新颖的cemp程序揭示了峰谷潜伏期的两性二态性。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience Pub Date : 2025-04-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fnint.2025.1454924
Max Gattie, Elena V M Lieven, Karolina Kluk
{"title":"新颖的cemp程序揭示了峰谷潜伏期的两性二态性。","authors":"Max Gattie, Elena V M Lieven, Karolina Kluk","doi":"10.3389/fnint.2025.1454924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Sex difference in latency for cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) has been reported in Brown Norway rats. Human investigations of sex difference in VEMP latency have shown inconsistent results, although there are indicators of sexual dimorphism in vestibular function and a higher reporting rate for vestibular disorder in women than in men.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sex effects in human VEMP were re-evaluated here using a procedure adapting clinical protocols for higher sensitivity. VEMP was compared between 24 women and 24 men using a novel procedure that (1) controlled neck tension with biofeedback and a padded head bar; (2) used body-conducted stimuli to eliminate sound exposure concerns and collect appreciably more data than is feasible with air-conducted stimuli; which in turn (3) increased statistical power because there were sufficient data for a linear mixed effects regression modelling analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Women had significantly shorter VEMP peak to trough latency than men. The sex difference of 2.4 ms (95% CI [-0.9, -3.9], p = 0.0020) was 21% of the mean 11.4 ms VEMP peak to trough latency measured across women and men. There was no significant sex difference in VEMP peak to trough amplitude. These findings are a reversal of several prior studies in humans, reviewed here with a simulation indicating the studies may have been underpowered.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Findings are consistent with those in Brown Norway Rats, for which a study design featuring a custom rodent holder to control neck tension, extension of test sequences in comparison to those typically used in VEMP protocols for humans, and insertion of electrodes subcutaneously will have increased sensitivity compared to that achievable with clinical VEMP protocols for humans. Findings are interpreted as sex hormones affecting myelination or synaptic response; sexual dimorphism in neck/head size may also have contributed. The vestibular periphery and brainstem are highly conserved across vertebrates with similar findings in rat and human supporting use of VEMP as a reliable, non-invasive indicator of vestibular function. VEMP measures in humans may require higher sensitivity than is achievable using current clinical protocols in order to produce consistent results.</p>","PeriodicalId":56016,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience","volume":"19 ","pages":"1454924"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12014665/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Novel cVEMP procedure reveals sexual dimorphism in peak to trough latency.\",\"authors\":\"Max Gattie, Elena V M Lieven, Karolina Kluk\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fnint.2025.1454924\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Sex difference in latency for cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) has been reported in Brown Norway rats. Human investigations of sex difference in VEMP latency have shown inconsistent results, although there are indicators of sexual dimorphism in vestibular function and a higher reporting rate for vestibular disorder in women than in men.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sex effects in human VEMP were re-evaluated here using a procedure adapting clinical protocols for higher sensitivity. VEMP was compared between 24 women and 24 men using a novel procedure that (1) controlled neck tension with biofeedback and a padded head bar; (2) used body-conducted stimuli to eliminate sound exposure concerns and collect appreciably more data than is feasible with air-conducted stimuli; which in turn (3) increased statistical power because there were sufficient data for a linear mixed effects regression modelling analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Women had significantly shorter VEMP peak to trough latency than men. The sex difference of 2.4 ms (95% CI [-0.9, -3.9], p = 0.0020) was 21% of the mean 11.4 ms VEMP peak to trough latency measured across women and men. There was no significant sex difference in VEMP peak to trough amplitude. These findings are a reversal of several prior studies in humans, reviewed here with a simulation indicating the studies may have been underpowered.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Findings are consistent with those in Brown Norway Rats, for which a study design featuring a custom rodent holder to control neck tension, extension of test sequences in comparison to those typically used in VEMP protocols for humans, and insertion of electrodes subcutaneously will have increased sensitivity compared to that achievable with clinical VEMP protocols for humans. Findings are interpreted as sex hormones affecting myelination or synaptic response; sexual dimorphism in neck/head size may also have contributed. The vestibular periphery and brainstem are highly conserved across vertebrates with similar findings in rat and human supporting use of VEMP as a reliable, non-invasive indicator of vestibular function. VEMP measures in humans may require higher sensitivity than is achievable using current clinical protocols in order to produce consistent results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56016,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"1454924\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12014665/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2025.1454924\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2025.1454924","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:在布朗挪威大鼠中发现了颈前庭诱发肌源电位(VEMP)潜伏期的性别差异。人类对VEMP潜伏期性别差异的研究显示出不一致的结果,尽管前庭功能有性别二态性的指标,女性前庭功能障碍的报告率高于男性。方法:性别对人类VEMP的影响在这里重新评估使用程序适应临床方案更高的敏感性。采用一种新颖的方法对24名女性和24名男性的VEMP进行比较:(1)通过生物反馈和垫头棒控制颈部张力;(2)使用身体传导刺激来消除声音暴露问题,并收集比空气传导刺激多得多的数据;这反过来又(3)增加了统计能力,因为有足够的数据进行线性混合效应回归建模分析。结果:女性的VEMP峰谷潜伏期明显短于男性。2.4 ms的性别差异(95% CI [-0.9, -3.9], p = 0.0020)是女性和男性平均11.4 ms VEMP峰谷潜伏期的21%。VEMP峰谷振幅性别差异不显著。这些发现是对先前几项人类研究的逆转,这里用模拟来回顾,表明这些研究可能力度不足。讨论:研究结果与棕色挪威大鼠一致,研究设计采用定制的啮齿动物支架来控制颈部张力,与人类VEMP方案中典型使用的测试序列相比,延长测试序列,皮下插入电极与人类临床VEMP方案相比,将具有更高的灵敏度。结果被解释为性激素影响髓鞘形成或突触反应;颈部/头部大小的两性二态性也可能是原因之一。前庭外周和脑干在脊椎动物中高度保守,在大鼠和人类中也有类似的发现,支持将VEMP作为前庭功能的可靠、非侵入性指标。为了产生一致的结果,人体VEMP测量可能需要比目前临床方案所能达到的更高的灵敏度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Novel cVEMP procedure reveals sexual dimorphism in peak to trough latency.

