妊娠期HbA1c与贫血的相关性研究。

IF 0.7 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Shalini Mishra, Vinita Das, Smriti Agrawal
{"title":"妊娠期HbA1c与贫血的相关性研究。","authors":"Shalini Mishra, Vinita Das, Smriti Agrawal","doi":"10.1007/s13224-025-02108-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>HbA1c is a biochemical marker to evaluate hyperglycemia status in past 2-3 months. HbA1c ≥ 6.5% is diagnostic criteria for diabetes mellitus according to the American Diabetes Association. Recent studies suggest that anemia alters HbA1c levels, but results are conflicting. This study was planned to understand utility of HbA1c in relation to hemoglobin (Hb) for the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and also to understand if HbA1c can be used as a screening modality for diagnosis of GDM in countries with higher anemia prevalence.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An observational study was conducted on 193 pregnant women of < 16-week gestation attending antenatal OPD of Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, KGMU, Lucknow, over a period of one year. Blood glucose levels 2 h after ingestion of 75 gm glucose load irrespective of last meal (DIPSI criterion) were determined at 3 antenatal visits along with HbA1c and Hb level and categorized into diabetic and nondiabetic and anemic and non-anemic group. These patients were followed up till delivery to look for various maternal and neonatal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total 416 tests were done for hemoglobin and HbA1c in 193 women. Prevalence of GDM was 32.1%. Cutoff level of HbA1c was 4.8% in our study which also varied according to gestation. Mean HbA1c level found to be higher in anemic compared to non-anemic (4.5 vs. 3.96%) in nondiabetic women. Similar to that in women with GDM, mean HbA1c in anemic women (5.1) was higher compared to non-anemic (4.6) women.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study clearly shows that mean HbA1c varies across all trimesters; even though in diabetic women, mean HbA1c was higher as compared to nondiabetic, and it showed a statistically significant difference in the presence of anemia. HbA1c showed an inverse correlation with hemoglobin in women with or without GDM. Mean HbA1c level was higher among anemic women in both diabetic and nondiabetic group.</p>","PeriodicalId":51563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India","volume":"75 2","pages":"160-165"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12064546/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Study of Correlation of HbA1c with Anemia in Pregnancy.\",\"authors\":\"Shalini Mishra, Vinita Das, Smriti Agrawal\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13224-025-02108-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>HbA1c is a biochemical marker to evaluate hyperglycemia status in past 2-3 months. HbA1c ≥ 6.5% is diagnostic criteria for diabetes mellitus according to the American Diabetes Association. Recent studies suggest that anemia alters HbA1c levels, but results are conflicting. This study was planned to understand utility of HbA1c in relation to hemoglobin (Hb) for the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and also to understand if HbA1c can be used as a screening modality for diagnosis of GDM in countries with higher anemia prevalence.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An observational study was conducted on 193 pregnant women of < 16-week gestation attending antenatal OPD of Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, KGMU, Lucknow, over a period of one year. Blood glucose levels 2 h after ingestion of 75 gm glucose load irrespective of last meal (DIPSI criterion) were determined at 3 antenatal visits along with HbA1c and Hb level and categorized into diabetic and nondiabetic and anemic and non-anemic group. These patients were followed up till delivery to look for various maternal and neonatal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total 416 tests were done for hemoglobin and HbA1c in 193 women. Prevalence of GDM was 32.1%. Cutoff level of HbA1c was 4.8% in our study which also varied according to gestation. Mean HbA1c level found to be higher in anemic compared to non-anemic (4.5 vs. 3.96%) in nondiabetic women. Similar to that in women with GDM, mean HbA1c in anemic women (5.1) was higher compared to non-anemic (4.6) women.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study clearly shows that mean HbA1c varies across all trimesters; even though in diabetic women, mean HbA1c was higher as compared to nondiabetic, and it showed a statistically significant difference in the presence of anemia. HbA1c showed an inverse correlation with hemoglobin in women with or without GDM. Mean HbA1c level was higher among anemic women in both diabetic and nondiabetic group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India\",\"volume\":\"75 2\",\"pages\":\"160-165\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12064546/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-025-02108-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-025-02108-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

