参数优化","authors":"Ahmed Abdel Mohymen, Hamed Ibrahim Farag, Sameh M Reda, Ahmed Soltan Monem, Said Abdelfattah Ali","doi":"10.4103/jmp.jmp_167_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to optimize the quantitative aspects of (<sup>18</sup>F) fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) imaging by investigating the impact of various reconstruction parameters on the recovery coefficients (RCs) using the NEMA image quality phantom. Specifically, the study aims to assess how different matrix sizes, iterations, subsets, and Gaussian postfilters affect the accuracy of standardized uptake value (SUV) quantification in (<sup>18</sup>F) FDG PET/CT imaging.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study utilized the \"Vue Point FX + Sharp IR\" algorithm for PET image reconstruction, incorporating 3D-ordered subset expectation maximization (3D-OSEM), time-of-flight, and point spread function technologies. Various reconstruction parameters were explored, including two distinct matrix sizes, multiple iterations, subsets, and a wide range of Gaussian postfilters. The investigation focused on the impact of these parameters on RCs using the NEMA image quality phantom.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results of the study indicated that for accurate SUV quantification in spheres ≥17 mm, the 256 × 256 matrix size and mean SUV should be employed. Conversely, for spheres ≤13 mm, maximum SUV was found to be more suitable. The choice of postfiltering value was shown to have a significant impact on SUV quantification accuracy, particularly for small-sized spheres. In addition, a larger matrix size was found to partially mitigate the effects of Gibbs artifact and slightly enhance SUV quantification for the spheres of various sizes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the critical importance of optimizing PET reconstruction parameters in accordance with the guidelines set by European Association of Nuclear Medicine/EARL. By optimizing these parameters, the accuracy and reliability of SUV quantification in (<sup>18</sup>F) FDG PET imaging can be significantly enhanced, especially for small-sized spheres. This underscores the necessity of carefully considering reconstruction parameters to ensure precise and reliable quantitative measurements in PET/CT imaging.</p>","PeriodicalId":51719,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Physics","volume":"50 1","pages":"118-130"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12005667/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimization of Reconstruction Parameters for Discovery 710 Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography.\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed Abdel Mohymen, Hamed Ibrahim Farag, Sameh M Reda, Ahmed Soltan Monem, Said Abdelfattah Ali\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jmp.jmp_167_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to optimize the quantitative aspects of (<sup>18</sup>F) fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) imaging by investigating the impact of various reconstruction parameters on the recovery coefficients (RCs) using the NEMA image quality phantom. Specifically, the study aims to assess how different matrix sizes, iterations, subsets, and Gaussian postfilters affect the accuracy of standardized uptake value (SUV) quantification in (<sup>18</sup>F) FDG PET/CT imaging.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study utilized the \\\"Vue Point FX + Sharp IR\\\" algorithm for PET image reconstruction, incorporating 3D-ordered subset expectation maximization (3D-OSEM), time-of-flight, and point spread function technologies. Various reconstruction parameters were explored, including two distinct matrix sizes, multiple iterations, subsets, and a wide range of Gaussian postfilters. The investigation focused on the impact of these parameters on RCs using the NEMA image quality phantom.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results of the study indicated that for accurate SUV quantification in spheres ≥17 mm, the 256 × 256 matrix size and mean SUV should be employed. Conversely, for spheres ≤13 mm, maximum SUV was found to be more suitable. The choice of postfiltering value was shown to have a significant impact on SUV quantification accuracy, particularly for small-sized spheres. In addition, a larger matrix size was found to partially mitigate the effects of Gibbs artifact and slightly enhance SUV quantification for the spheres of various sizes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the critical importance of optimizing PET reconstruction parameters in accordance with the guidelines set by European Association of Nuclear Medicine/EARL. By optimizing these parameters, the accuracy and reliability of SUV quantification in (<sup>18</sup>F) FDG PET imaging can be significantly enhanced, especially for small-sized spheres. This underscores the necessity of carefully considering reconstruction parameters to ensure precise and reliable quantitative measurements in PET/CT imaging.