Introduction: Sex difference in latency for cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) has been reported in Brown Norway rats. Human investigations of sex difference in VEMP latency have shown inconsistent results, although there are indicators of sexual dimorphism in vestibular function and a higher reporting rate for vestibular disorder in women than in men.

Methods: Sex effects in human VEMP were re-evaluated here using a procedure adapting clinical protocols for higher sensitivity. VEMP was compared between 24 women and 24 men using a novel procedure that (1) controlled neck tension with biofeedback and a padded head bar; (2) used body-conducted stimuli to eliminate sound exposure concerns and collect appreciably more data than is feasible with air-conducted stimuli; which in turn (3) increased statistical power because there were sufficient data for a linear mixed effects regression modelling analysis.

Results: Women had significantly shorter VEMP peak to trough latency than men. The sex difference of 2.4 ms (95% CI [-0.9, -3.9], p = 0.0020) was 21% of the mean 11.4 ms VEMP peak to trough latency measured across women and men. There was no significant sex difference in VEMP peak to trough amplitude. These findings are a reversal of several prior studies in humans, reviewed here with a simulation indicating the studies may have been underpowered.

Discussion: Findings are consistent with those in Brown Norway Rats, for which a study design featuring a custom rodent holder to control neck tension, extension of test sequences in comparison to those typically used in VEMP protocols for humans, and insertion of electrodes subcutaneously will have increased sensitivity compared to that achievable with clinical VEMP protocols for humans. Findings are interpreted as sex hormones affecting myelination or synaptic response; sexual dimorphism in neck/head size may also have contributed. The vestibular periphery and brainstem are highly conserved across vertebrates with similar findings in rat and human supporting use of VEMP as a reliable, non-invasive indicator of vestibular function. VEMP measures in humans may require higher sensitivity than is achievable using current clinical protocols in order to produce consistent results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience Neuroscience-Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
148
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research that synthesizes multiple facets of brain structure and function, to better understand how multiple diverse functions are integrated to produce complex behaviors. Led by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts, this multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. Our goal is to publish research related to furthering the understanding of the integrative mechanisms underlying brain functioning across one or more interacting levels of neural organization. In most real life experiences, sensory inputs from several modalities converge and interact in a manner that influences perception and actions generating purposeful and social behaviors. The journal is therefore focused on the primary questions of how multiple sensory, cognitive and emotional processes merge to produce coordinated complex behavior. It is questions such as this that cannot be answered at a single level – an ion channel, a neuron or a synapse – that we wish to focus on. In Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience we welcome in vitro or in vivo investigations across the molecular, cellular, and systems and behavioral level. Research in any species and at any stage of development and aging that are focused at understanding integration mechanisms underlying emergent properties of the brain and behavior are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信