HbA1c是评价过去2-3个月高血糖状态的生化指标。根据美国糖尿病协会,HbA1c≥6.5%是糖尿病的诊断标准。最近的研究表明,贫血会改变HbA1c水平,但结果却相互矛盾。本研究旨在了解HbA1c与血红蛋白(Hb)在妊娠糖尿病(GDM)诊断中的作用,并了解在贫血患病率较高的国家,HbA1c是否可以作为诊断GDM的筛查方式。材料与方法:对193名孕妇进行观察性研究。结果:193名孕妇共进行了416项血红蛋白和糖化血红蛋白检测。GDM患病率为32.1%。在我们的研究中,HbA1c的临界值为4.8%,这一临界值也因妊娠而异。在非糖尿病女性中,贫血女性的平均HbA1c水平高于非贫血女性(4.5比3.96%)。与GDM女性相似,贫血女性的平均HbA1c(5.1)高于非贫血女性(4.6)。结论:这项研究清楚地表明,平均HbA1c在所有妊娠期都有所不同;即使在糖尿病女性中,平均HbA1c高于非糖尿病女性,并且在贫血的存在中显示出统计学上的显著差异。不论有无GDM, HbA1c均与血红蛋白呈负相关。糖尿病组和非糖尿病组贫血女性的平均HbA1c水平均较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Study of Correlation of HbA1c with Anemia in Pregnancy.

Introduction: HbA1c is a biochemical marker to evaluate hyperglycemia status in past 2-3 months. HbA1c ≥ 6.5% is diagnostic criteria for diabetes mellitus according to the American Diabetes Association. Recent studies suggest that anemia alters HbA1c levels, but results are conflicting. This study was planned to understand utility of HbA1c in relation to hemoglobin (Hb) for the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and also to understand if HbA1c can be used as a screening modality for diagnosis of GDM in countries with higher anemia prevalence.

Materials and methods: An observational study was conducted on 193 pregnant women of < 16-week gestation attending antenatal OPD of Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, KGMU, Lucknow, over a period of one year. Blood glucose levels 2 h after ingestion of 75 gm glucose load irrespective of last meal (DIPSI criterion) were determined at 3 antenatal visits along with HbA1c and Hb level and categorized into diabetic and nondiabetic and anemic and non-anemic group. These patients were followed up till delivery to look for various maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Results: A total 416 tests were done for hemoglobin and HbA1c in 193 women. Prevalence of GDM was 32.1%. Cutoff level of HbA1c was 4.8% in our study which also varied according to gestation. Mean HbA1c level found to be higher in anemic compared to non-anemic (4.5 vs. 3.96%) in nondiabetic women. Similar to that in women with GDM, mean HbA1c in anemic women (5.1) was higher compared to non-anemic (4.6) women.

Conclusion: This study clearly shows that mean HbA1c varies across all trimesters; even though in diabetic women, mean HbA1c was higher as compared to nondiabetic, and it showed a statistically significant difference in the presence of anemia. HbA1c showed an inverse correlation with hemoglobin in women with or without GDM. Mean HbA1c level was higher among anemic women in both diabetic and nondiabetic group.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
124
期刊介绍: Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India (JOGI) is the official journal of the Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology Societies of India (FOGSI). This is a peer- reviewed journal and features articles pertaining to the field of obstetrics and gynecology. The Journal is published six times a year on a bimonthly basis. Articles contributed by clinicians involved in patient care and research, and basic science researchers are considered. It publishes clinical and basic research of all aspects of obstetrics and gynecology, community obstetrics and family welfare and subspecialty subjects including gynecological endoscopy, infertility, oncology and ultrasonography, provided they have scientific merit and represent an important advance in knowledge. The journal believes in diversity and welcomes and encourages relevant contributions from world over. The types of articles published are: ·         Original Article·         Case Report ·         Instrumentation and Techniques ·         Short Commentary ·         Correspondence (Letter to the Editor) ·         Pictorial Essay
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信