{"title":"不同运动类型对大学生身体成分影响的比较：随机对照试验的系统回顾和meta分析。","authors":"Jihai Li, Liuhong Zang, Sihai Hao, Hui Wang","doi":"10.3389/fphys.2025.1537937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To systematically assess the impact of various exercise modalities and dosages on the body composition of college students through a comprehensive review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive search of relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in eight databases, covering data from the inception of each database to August 2024. Following the literature screening, two investigators independently conducted data extraction and assessed the risk of bias. Network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted using Stata 17.0 with random-effects modeling, while dose-response analysis was performed utilizing R version 4.3.1.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 43 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), encompassing 3,154 participants, were included in the analysis. Aerobic exercise, combined exercise, high-intensity interval training (HIIT), mind-body exercise, and calisthenics demonstrated significant effects on reducing body mass index (BMI) compared to control groups. Surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) probability rankings indicated that calisthenics had the highest likelihood of being the most effective intervention for BMI reduction, whereas resistance exercise was associated with the lowest likelihood. The dose-response analysis revealed that the threshold exercise dose for overall exercise to lower BMI was 310 METs-min/week, with the predicted maximum significant response dose being 1,300 METs-min/week, beyond which there was minimal change in the intervention effect. Additionally, distinct nonlinear dose-response relationships were observed for aerobic exercise, combined exercise, HIIT, mind-body exercise, and aerobics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No significant differences in the effectiveness of exercise interventions on body composition were observed across exercise types. However, based on the SUCRA analysis, calisthenics emerged as the preferred intervention, succeeded by a combination of exercises. The optimal exercise dosage for enhancing body composition was identified as 1,300 METs-min/week, with the threshold for a significant effect being relatively low.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024587032.</p>","PeriodicalId":12477,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Physiology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1537937"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12053280/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative efficacy of different exercise types on body composition in university students: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.\",\"authors\":\"Jihai Li, Liuhong Zang, Sihai Hao, Hui Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fphys.2025.1537937\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To systematically assess the impact of various exercise modalities and dosages on the body composition of college students through a comprehensive review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive search of relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in eight databases, covering data from the inception of each database to August 2024. Following the literature screening, two investigators independently conducted data extraction and assessed the risk of bias. Network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted using Stata 17.0 with random-effects modeling, while dose-response analysis was performed utilizing R version 4.3.1.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 43 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), encompassing 3,154 participants, were included in the analysis. Aerobic exercise, combined exercise, high-intensity interval training (HIIT), mind-body exercise, and calisthenics demonstrated significant effects on reducing body mass index (BMI) compared to control groups. Surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) probability rankings indicated that calisthenics had the highest likelihood of being the most effective intervention for BMI reduction, whereas resistance exercise was associated with the lowest likelihood. The dose-response analysis revealed that the threshold exercise dose for overall exercise to lower BMI was 310 METs-min/week, with the predicted maximum significant response dose being 1,300 METs-min/week, beyond which there was minimal change in the intervention effect. Additionally, distinct nonlinear dose-response relationships were observed for aerobic exercise, combined exercise, HIIT, mind-body exercise, and aerobics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No significant differences in the effectiveness of exercise interventions on body composition were observed across exercise types. However, based on the SUCRA analysis, calisthenics emerged as the preferred intervention, succeeded by a combination of exercises. The optimal exercise dosage for enhancing body composition was identified as 1,300 METs-min/week, with the threshold for a significant effect being relatively low.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024587032.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12477,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Physiology\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"1537937\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12053280/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2025.1537937\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2025.1537937","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative efficacy of different exercise types on body composition in university students: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Background: To systematically assess the impact of various exercise modalities and dosages on the body composition of college students through a comprehensive review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search of relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in eight databases, covering data from the inception of each database to August 2024. Following the literature screening, two investigators independently conducted data extraction and assessed the risk of bias. Network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted using Stata 17.0 with random-effects modeling, while dose-response analysis was performed utilizing R version 4.3.1.
Results: A total of 43 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), encompassing 3,154 participants, were included in the analysis. Aerobic exercise, combined exercise, high-intensity interval training (HIIT), mind-body exercise, and calisthenics demonstrated significant effects on reducing body mass index (BMI) compared to control groups. Surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) probability rankings indicated that calisthenics had the highest likelihood of being the most effective intervention for BMI reduction, whereas resistance exercise was associated with the lowest likelihood. The dose-response analysis revealed that the threshold exercise dose for overall exercise to lower BMI was 310 METs-min/week, with the predicted maximum significant response dose being 1,300 METs-min/week, beyond which there was minimal change in the intervention effect. Additionally, distinct nonlinear dose-response relationships were observed for aerobic exercise, combined exercise, HIIT, mind-body exercise, and aerobics.
Conclusion: No significant differences in the effectiveness of exercise interventions on body composition were observed across exercise types. However, based on the SUCRA analysis, calisthenics emerged as the preferred intervention, succeeded by a combination of exercises. The optimal exercise dosage for enhancing body composition was identified as 1,300 METs-min/week, with the threshold for a significant effect being relatively low.
期刊介绍：
Frontiers in Physiology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research on the physiology of living systems, from the subcellular and molecular domains to the intact organism, and its interaction with the environment. Field Chief Editor George E. Billman at the Ohio State University Columbus is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
