评估18F氟雌二醇PET/CT图像病变检测的自动化工具以及评估转移性乳腺癌与标准护理成像的一致性

IF 5.6 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Renee Miller, Mark Battle, Kristen Wangerin, Daniel T Huff, Amy J Weisman, Song Chen, Timothy G Perk, Gary A Ulaner
{"title":"评估18F氟雌二醇PET/CT图像病变检测的自动化工具以及评估转移性乳腺癌与标准护理成像的一致性","authors":"Renee Miller, Mark Battle, Kristen Wangerin, Daniel T Huff, Amy J Weisman, Song Chen, Timothy G Perk, Gary A Ulaner","doi":"10.1148/rycan.240253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Purpose To evaluate two automated tools for detecting lesions on fluorine 18 (<sup>18</sup>F) fluoroestradiol (FES) PET/CT images and assess concordance of <sup>18</sup>F-FES PET/CT with standard diagnostic CT and/or <sup>18</sup>F fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT in patients with breast cancer. Materials and Methods This retrospective analysis of a prospective study included participants with breast cancer who underwent <sup>18</sup>F-FES PET/CT examinations (<i>n</i> = 52), <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT examinations (<i>n</i> = 13 of 52), and diagnostic CT examinations (<i>n</i> = 37 of 52). A convolutional neural network was trained for lesion detection using manually contoured lesions. Concordance in lesions labeled by a nuclear medicine physician between <sup>18</sup>F-FES and <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT and between <sup>18</sup>F-FES PET/CT and diagnostic CT was assessed using an automated software medical device. Lesion detection performance was evaluated using sensitivity and false positives per participant. Wilcoxon tests were used for statistical comparisons. Results The study included 52 participants. The lesion detection algorithm achieved a median sensitivity of 62% with 0 false positives per participant. Compared with sensitivity in overall lesion detection, the sensitivity was higher for detection of high-uptake lesions (maximum standardized uptake value > 1.5, <i>P</i> = .002) and similar for detection of large lesions (volume > 0.5 cm<sup>3</sup>, <i>P</i> = .15). The artificial intelligence (AI) lesion detection tool was combined with a standardized uptake value threshold to demonstrate a fully automated method of labeling patients as having FES-avid metastases. Additionally, automated concordance analysis showed that 17 of 25 participants (68%) had over half of the detected lesions across two modalities present on <sup>18</sup>F-FES PET/CT images. Conclusion An AI model was trained to detect lesions on <sup>18</sup>F-FES PET/CT images and an automated concordance tool measured heterogeneity between <sup>18</sup>F-FES PET/CT and standard-of-care imaging. <b>Keywords:</b> Molecular Imaging-Cancer, Neural Networks, PET/CT, Breast, Computer Applications-General (Informatics), Segmentation, <sup>18</sup>F-FES PET, Metastatic Breast Cancer, Lesion Detection, Artificial Intelligence, Lesion Matching <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> Clinical Trials Identifier: NCT04883814 Published under a CC BY 4.0 license.</p>","PeriodicalId":20786,"journal":{"name":"Radiology. Imaging cancer","volume":"7 3","pages":"e240253"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating Automated Tools for Lesion Detection on <sup>18</sup>F Fluoroestradiol PET/CT Images and Assessment of Concordance with Standard-of-Care Imaging in Metastatic Breast Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Renee Miller, Mark Battle, Kristen Wangerin, Daniel T Huff, Amy J Weisman, Song Chen, Timothy G Perk, Gary A Ulaner\",\"doi\":\"10.1148/rycan.240253\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Purpose To evaluate two automated tools for detecting lesions on fluorine 18 (<sup>18</sup>F) fluoroestradiol (FES) PET/CT images and assess concordance of <sup>18</sup>F-FES PET/CT with standard diagnostic CT and/or <sup>18</sup>F fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT in patients with breast cancer. Materials and Methods This retrospective analysis of a prospective study included participants with breast cancer who underwent <sup>18</sup>F-FES PET/CT examinations (<i>n</i> = 52), <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT examinations (<i>n</i> = 13 of 52), and diagnostic CT examinations (<i>n</i> = 37 of 52). A convolutional neural network was trained for lesion detection using manually contoured lesions. Concordance in lesions labeled by a nuclear medicine physician between <sup>18</sup>F-FES and <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT and between <sup>18</sup>F-FES PET/CT and diagnostic CT was assessed using an automated software medical device. Lesion detection performance was evaluated using sensitivity and false positives per participant. Wilcoxon tests were used for statistical comparisons. Results The study included 52 participants. The lesion detection algorithm achieved a median sensitivity of 62% with 0 false positives per participant. Compared with sensitivity in overall lesion detection, the sensitivity was higher for detection of high-uptake lesions (maximum