使用人工智能生成急诊科出院摘要。

Chuting Tang, Nilupul Mudunna, Ian Turner, Mohammad Asghari-Jafarabadi, Keith Joe, Lisa Brichko
{"title":"使用人工智能生成急诊科出院摘要。","authors":"Chuting Tang, Nilupul Mudunna, Ian Turner, Mohammad Asghari-Jafarabadi, Keith Joe, Lisa Brichko","doi":"10.1071/AH24326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of utilising an artificial intelligence (AI) model to generate emergency department (ED) discharge summaries in an easily accessible format. Methods This single-centre, proof-of-concept trial was conducted at a tertiary metropolitan private hospital. It involved 142 randomly selected patients who attended in 2023 and were able to be discharged home after care by a single ED doctor. A total of 284 documents were randomised, consisting of 142 de-identified ED medical notes and 142 AI-generated discharge summaries created by ChatGPT4 based on the corresponding ED medical notes. Both document types were distributed to six senior ED doctors, each of whom graded them individually and independently using a predetermined tool that assessed 17 items in four domains (expected contents, readability, medical accuracy, and internal consistency). The primary outcome was the graded score for the AI-generated discharge summaries, compared with that of the original ED medical notes. Results Across the 17 items and four domains assessed, AI-generated discharge summaries rated comparably to ED medical notes in 12 items (including key information, reason for the ED visit, past medical history, allergies and medications, social history, history of presenting complaint, investigations, differential diagnoses list, grammar, formatting, appropriateness, and consistency) and three domains (expected contents, readability, and internal consistency). AI-generated discharge summaries demonstrated high mean scores in the remaining five items (examination findings, primary diagnosis, detailed plan, language clarity, and reflectiveness of treatment) and one domain (medical accuracy). Conclusions AI-generated discharge summaries are potentially comparable to ED medical notes in most key performance domains of a discharge summary.</p>","PeriodicalId":93891,"journal":{"name":"Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of artificial intelligence to generate emergency department discharge summaries.\",\"authors\":\"Chuting Tang, Nilupul Mudunna, Ian Turner, Mohammad Asghari-Jafarabadi, Keith Joe, Lisa Brichko\",\"doi\":\"10.1071/AH24326\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Objective This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of utilising an artificial intelligence (AI) model to generate emergency department (ED) discharge summaries in an easily accessible format. Methods This single-centre, proof-of-concept trial was conducted at a tertiary metropolitan private hospital. It involved 142 randomly selected patients who attended in 2023 and were able to be discharged home after care by a single ED doctor. A total of 284 documents were randomised, consisting of 142 de-identified ED medical notes and 142 AI-generated discharge summaries created by ChatGPT4 based on the corresponding ED medical notes. Both document types were distributed to six senior ED doctors, each of whom graded them individually and independently using a predetermined tool that assessed 17 items in four domains (expected contents, readability, medical accuracy, and internal consistency). The primary outcome was the graded score for the AI-generated discharge summaries, compared with that of the original ED medical notes. Results Across the 17 items and four domains assessed, AI-generated discharge summaries rated comparably to ED medical notes in 12 items (including key information, reason for the ED visit, past medical history, allergies and medications, social history, history of presenting complaint, investigations, differential diagnoses list, grammar, formatting, appropriateness, and consistency) and three domains (expected contents, readability, and internal consistency). AI-generated discharge summaries demonstrated high mean scores in the remaining five items (examination findings, primary diagnosis, detailed plan, language clarity, and reflectiveness of treatment) and one domain (medical accuracy). Conclusions AI-generated discharge summaries are potentially comparable to ED medical notes in most key performance domains of a discharge summary.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93891,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1071/AH24326\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/AH24326","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究旨在评估利用人工智能(AI)模型以易于获取的格式生成急诊科(ED)出院摘要的有效性。方法该单中心、概念验证试验在一家大城市三级私立医院进行。该研究涉及142名随机选择的患者,这些患者于2023年就诊,在一名急诊科医生的护理下能够出院回家。共随机抽取284份文件,包括142份去识别的急诊科医疗记录和142份由ChatGPT4根据相应的急诊科医疗记录创建的人工智能生成的出院摘要。这两种类型的文件被分发给六位高级急诊科医生,每位医生使用预先确定的工具单独独立地对文件进行评分,该工具评估了四个领域(预期内容、可读性、医疗准确性和内部一致性)的17个项目。主要结果是人工智能生成的出院摘要与原始急诊科医疗记录的分级得分。结果在评估的17个项目和4个领域中,人工智能生成的出院摘要在12个项目(包括关键信息、急诊科就诊原因、既往病史、过敏和药物、社会史、主诊史、调查、鉴别诊断清单、语法、格式、适当性和一致性)和3个领域(预期内容、可读性和内部一致性)的评分与急诊科医疗记录相当。人工智能生成的出院总结在其余五个项目(检查结果、初步诊断、详细计划、语言清晰度和治疗的反思性)和一个领域(医疗准确性)中显示出较高的平均得分。结论在出院摘要的大多数关键性能领域,ai生成的出院摘要与急诊科医疗记录具有潜在的可比性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Use of artificial intelligence to generate emergency department discharge summaries.

Objective This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of utilising an artificial intelligence (AI) model to generate emergency department (ED) discharge summaries in an easily accessible format. Methods This single-centre, proof-of-concept trial was conducted at a tertiary metropolitan private hospital. It involved 142 randomly selected patients who attended in 2023 and were able to be discharged home after care by a single ED doctor. A total of 284 documents were randomised, consisting of 142 de-identified ED medical notes and 142 AI-generated discharge summaries created by ChatGPT4 based on the corresponding ED medical notes. Both document types were distributed to six senior ED doctors, each of whom graded them individually and independently using a predetermined tool that assessed 17 items in four domains (expected contents, readability, medical accuracy, and internal consistency). The primary outcome was the graded score for the AI-generated discharge summaries, compared with that of the original ED medical notes. Results Across the 17 items and four domains assessed, AI-generated discharge summaries rated comparably to ED medical notes in 12 items (including key information, reason for the ED visit, past medical history, allergies and medications, social history, history of presenting complaint, investigations, differential diagnoses list, grammar, formatting, appropriateness, and consistency) and three domains (expected contents, readability, and internal consistency). AI-generated discharge summaries demonstrated high mean scores in the remaining five items (examination findings, primary diagnosis, detailed plan, language clarity, and reflectiveness of treatment) and one domain (medical accuracy). Conclusions AI-generated discharge summaries are potentially comparable to ED medical notes in most key performance domains of a discharge summary.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信