电子健康对医院的影响:系统评价的最新叙述性综述。

Mahmoud Abdelghani, Yi-Ting Yeh, Rebekah Eden, Leanna Woods, Graeme Mattison, Sophie Macklin, Oliver Canfell, Clair Sullivan
{"title":"电子健康对医院的影响:系统评价的最新叙述性综述。","authors":"Mahmoud Abdelghani, Yi-Ting Yeh, Rebekah Eden, Leanna Woods, Graeme Mattison, Sophie Macklin, Oliver Canfell, Clair Sullivan","doi":"10.1071/AH24321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective With the digital transformation of hospitals having unfolded globally, it is important to understand the impacts of eHealth on hospital practice. This study aims to update two previous narrative reviews of systematic reviews and assess: (1) what is the current state of eHealth impacts in hospitals? and (2) how have these impacts changed over time? Methods A narrative review of systematic reviews investigating the impact of eHealth (i.e. Electronic Medical Records (EMR), Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS), ePrescribing, and Computerised Provider Order Entry (CPOE)) published between 2 August 2017 and 31 December 2021 was conducted using PubMed and Medline. A meta-review was conducted to qualitatively compare the results of this review with two previous reviews, spanning from 2010 to 2021. Results Fourteen studies were included in the narrative review and 42 studies informed the meta-review. eHealth technologies were associated with a diverse array of outcomes with varying degrees of sentiment (positive, negative, neutral, mixed) reported between 2017 and 2021. In contrast to EMR, CDSS, and ePrescribing, the outcomes of CPOE were reported less frequently and less favourably although improvements to resource utilisation were evident. The meta-review identified mixed findings for the outcomes of CPOE, EMR, and ePrescribing and largely positive findings for CDSS. Conclusions The mixed impacts reported for EMR, CPOE, and ePrescribing and the largely positive impacts for CDSS should provide confidence to healthcare stakeholders of the potential of eHealth for hospitals. However, the presence of mixed and negative impacts demonstrate that realising the potential of eHealth is not guaranteed and dedicated efforts are needed to improve its outcomes. Future research should seek to identify the mechanisms that can be used to improve the impacts of eHealth.</p>","PeriodicalId":93891,"journal":{"name":"Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impacts of eHealth on hospitals: an updated narrative review of systematic reviews.\",\"authors\":\"Mahmoud Abdelghani, Yi-Ting Yeh, Rebekah Eden, Leanna Woods, Graeme Mattison, Sophie Macklin, Oliver Canfell, Clair Sullivan\",\"doi\":\"10.1071/AH24321\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Objective With the digital transformation of hospitals having unfolded globally, it is important to understand the impacts of eHealth on hospital practice. This study aims to update two previous narrative reviews of systematic reviews and assess: (1) what is the current state of eHealth impacts in hospitals? and (2) how have these impacts changed over time? Methods A narrative review of systematic reviews investigating the impact of eHealth (i.e. Electronic Medical Records (EMR), Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS), ePrescribing, and Computerised Provider Order Entry (CPOE)) published between 2 August 2017 and 31 December 2021 was conducted using PubMed and Medline. A meta-review was conducted to qualitatively compare the results of this review with two previous reviews, spanning from 2010 to 2021. Results Fourteen studies were included in the narrative review and 42 studies informed the meta-review. eHealth technologies were associated with a diverse array of outcomes with varying degrees of sentiment (positive, negative, neutral, mixed) reported between 2017 and 2021. In contrast to EMR, CDSS, and ePrescribing, the outcomes of CPOE were reported less frequently and less favourably although improvements to resource utilisation were evident. The meta-review identified mixed findings for the outcomes of CPOE, EMR, and ePrescribing and largely positive findings for CDSS. Conclusions The mixed impacts reported for EMR, CPOE, and ePrescribing and the largely positive impacts for CDSS should provide confidence to healthcare stakeholders of the potential of eHealth for hospitals. However, the presence of mixed and negative impacts demonstrate that realising the potential of eHealth is not guaranteed and dedicated efforts are needed to improve its outcomes. Future research should seek to identify the mechanisms that can be used to improve the impacts of eHealth.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93891,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1071/AH24321\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/AH24321","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着医院数字化转型在全球范围内展开,了解电子健康对医院实践的影响非常重要。本研究旨在更新之前的两篇系统综述的叙述性综述,并评估:(1)医院中电子健康影响的现状是什么?(2)这些影响是如何随时间变化的?方法使用PubMed和Medline对2017年8月2日至2021年12月31日期间发表的调查电子健康(即电子病历(EMR)、临床决策支持系统(CDSS)、电子处方和计算机化提供者订单输入(CPOE))影响的系统评价进行叙述性回顾。进行了一项荟萃综述,将本综述的结果与2010年至2021年期间的两项综述进行了定性比较。结果14项研究被纳入叙述性综述,42项研究被纳入元综述。在2017年至2021年期间,电子健康技术与不同程度的情绪(积极、消极、中性、混合)的各种结果相关联。与EMR、CDSS和电子处方相比,尽管在资源利用方面有明显改善,但CPOE的结果报告频率较低,也不太有利。荟萃评价确定了CPOE、EMR和电子处方的结果好坏参半,而CDSS的结果大多是积极的。结论EMR、CPOE和电子处方的混合影响以及CDSS的主要积极影响应使医疗保健利益相关者对医院电子健康的潜力充满信心。然而,混合和负面影响的存在表明,实现电子健康的潜力是不保证的,需要专门的努力来改善其结果。未来的研究应寻求确定可用于改善电子健康影响的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impacts of eHealth on hospitals: an updated narrative review of systematic reviews.

Objective With the digital transformation of hospitals having unfolded globally, it is important to understand the impacts of eHealth on hospital practice. This study aims to update two previous narrative reviews of systematic reviews and assess: (1) what is the current state of eHealth impacts in hospitals? and (2) how have these impacts changed over time? Methods A narrative review of systematic reviews investigating the impact of eHealth (i.e. Electronic Medical Records (EMR), Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS), ePrescribing, and Computerised Provider Order Entry (CPOE)) published between 2 August 2017 and 31 December 2021 was conducted using PubMed and Medline. A meta-review was conducted to qualitatively compare the results of this review with two previous reviews, spanning from 2010 to 2021. Results Fourteen studies were included in the narrative review and 42 studies informed the meta-review. eHealth technologies were associated with a diverse array of outcomes with varying degrees of sentiment (positive, negative, neutral, mixed) reported between 2017 and 2021. In contrast to EMR, CDSS, and ePrescribing, the outcomes of CPOE were reported less frequently and less favourably although improvements to resource utilisation were evident. The meta-review identified mixed findings for the outcomes of CPOE, EMR, and ePrescribing and largely positive findings for CDSS. Conclusions The mixed impacts reported for EMR, CPOE, and ePrescribing and the largely positive impacts for CDSS should provide confidence to healthcare stakeholders of the potential of eHealth for hospitals. However, the presence of mixed and negative impacts demonstrate that realising the potential of eHealth is not guaranteed and dedicated efforts are needed to improve its outcomes. Future research should seek to identify the mechanisms that can be used to improve the impacts of eHealth.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信