standardized uptake value > 1.5, <i>P</i> = .002) and similar for detection of large lesions (volume > 0.5 cm<sup>3</sup>, <i>P</i> = .15). The artificial intelligence (AI) lesion detection tool was combined with a standardized uptake value threshold to demonstrate a fully automated method of labeling patients as having FES-avid metastases. Additionally, automated concordance analysis showed that 17 of 25 participants (68%) had over half of the detected lesions across two modalities present on <sup>18</sup>F-FES PET/CT images. Conclusion An AI model was trained to detect lesions on <sup>18</sup>F-FES PET/CT images and an automated concordance tool measured heterogeneity between <sup>18</sup>F-FES PET/CT and standard-of-care imaging. <b>Keywords:</b> Molecular Imaging-Cancer, Neural Networks, PET/CT, Breast, Computer Applications-General (Informatics), Segmentation, <sup>18</sup>F-FES PET, Metastatic Breast Cancer, Lesion Detection, Artificial Intelligence, Lesion Matching <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> Clinical Trials Identifier: NCT04883814 Published under a CC BY 4.0 license.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20786,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiology. Imaging cancer\",\"volume\":\"7 3\",\"pages\":\"e240253\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiology. Imaging cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1148/rycan.240253\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology. Imaging cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1148/rycan.240253","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评价两种用于检测氟18 (18F)氟雌二醇(FES) PET/CT图像病变的自动化工具,并评估18F-FES PET/CT与标准诊断CT和/或18F氟脱氧葡萄糖(FDG) PET/CT的一致性。材料和方法本前瞻性研究的回顾性分析纳入了接受18F-FES PET/CT检查(n = 52)、18F-FDG PET/CT检查(n = 13 / 52)和诊断性CT检查(n = 37 / 52)的乳腺癌患者。通过人工绘制病灶轮廓,训练卷积神经网络进行病灶检测。核医学医师标记的病变在18F-FES和18F-FDG PET/CT之间以及18F-FES PET/CT和诊断性CT之间的一致性使用自动化软件医疗设备进行评估。病变检测性能评估使用灵敏度和假阳性每个参与者。采用Wilcoxon检验进行统计比较。结果本研究共纳入52名受试者。病变检测算法的中位灵敏度为62%,每位参与者0个假阳性。与整体病变检测灵敏度相比,高摄取病变(最大标准化摄取值> 1.5,P = 0.002)检测灵敏度较高,大病变(体积> 0.5 cm3, P = 0.15)检测灵敏度相近。人工智能(AI)病变检测工具与标准化摄取值阈值相结合,展示了一种完全自动化的方法来标记患者是否患有FES-avid转移。此外,自动一致性分析显示,25名参与者中有17名(68%)在18F-FES PET/CT图像上两种模式下检测到的病变超过一半。人工智能模型可用于检测18F-FES PET/CT图像上的病变,自动一致性工具可测量18F-FES PET/CT与标准护理图像之间的异质性。关键词:分子成像-癌症,神经网络,PET/CT,乳腺,计算机应用-通用(信息学),分割,18F-FES PET,转移性乳腺癌,病变检测,人工智能,病变匹配临床试验标识符:NCT04883814在CC BY 4.0许可下发布。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating Automated Tools for Lesion Detection on 18F Fluoroestradiol PET/CT Images and Assessment of Concordance with Standard-of-Care Imaging in Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Purpose To evaluate two automated tools for detecting lesions on fluorine 18 (18F) fluoroestradiol (FES) PET/CT images and assess concordance of 18F-FES PET/CT with standard diagnostic CT and/or 18F fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT in patients with breast cancer. Materials and Methods This retrospective analysis of a prospective study included participants with breast cancer who underwent 18F-FES PET/CT examinations (n = 52), 18F-FDG PET/CT examinations (n = 13 of 52), and diagnostic CT examinations (n = 37 of 52). A convolutional neural network was trained for lesion detection using manually contoured lesions. Concordance in lesions labeled by a nuclear medicine physician between 18F-FES and 18F-FDG PET/CT and between 18F-FES PET/CT and diagnostic CT was assessed using an automated software medical device. Lesion detection performance was evaluated using sensitivity and false positives per participant. Wilcoxon tests were used for statistical comparisons. Results The study included 52 participants. The lesion detection algorithm achieved a median sensitivity of 62% with 0 false positives per participant. Compared with sensitivity in overall lesion detection, the sensitivity was higher for detection of high-uptake lesions (maximum standardized uptake value > 1.5, P = .002) and similar for detection of large lesions (volume > 0.5 cm3, P = .15). The artificial intelligence (AI) lesion detection tool was combined with a standardized uptake value threshold to demonstrate a fully automated method of labeling patients as having FES-avid metastases. Additionally, automated concordance analysis showed that 17 of 25 participants (68%) had over half of the detected lesions across two modalities present on 18F-FES PET/CT images. Conclusion An AI model was trained to detect lesions on 18F-FES PET/CT images and an automated concordance tool measured heterogeneity between 18F-FES PET/CT and standard-of-care imaging. Keywords: Molecular Imaging-Cancer, Neural Networks, PET/CT, Breast, Computer Applications-General (Informatics), Segmentation, 18F-FES PET, Metastatic Breast Cancer, Lesion Detection, Artificial Intelligence, Lesion Matching Supplemental material is available for this article. Clinical Trials Identifier: NCT04883814 Published under a CC BY 4.0 license.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
2.30%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信