利用失效模式与效应分析(FMEA)探讨患者安全培养与不良医疗事件的相关性。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Pub Date : 2025-04-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/RMHP.S502725
Yang Cui, Yu Wang, He Liu, Shaojie Xu, Xue Zhang
{"title":"利用失效模式与效应分析(FMEA)探讨患者安全培养与不良医疗事件的相关性。","authors":"Yang Cui, Yu Wang, He Liu, Shaojie Xu, Xue Zhang","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S502725","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to explore the correlation between medical safety adverse events and patient safety culture through the lens of Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty patients from a hospital were selected as the research subjects, alongside 440 medical staff members (including clinical, medical technology, and management personnel) who participated in the study. The general demographic characteristics of medical staff, patient safety culture, and adverse medical safety events were investigated. FMEA was employed to analyze the relationship between medical safety adverse events and patient safety culture, using the risk priority number (RPN) as a key metric.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A comparison of RPN values before and after FMEA intervention revealed that the RPN values of each failure mode significantly decreased post-intervention. Correlation analysis showed significant relationships between medication errors and several factors: \"incident reporting frequency\" (OR=0.706), \"manager expectations and actions to promote patient safety\" (OR=0.733), and \"management support for patient safety\" (OR=0.755). Pressure ulcers were significantly correlated with \"manager expectations and actions to promote patient safety\" (OR=0.729) and \"shift and transfer\" (OR=0.707). Falls were notably associated with \"interdepartmental cooperation\" (OR=0.735), \"feedback and communication about errors\" (OR=0.756), and \"shift and transfer\" (OR=0.660). Additionally, a strong correlation was identified between adverse events and \"management support for patient safety\" (OR=0.701).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Utilizing FMEA to analyze the correlation between medical safety adverse events and patient safety culture is effective in identifying specific dimensions of these events related to safety culture. This enables the development of targeted interventions to mitigate adverse events and enhance patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"18 ","pages":"1367-1376"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12013626/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the Correlation Between Patient Safety Culture and Adverse Medical Events Using Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA).\",\"authors\":\"Yang Cui, Yu Wang, He Liu, Shaojie Xu, Xue Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/RMHP.S502725\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to explore the correlation between medical safety adverse events and patient safety culture through the lens of Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty patients from a hospital were selected as the research subjects, alongside 440 medical staff members (including clinical, medical technology, and management personnel) who participated in the study. The general demographic characteristics of medical staff, patient safety culture, and adverse medical safety events were investigated. FMEA was employed to analyze the relationship between medical safety adverse events and patient safety culture, using the risk priority number (RPN) as a key metric.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A comparison of RPN values before and after FMEA intervention revealed that the RPN values of each failure mode significantly decreased post-intervention. Correlation analysis showed significant relationships between medication errors and several factors: \\\"incident reporting frequency\\\" (OR=0.706), \\\"manager expectations and actions to promote patient safety\\\" (OR=0.733), and \\\"management support for patient safety\\\" (OR=0.755). Pressure ulcers were significantly correlated with \\\"manager expectations and actions to promote patient safety\\\" (OR=0.729) and \\\"shift and transfer\\\" (OR=0.707). Falls were notably associated with \\\"interdepartmental cooperation\\\" (OR=0.735), \\\"feedback and communication about errors\\\" (OR=0.756), and \\\"shift and transfer\\\" (OR=0.660). Additionally, a strong correlation was identified between adverse events and \\\"management support for patient safety\\\" (OR=0.701).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Utilizing FMEA to analyze the correlation between medical safety adverse events and patient safety culture is effective in identifying specific dimensions of these events related to safety culture. This enables the development of targeted interventions to mitigate adverse events and enhance patient safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"1367-1376\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12013626/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S502725\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S502725","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在通过失效模式与效应分析(Failure Mode and Effect Analysis, FMEA)的视角,探讨医疗安全不良事件与患者安全文化的相关性。方法:选取某医院60例患者作为研究对象,440名医务人员(包括临床、医疗技术和管理人员)参与研究。调查了医务人员的一般人口学特征、患者安全文化和不良医疗安全事件。采用FMEA分析医疗安全不良事件与患者安全文化之间的关系,以风险优先级数(RPN)为关键指标。结果:FMEA干预前后的RPN值比较发现,干预后各失效模式的RPN值均显著降低。相关分析显示,用药差错与“事件报告频率”(OR=0.706)、“管理者促进患者安全的期望和行动”(OR=0.733)和“管理层对患者安全的支持”(OR=0.755)存在显著相关。压疮与“管理者期望和促进患者安全的行动”(OR=0.729)和“换班和转移”(OR=0.707)显著相关。跌倒与“部门间合作”(OR=0.735)、“关于错误的反馈和沟通”(OR=0.756)和“转移和转移”(OR=0.660)显著相关。此外,不良事件与“对患者安全的管理支持”之间存在很强的相关性(OR=0.701)。结论:利用FMEA分析医疗安全不良事件与患者安全文化的相关性,可以有效地确定这些事件与安全文化相关的具体维度。这有助于制定有针对性的干预措施,以减轻不良事件并提高患者安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the Correlation Between Patient Safety Culture and Adverse Medical Events Using Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA).

Objective: This study aimed to explore the correlation between medical safety adverse events and patient safety culture through the lens of Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA).

Methods: Sixty patients from a hospital were selected as the research subjects, alongside 440 medical staff members (including clinical, medical technology, and management personnel) who participated in the study. The general demographic characteristics of medical staff, patient safety culture, and adverse medical safety events were investigated. FMEA was employed to analyze the relationship between medical safety adverse events and patient safety culture, using the risk priority number (RPN) as a key metric.

Results: A comparison of RPN values before and after FMEA intervention revealed that the RPN values of each failure mode significantly decreased post-intervention. Correlation analysis showed significant relationships between medication errors and several factors: "incident reporting frequency" (OR=0.706), "manager expectations and actions to promote patient safety" (OR=0.733), and "management support for patient safety" (OR=0.755). Pressure ulcers were significantly correlated with "manager expectations and actions to promote patient safety" (OR=0.729) and "shift and transfer" (OR=0.707). Falls were notably associated with "interdepartmental cooperation" (OR=0.735), "feedback and communication about errors" (OR=0.756), and "shift and transfer" (OR=0.660). Additionally, a strong correlation was identified between adverse events and "management support for patient safety" (OR=0.701).

Conclusion: Utilizing FMEA to analyze the correlation between medical safety adverse events and patient safety culture is effective in identifying specific dimensions of these events related to safety culture. This enables the development of targeted interventions to mitigate adverse events and enhance patient safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
242
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Public and community health Policy and law Preventative and predictive healthcare Risk and hazard management Epidemiology, detection and screening Lifestyle and diet modification Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs Health and safety and occupational health Healthcare services provision Health literacy and education Advertising and promotion of health issues Health economic evaluations and resource management Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信