微创骨手术深度对犬牙内伸率和牙根吸收的影响:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。

Q1 Dentistry
Potjanakorn Inpanya, Pannapat Chanmanee, Supontep Teerakanok
{"title":"微创骨手术深度对犬牙内伸率和牙根吸收的影响:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Potjanakorn Inpanya, Pannapat Chanmanee, Supontep Teerakanok","doi":"10.1055/s-0045-1806932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare canine retraction rates and the amounts of root resorption in different depths of micro-osteoperforations (MOPs) during canine retraction in orthodontic patients. Relevant literature was sought using a prespecified search strategy until May 2024. Electronic medical and scientific databases included PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane's Library (clinical trials). The review protocol was registered in Prospero (CRD42024555722). The data were analyzed in terms of mean difference for comparison using a random-effect meta-analysis. A total of 14 randomized controlled trial studies were included. According to the findings of the meta-analysis on MOPs and their impact on the mean rate of canine movement, the MOP groups showed a significantly higher rate compared with the control groups (weighted mean difference = 0.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24-0.40; <i>p</i> = 0.00 and weighted mean difference = 0.20; 95% CI, 0.01-0.40; <i>p</i> = 0.04) at depths of 2 to 4 and 5 to 7 mm, respectively. Three studies reported no differences in root resorption between the MOP groups and the control groups. Both MOP depths, that is, 2 to 4 and 5 to 7 mm, accelerated canine retraction more than the controls by approximately 0.32 and 0.20 mm/month, respectively. However, both MOP depths presented root resorption during canine retraction that was not different from the controls.</p>","PeriodicalId":12028,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Micro-Osteoperforation Depths on Canine Retraction Rate and Root Resorption: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Potjanakorn Inpanya, Pannapat Chanmanee, Supontep Teerakanok\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0045-1806932\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare canine retraction rates and the amounts of root resorption in different depths of micro-osteoperforations (MOPs) during canine retraction in orthodontic patients. Relevant literature was sought using a prespecified search strategy until May 2024. Electronic medical and scientific databases included PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane's Library (clinical trials). The review protocol was registered in Prospero (CRD42024555722). The data were analyzed in terms of mean difference for comparison using a random-effect meta-analysis. A total of 14 randomized controlled trial studies were included. According to the findings of the meta-analysis on MOPs and their impact on the mean rate of canine movement, the MOP groups showed a significantly higher rate compared with the control groups (weighted mean difference = 0.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24-0.40; <i>p</i> = 0.00 and weighted mean difference = 0.20; 95% CI, 0.01-0.40; <i>p</i> = 0.04) at depths of 2 to 4 and 5 to 7 mm, respectively. Three studies reported no differences in root resorption between the MOP groups and the control groups. Both MOP depths, that is, 2 to 4 and 5 to 7 mm, accelerated canine retraction more than the controls by approximately 0.32 and 0.20 mm/month, respectively. However, both MOP depths presented root resorption during canine retraction that was not different from the controls.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Dentistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0045-1806932\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0045-1806932","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在比较正畸患者在不同深度的微骨手术(MOPs)中犬侧伸率和根吸收量。在2024年5月之前,使用预先指定的搜索策略查找相关文献。电子医学和科学数据库包括PubMed/MEDLINE、Scopus、EMBASE、Web of Science和Cochrane’s Library(临床试验)。审查方案已在Prospero注册(CRD42024555722)。采用随机效应荟萃分析对数据进行平均差异分析。共纳入14项随机对照试验研究。根据MOPs及其对犬平均运动率影响的meta分析结果,与对照组相比,MOP组的平均运动率显著高于对照组(加权平均差异= 0.32;95%置信区间[CI], 0.24-0.40;P = 0.00,加权平均差= 0.20;95% ci, 0.01-0.40;P = 0.04),深度分别为2 ~ 4 mm和5 ~ 7 mm。3项研究报告MOP组与对照组在牙根吸收方面无差异。两个MOP深度,即2至4 mm和5至7 mm,比对照组分别加速了约0.32和0.20 mm/月的犬齿缩回。然而,两种MOP深度在犬齿内收时都表现出根吸收,与对照组没有什么不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of Micro-Osteoperforation Depths on Canine Retraction Rate and Root Resorption: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare canine retraction rates and the amounts of root resorption in different depths of micro-osteoperforations (MOPs) during canine retraction in orthodontic patients. Relevant literature was sought using a prespecified search strategy until May 2024. Electronic medical and scientific databases included PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane's Library (clinical trials). The review protocol was registered in Prospero (CRD42024555722). The data were analyzed in terms of mean difference for comparison using a random-effect meta-analysis. A total of 14 randomized controlled trial studies were included. According to the findings of the meta-analysis on MOPs and their impact on the mean rate of canine movement, the MOP groups showed a significantly higher rate compared with the control groups (weighted mean difference = 0.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24-0.40; p = 0.00 and weighted mean difference = 0.20; 95% CI, 0.01-0.40; p = 0.04) at depths of 2 to 4 and 5 to 7 mm, respectively. Three studies reported no differences in root resorption between the MOP groups and the control groups. Both MOP depths, that is, 2 to 4 and 5 to 7 mm, accelerated canine retraction more than the controls by approximately 0.32 and 0.20 mm/month, respectively. However, both MOP depths presented root resorption during canine retraction that was not different from the controls.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Dentistry
European Journal of Dentistry Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
161
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Dentistry is the official journal of the Dental Investigations Society, based in Turkey. It is a double-blinded peer-reviewed, Open Access, multi-disciplinary international journal addressing various aspects of dentistry. The journal''s board consists of eminent investigators in dentistry from across the globe and presents an ideal international composition. The journal encourages its authors to submit original investigations, reviews, and reports addressing various divisions of dentistry including oral pathology, prosthodontics, endodontics, orthodontics etc. It is available both online and in print.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信