加强麻醉学:住院医师课程的多样性、公平性和包容性调查。

Grace Huang, Chris Wang, Tiffany Rosenzweig, Rachel Moquin, Scott Markowitz, Enyo Ablordeppey
{"title":"加强麻醉学:住院医师课程的多样性、公平性和包容性调查。","authors":"Grace Huang, Chris Wang, Tiffany Rosenzweig, Rachel Moquin, Scott Markowitz, Enyo Ablordeppey","doi":"10.46374/VolXXVII_Issue1_Ablordeppey","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite national recognition of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) training in graduate medical education, the current landscape of DEI curricula across anesthesiology residencies is poorly understood. We surveyed anesthesiology residency programs to evaluate how DEI education is implemented and assessed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional survey of all 164 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited anesthesiology residency programs. The survey was developed, and data were collected using the Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) tool. Program characteristics and departmental attitudes toward DEI were collected on a 5-point Likert scale. Univariate and bivariate analysis models were used to generate a descriptive report of responses. Content analysis was used to identify additional themes from open-ended responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-three (32%) program directors responded to the survey. As their primary practice setting, 71.7% of programs were university-based, 18.9% community-based university- associated, and 9.4% community-based programs. A DEI curriculum was reported in 64.2% of programs with the median year of implementation in 2020 and the median hours spent per academic year on DEI content was 2.0 to 3.5 (range, 1-20). Of programs without a DEI curriculum, 68.4% indicated interest in implementing one. Of those with a DEI curriculum, common learning activities were case-based discussion, web-based learning, classroom learning, and simulations. The most common barriers to implementation included educational expertise, time for residents, and time for faculty. Only 11.5% (n = 3) of programs assessed outcomes from their curricula, most using pre-post surveys.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study found that the presence of a DEI curriculum in anesthesiology residencies is relatively new, heterogeneous, and nonstandardized, and that outcomes are rarely measured.</p>","PeriodicalId":75067,"journal":{"name":"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM","volume":"27 1","pages":"E736"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11978220/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing Anesthesiology: A Survey of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Residency Curricula.\",\"authors\":\"Grace Huang, Chris Wang, Tiffany Rosenzweig, Rachel Moquin, Scott Markowitz, Enyo Ablordeppey\",\"doi\":\"10.46374/VolXXVII_Issue1_Ablordeppey\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite national recognition of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) training in graduate medical education, the current landscape of DEI curricula across anesthesiology residencies is poorly understood. We surveyed anesthesiology residency programs to evaluate how DEI education is implemented and assessed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional survey of all 164 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited anesthesiology residency programs. The survey was developed, and data were collected using the Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) tool. Program characteristics and departmental attitudes toward DEI were collected on a 5-point Likert scale. Univariate and bivariate analysis models were used to generate a descriptive report of responses. Content analysis was used to identify additional themes from open-ended responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-three (32%) program directors responded to the survey. As their primary practice setting, 71.7% of programs were university-based, 18.9% community-based university- associated, and 9.4% community-based programs. A DEI curriculum was reported in 64.2% of programs with the median year of implementation in 2020 and the median hours spent per academic year on DEI content was 2.0 to 3.5 (range, 1-20). Of programs without a DEI curriculum, 68.4% indicated interest in implementing one. Of those with a DEI curriculum, common learning activities were case-based discussion, web-based learning, classroom learning, and simulations. The most common barriers to implementation included educational expertise, time for residents, and time for faculty. Only 11.5% (n = 3) of programs assessed outcomes from their curricula, most using pre-post surveys.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study found that the presence of a DEI curriculum in anesthesiology residencies is relatively new, heterogeneous, and nonstandardized, and that outcomes are rarely measured.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"E736\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11978220/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46374/VolXXVII_Issue1_Ablordeppey\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46374/VolXXVII_Issue1_Ablordeppey","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管国家承认研究生医学教育中的多样性、公平性和包容性(DEI)培训,但麻醉学住院医师的DEI课程现状尚不清楚。我们调查了麻醉住院医师项目,以评估DEI教育是如何实施和评估的。方法:我们对所有164个研究生医学教育认证委员会认可的麻醉学住院医师项目进行了横断面调查。该调查是通过研究电子数据捕获(REDCap)工具开发和收集的。以5分李克特量表收集项目特征和部门对DEI的态度。单变量和双变量分析模型用于生成描述性报告。内容分析用于从开放式回答中确定其他主题。结果:53位(32%)项目主管回应了调查。71.7%的项目以大学为基础,18.9%的项目以社区大学为基础,9.4%的项目以社区为基础。据报告,64.2%的项目在2020年实施DEI课程,每学年在DEI内容上花费的中位数时间为2.0至3.5小时(范围1-20)。在没有DEI课程的项目中,68.4%表示有兴趣实施DEI课程。在那些使用DEI课程的学生中,常见的学习活动是基于案例的讨论、基于网络的学习、课堂学习和模拟。最常见的实施障碍包括教育专业知识、住院医生的时间和教师的时间。只有11.5% (n = 3)的项目评估了其课程的结果,大多数项目使用的是前后调查。结论:本研究发现,麻醉住院医师中DEI课程的存在相对较新,异质性和非标准化,其结果很少被测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhancing Anesthesiology: A Survey of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Residency Curricula.

Background: Despite national recognition of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) training in graduate medical education, the current landscape of DEI curricula across anesthesiology residencies is poorly understood. We surveyed anesthesiology residency programs to evaluate how DEI education is implemented and assessed.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of all 164 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited anesthesiology residency programs. The survey was developed, and data were collected using the Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap) tool. Program characteristics and departmental attitudes toward DEI were collected on a 5-point Likert scale. Univariate and bivariate analysis models were used to generate a descriptive report of responses. Content analysis was used to identify additional themes from open-ended responses.

Results: Fifty-three (32%) program directors responded to the survey. As their primary practice setting, 71.7% of programs were university-based, 18.9% community-based university- associated, and 9.4% community-based programs. A DEI curriculum was reported in 64.2% of programs with the median year of implementation in 2020 and the median hours spent per academic year on DEI content was 2.0 to 3.5 (range, 1-20). Of programs without a DEI curriculum, 68.4% indicated interest in implementing one. Of those with a DEI curriculum, common learning activities were case-based discussion, web-based learning, classroom learning, and simulations. The most common barriers to implementation included educational expertise, time for residents, and time for faculty. Only 11.5% (n = 3) of programs assessed outcomes from their curricula, most using pre-post surveys.

Conclusions: This study found that the presence of a DEI curriculum in anesthesiology residencies is relatively new, heterogeneous, and nonstandardized, and that outcomes are rarely measured.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信