辅助技术对中风患者挛缩的治疗有效吗?- Cochrane综述摘要及评论。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
NeuroRehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-03 DOI:10.1177/10538135251323968
Alex Todhunter-Brown
{"title":"辅助技术对中风患者挛缩的治疗有效吗?- Cochrane综述摘要及评论。","authors":"Alex Todhunter-Brown","doi":"10.1177/10538135251323968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundPatients who have had a stroke are at risk of contractures, a shortening of muscles and other soft tissues. Muscle stretching, manually or delivered by other means, is a common strategy to manage contractures following stroke. A Cochrane Review by Mohammed Meeran et al. has investigated the effectiveness of assistive technology defined as a mechanical, electrical, or electromechanical device used to stretch or lengthen a muscle statically, dynamically, or cyclically for preventing or reducing contractures.ObjectiveTo summarize the Cochrane Review by Mohammed Meeran et al. and comment on it from a rehabilitation perspective.MethodsThe Cochrane Review authors identified randomised controlled studies (RCTs) which investigated the use of electrical, mechanical, or electromechanical devices to manage contractures in adults with stroke. RCTs had to compare these assistive technologies with no treatment, routine therapy, or another assistive technology. Passive range of motion (PROM) was the primary outcome.ResultsSeven studies (294 participants) were included. Data from five studies (252 participants) comparing assistive technologies with routine care were meta-analyzed. The evidence was very uncertain about the effect of assistive technology on PROM, adverse events and other outcomes.ConclusionsThere is insufficient evidence to support clinical decisions about the effectiveness of assistive technology in the management of contractures in people with stroke. Rehabilitation professionals should select strategies for management of contractures in patients with stroke based on an expert assessment of a patient's individual needs and preferences, and ensure regular re-assessment. High quality research is necessary in this field.</p>","PeriodicalId":19717,"journal":{"name":"NeuroRehabilitation","volume":"56 3","pages":"418-420"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12231834/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are Assistive Technologies Effective in the Management of Contractures in People with Stroke? - A Cochrane Review Summary with Commentary.\",\"authors\":\"Alex Todhunter-Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10538135251323968\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundPatients who have had a stroke are at risk of contractures, a shortening of muscles and other soft tissues. Muscle stretching, manually or delivered by other means, is a common strategy to manage contractures following stroke. A Cochrane Review by Mohammed Meeran et al. has investigated the effectiveness of assistive technology defined as a mechanical, electrical, or electromechanical device used to stretch or lengthen a muscle statically, dynamically, or cyclically for preventing or reducing contractures.ObjectiveTo summarize the Cochrane Review by Mohammed Meeran et al. and comment on it from a rehabilitation perspective.MethodsThe Cochrane Review authors identified randomised controlled studies (RCTs) which investigated the use of electrical, mechanical, or electromechanical devices to manage contractures in adults with stroke. RCTs had to compare these assistive technologies with no treatment, routine therapy, or another assistive technology. Passive range of motion (PROM) was the primary outcome.ResultsSeven studies (294 participants) were included. Data from five studies (252 participants) comparing assistive technologies with routine care were meta-analyzed. The evidence was very uncertain about the effect of assistive technology on PROM, adverse events and other outcomes.ConclusionsThere is insufficient evidence to support clinical decisions about the effectiveness of assistive technology in the management of contractures in people with stroke. Rehabilitation professionals should select strategies for management of contractures in patients with stroke based on an expert assessment of a patient's individual needs and preferences, and ensure regular re-assessment. High quality research is necessary in this field.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NeuroRehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"56 3\",\"pages\":\"418-420\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12231834/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NeuroRehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538135251323968\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NeuroRehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538135251323968","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

中风患者有挛缩、肌肉和其他软组织缩短的风险。肌肉伸展,手动或通过其他方式,是一种常见的策略来管理收缩中风后。Mohammed Meeran等人的Cochrane综述研究了辅助技术的有效性,辅助技术被定义为一种机械、电子或机电设备,用于静态、动态或周期性地拉伸或延长肌肉,以预防或减少挛缩。目的总结Mohammed Meeran等人的Cochrane综述,并从康复学角度对其进行评价。方法:Cochrane综述的作者确定了随机对照研究(RCTs),这些研究调查了使用电气、机械或机电设备来管理成年中风患者的挛缩。随机对照试验必须将这些辅助技术与不治疗、常规治疗或其他辅助技术进行比较。被动式活动度(PROM)是主要结果。结果纳入7项研究(294名受试者)。来自5项研究(252名参与者)的比较辅助技术与常规护理的数据进行meta分析。证据非常不确定辅助技术对PROM、不良事件和其他结果的影响。结论辅助技术在脑卒中患者挛缩治疗中的有效性尚无足够的证据支持临床决策。康复专业人员应根据对患者个人需求和偏好的专家评估来选择治疗脑卒中患者挛缩的策略,并确保定期重新评估。在这个领域进行高质量的研究是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Are Assistive Technologies Effective in the Management of Contractures in People with Stroke? - A Cochrane Review Summary with Commentary.

BackgroundPatients who have had a stroke are at risk of contractures, a shortening of muscles and other soft tissues. Muscle stretching, manually or delivered by other means, is a common strategy to manage contractures following stroke. A Cochrane Review by Mohammed Meeran et al. has investigated the effectiveness of assistive technology defined as a mechanical, electrical, or electromechanical device used to stretch or lengthen a muscle statically, dynamically, or cyclically for preventing or reducing contractures.ObjectiveTo summarize the Cochrane Review by Mohammed Meeran et al. and comment on it from a rehabilitation perspective.MethodsThe Cochrane Review authors identified randomised controlled studies (RCTs) which investigated the use of electrical, mechanical, or electromechanical devices to manage contractures in adults with stroke. RCTs had to compare these assistive technologies with no treatment, routine therapy, or another assistive technology. Passive range of motion (PROM) was the primary outcome.ResultsSeven studies (294 participants) were included. Data from five studies (252 participants) comparing assistive technologies with routine care were meta-analyzed. The evidence was very uncertain about the effect of assistive technology on PROM, adverse events and other outcomes.ConclusionsThere is insufficient evidence to support clinical decisions about the effectiveness of assistive technology in the management of contractures in people with stroke. Rehabilitation professionals should select strategies for management of contractures in patients with stroke based on an expert assessment of a patient's individual needs and preferences, and ensure regular re-assessment. High quality research is necessary in this field.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
NeuroRehabilitation
NeuroRehabilitation CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: NeuroRehabilitation, an international, interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal, publishes manuscripts focused on scientifically based, practical information relevant to all aspects of neurologic rehabilitation. We publish unsolicited papers detailing original work/research that covers the full life span and range of neurological disabilities including stroke, spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury, neuromuscular disease and other neurological disorders. We also publish thematically organized issues that focus on specific clinical disorders, types of therapy and age groups. Proposals for thematic issues and suggestions for issue editors are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信