Naoko Shigeta, Shuji Murakami, Kouji Yamamoto, Tomoyuki Yokose, Tetsuya Isaka, Kota Washimi, Yohei Miyagi, Haruhiro Saito, Hiroyuki Ito, Aya Saito
{"title":"非小细胞肺癌术前经支气管肺活检与切除标本中程序性死亡配体-1表达的比较","authors":"Naoko Shigeta, Shuji Murakami, Kouji Yamamoto, Tomoyuki Yokose, Tetsuya Isaka, Kota Washimi, Yohei Miyagi, Haruhiro Saito, Hiroyuki Ito, Aya Saito","doi":"10.1007/s00432-025-06189-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Programmed death-ligand 1 expression is heterogeneous in non-small cell lung cancer, and small specimens may not accurately represent the entire tumor. The current study investigated the discordance in programmed death-ligand 1 expression between preoperative biopsy samples and resected specimens.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively collected data of patients with non-small cell lung cancer who underwent surgical resection from May 2022 to June 2024. The programmed death-ligand 1-positive tumor proportion score was evaluated for each case.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 118 patients were included in this study. Programmed death-ligand 1 expression was discordant between the biopsy and resected specimens in 34 cases (28.8%), and it was underestimated in 25 (21.2%) biopsy specimens. The concordance according to Cohen's kappa was κ = 0.410 (95% confidence interval: 0.243-0.577). The number of discordant cases decreased as the number of tumor cells in biopsy specimens increased. In the group with > 400 tumor cells, agreement rate was 100%. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator model identified never smoker, small tumor size, clinical stage II-IV and ≤ 200 tumor cells in biopsy specimens as predictors of underestimation. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve using those four factors was 0.773 (0.663-0.884).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Programmed death-ligand 1 expression in biopsy and resected specimens is often discordant, often being underestimated in biopsy specimens. Discordance is more likely when tumor cell counts are low in the biopsy samples. Therefore, caution is advised when treatment decisions are made based on programmed death-ligand 1 assessments of small specimens.</p>","PeriodicalId":15118,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology","volume":"151 4","pages":"139"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11996979/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of programmed death ligand-1 expression in preoperative transbronchial lung biopsy and resected specimens in non-small cell lung cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Naoko Shigeta, Shuji Murakami, Kouji Yamamoto, Tomoyuki Yokose, Tetsuya Isaka, Kota Washimi, Yohei Miyagi, Haruhiro Saito, Hiroyuki Ito, Aya Saito\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00432-025-06189-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Programmed death-ligand 1 expression is heterogeneous in non-small cell lung cancer, and small specimens may not accurately represent the entire tumor. The current study investigated the discordance in programmed death-ligand 1 expression between preoperative biopsy samples and resected specimens.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively collected data of patients with non-small cell lung cancer who underwent surgical resection from May 2022 to June 2024. The programmed death-ligand 1-positive tumor proportion score was evaluated for each case.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 118 patients were included in this study. Programmed death-ligand 1 expression was discordant between the biopsy and resected specimens in 34 cases (28.8%), and it was underestimated in 25 (21.2%) biopsy specimens. The concordance according to Cohen's kappa was κ = 0.410 (95% confidence interval: 0.243-0.577). The number of discordant cases decreased as the number of tumor cells in biopsy specimens increased. In the group with > 400 tumor cells, agreement rate was 100%. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator model identified never smoker, small tumor size, clinical stage II-IV and ≤ 200 tumor cells in biopsy specimens as predictors of underestimation. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve using those four factors was 0.773 (0.663-0.884).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Programmed death-ligand 1 expression in biopsy and resected specimens is often discordant, often being underestimated in biopsy specimens. Discordance is more likely when tumor cell counts are low in the biopsy samples. Therefore, caution is advised when treatment decisions are made based on programmed death-ligand 1 assessments of small specimens.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology\",\"volume\":\"151 4\",\"pages\":\"139\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11996979/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-025-06189-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-025-06189-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of programmed death ligand-1 expression in preoperative transbronchial lung biopsy and resected specimens in non-small cell lung cancer.
Purpose: Programmed death-ligand 1 expression is heterogeneous in non-small cell lung cancer, and small specimens may not accurately represent the entire tumor. The current study investigated the discordance in programmed death-ligand 1 expression between preoperative biopsy samples and resected specimens.
Methods: We retrospectively collected data of patients with non-small cell lung cancer who underwent surgical resection from May 2022 to June 2024. The programmed death-ligand 1-positive tumor proportion score was evaluated for each case.
Results: In total, 118 patients were included in this study. Programmed death-ligand 1 expression was discordant between the biopsy and resected specimens in 34 cases (28.8%), and it was underestimated in 25 (21.2%) biopsy specimens. The concordance according to Cohen's kappa was κ = 0.410 (95% confidence interval: 0.243-0.577). The number of discordant cases decreased as the number of tumor cells in biopsy specimens increased. In the group with > 400 tumor cells, agreement rate was 100%. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator model identified never smoker, small tumor size, clinical stage II-IV and ≤ 200 tumor cells in biopsy specimens as predictors of underestimation. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve using those four factors was 0.773 (0.663-0.884).
Conclusions: Programmed death-ligand 1 expression in biopsy and resected specimens is often discordant, often being underestimated in biopsy specimens. Discordance is more likely when tumor cell counts are low in the biopsy samples. Therefore, caution is advised when treatment decisions are made based on programmed death-ligand 1 assessments of small specimens.
期刊介绍:
The "Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology" publishes significant and up-to-date articles within the fields of experimental and clinical oncology. The journal, which is chiefly devoted to Original papers, also includes Reviews as well as Editorials and Guest editorials on current, controversial topics. The section Letters to the editors provides a forum for a rapid exchange of comments and information concerning previously published papers and topics of current interest. Meeting reports provide current information on the latest results presented at important congresses.
The following fields are covered: carcinogenesis - etiology, mechanisms; molecular biology; recent developments in tumor therapy; general diagnosis; laboratory diagnosis; diagnostic and experimental pathology; oncologic surgery; and epidemiology.