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51719,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Physics\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"118-130\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12005667/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmp.jmp_167_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmp.jmp_167_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:利用NEMA图像质量模型,研究不同重建参数对恢复系数(rc)的影响,优化(18F)氟脱氧葡萄糖(FDG)正电子发射断层扫描(PET)/计算机断层扫描(CT)成像的定量方面。具体而言,该研究旨在评估不同的矩阵大小、迭代、子集和高斯后滤波器如何影响(18F) FDG PET/CT成像中标准化摄取值(SUV)量化的准确性。材料和方法:本研究利用“Vue Point FX + Sharp IR”算法进行PET图像重建,结合3d有序子集期望最大化(3D-OSEM)、飞行时间和点扩散函数技术。研究了各种重构参数,包括两种不同的矩阵大小、多次迭代、子集和广泛的高斯后滤波器。研究的重点是使用NEMA图像质量模型研究这些参数对rc的影响。结果:研究结果表明,要在≥17 mm的球中准确定量SUV,应采用256 × 256的矩阵尺寸和平均SUV。相反,对于≤13 mm的球体,最大SUV更为合适。后滤波值的选择对SUV量化精度有显著影响,特别是对于小尺寸球体。此外,更大的矩阵尺寸可以部分减轻吉布斯伪影的影响,并略微增强不同尺寸球体的SUV量化。结论:本研究强调了根据欧洲核医学协会/EARL制定的指南优化PET重建参数的重要性。通过优化这些参数,可以显著提高(18F) FDG PET成像中SUV定量的准确性和可靠性,尤其是对小尺寸球体的定量。这强调了仔细考虑重建参数的必要性,以确保PET/CT成像中精确可靠的定量测量。
Optimization of Reconstruction Parameters for Discovery 710 Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography.
Aim: This study aimed to optimize the quantitative aspects of (18F) fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) imaging by investigating the impact of various reconstruction parameters on the recovery coefficients (RCs) using the NEMA image quality phantom. Specifically, the study aims to assess how different matrix sizes, iterations, subsets, and Gaussian postfilters affect the accuracy of standardized uptake value (SUV) quantification in (18F) FDG PET/CT imaging.
Materials and methods: The study utilized the "Vue Point FX + Sharp IR" algorithm for PET image reconstruction, incorporating 3D-ordered subset expectation maximization (3D-OSEM), time-of-flight, and point spread function technologies. Various reconstruction parameters were explored, including two distinct matrix sizes, multiple iterations, subsets, and a wide range of Gaussian postfilters. The investigation focused on the impact of these parameters on RCs using the NEMA image quality phantom.
Results: The results of the study indicated that for accurate SUV quantification in spheres ≥17 mm, the 256 × 256 matrix size and mean SUV should be employed. Conversely, for spheres ≤13 mm, maximum SUV was found to be more suitable. The choice of postfiltering value was shown to have a significant impact on SUV quantification accuracy, particularly for small-sized spheres. In addition, a larger matrix size was found to partially mitigate the effects of Gibbs artifact and slightly enhance SUV quantification for the spheres of various sizes.
Conclusion: This study highlights the critical importance of optimizing PET reconstruction parameters in accordance with the guidelines set by European Association of Nuclear Medicine/EARL. By optimizing these parameters, the accuracy and reliability of SUV quantification in (18F) FDG PET imaging can be significantly enhanced, especially for small-sized spheres. This underscores the necessity of carefully considering reconstruction parameters to ensure precise and reliable quantitative measurements in PET/CT imaging.
期刊介绍:
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS is the official journal of Association of Medical Physicists of India (AMPI). The association has been bringing out a quarterly publication since 1976. Till the end of 1993, it was known as Medical Physics Bulletin, which then became Journal of Medical Physics. The main objective of the Journal is to serve as a vehicle of communication to highlight all aspects of the practice of medical radiation physics. The areas covered include all aspects of the application of radiation physics to biological sciences, radiotherapy, radiodiagnosis, nuclear medicine, dosimetry and radiation protection. Papers / manuscripts dealing with the aspects of physics related to cancer therapy / radiobiology also fall within the scope of the journal.