贻贝启发的引物对树脂-牙本质结合界面稳定性的影响:系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Samuel Chillavert Dias Pascoal, Maria Clara Ayres Estellita, Fábio Wildson Gurgel Costa, Juliano Sartori Mendonça
{"title":"贻贝启发的引物对树脂-牙本质结合界面稳定性的影响:系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Samuel Chillavert Dias Pascoal,&nbsp;Maria Clara Ayres Estellita,&nbsp;Fábio Wildson Gurgel Costa,&nbsp;Juliano Sartori Mendonça","doi":"10.1111/eos.70011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper presents the results of a systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy of mussel-inspired primers on resin-dentin bond stability. This review was registered on the OSF platform (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/QC7VU) and followed PRISMA guidelines. Databases included PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science, EMBASE, Lilacs, LIVIVO, and gray literature. Eligibility criteria included in vitro studies using human dentin, which assessed bond strength through microtensile tests after applying mussel-inspired primers. Exclusion criteria were studies evaluating bond strength to enamel, animal dentin, and ceramics, those not using the microtensile test, or those conducting immediate evaluation only. The RoBDEMAT tool was used for risk-of-bias analysis. Two independent reviewers screened 5522 articles, and seven were selected. The studies showed a similar risk of bias performance, with insufficient reporting of different parameters, while not presenting significant publication bias. Meta-analysis revealed significantly higher bond strength in specimens treated with mussel-inspired monomers after thermocycling. Across studies, no substantial reduction in heterogeneity was observed using the leave-one-out method. Mussel-inspired monomers incorporated into the dentin adhesive procedure can enhance bond strength, mainly through their catecholic groups, highlighting their potential in adhesive dentistry. However, drawbacks such as oxidative potential and effects on the degree of conversion may limit their widespread application.</p>","PeriodicalId":11983,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Oral Sciences","volume":"133 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/eos.70011","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of mussel-inspired primers on resin–dentin bonding interface stability: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Samuel Chillavert Dias Pascoal,&nbsp;Maria Clara Ayres Estellita,&nbsp;Fábio Wildson Gurgel Costa,&nbsp;Juliano Sartori Mendonça\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/eos.70011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This paper presents the results of a systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy of mussel-inspired primers on resin-dentin bond stability. This review was registered on the OSF platform (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/QC7VU) and followed PRISMA guidelines. Databases included PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science, EMBASE, Lilacs, LIVIVO, and gray literature. Eligibility criteria included in vitro studies using human dentin, which assessed bond strength through microtensile tests after applying mussel-inspired primers. Exclusion criteria were studies evaluating bond strength to enamel, animal dentin, and ceramics, those not using the microtensile test, or those conducting immediate evaluation only. The RoBDEMAT tool was used for risk-of-bias analysis. Two independent reviewers screened 5522 articles, and seven were selected. The studies showed a similar risk of bias performance, with insufficient reporting of different parameters, while not presenting significant publication bias. Meta-analysis revealed significantly higher bond strength in specimens treated with mussel-inspired monomers after thermocycling. Across studies, no substantial reduction in heterogeneity was observed using the leave-one-out method. Mussel-inspired monomers incorporated into the dentin adhesive procedure can enhance bond strength, mainly through their catecholic groups, highlighting their potential in adhesive dentistry. However, drawbacks such as oxidative potential and effects on the degree of conversion may limit their widespread application.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Oral Sciences\",\"volume\":\"133 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/eos.70011\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Oral Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eos.70011\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Oral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eos.70011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了贻贝启发的引物对树脂-牙本质键稳定性的功效的系统回顾和荟萃分析的结果。该审查已在OSF平台(https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/QC7VU)上注册,并遵循PRISMA指南。数据库包括PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science, EMBASE, Lilacs, LIVIVO和灰色文献。资格标准包括使用人牙本质的体外研究,在应用贻贝启发的引物后,通过微拉伸测试评估结合强度。排除标准是评估与牙釉质、动物牙本质和陶瓷的结合强度的研究,不使用微拉伸试验的研究,或仅进行即时评估的研究。使用RoBDEMAT工具进行偏倚风险分析。2位独立审稿人筛选了5522篇文章,最终入选7篇。这些研究显示了相似的偏倚风险,不同参数的报道不足,但没有出现显著的发表偏倚。荟萃分析显示,在热循环后,用贻贝激发单体处理的标本的结合强度显着提高。在所有研究中,使用“留一法”没有观察到异质性的实质性减少。以贻贝为灵感的单体结合到牙本质粘合过程中,可以增强粘合强度,主要是通过它们的天主教基团,突出了它们在粘合牙科方面的潜力。然而,氧化电位和对转化程度的影响等缺点可能限制了它们的广泛应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of mussel-inspired primers on resin–dentin bonding interface stability: A systematic review and meta-analysis

This paper presents the results of a systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy of mussel-inspired primers on resin-dentin bond stability. This review was registered on the OSF platform (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/QC7VU) and followed PRISMA guidelines. Databases included PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science, EMBASE, Lilacs, LIVIVO, and gray literature. Eligibility criteria included in vitro studies using human dentin, which assessed bond strength through microtensile tests after applying mussel-inspired primers. Exclusion criteria were studies evaluating bond strength to enamel, animal dentin, and ceramics, those not using the microtensile test, or those conducting immediate evaluation only. The RoBDEMAT tool was used for risk-of-bias analysis. Two independent reviewers screened 5522 articles, and seven were selected. The studies showed a similar risk of bias performance, with insufficient reporting of different parameters, while not presenting significant publication bias. Meta-analysis revealed significantly higher bond strength in specimens treated with mussel-inspired monomers after thermocycling. Across studies, no substantial reduction in heterogeneity was observed using the leave-one-out method. Mussel-inspired monomers incorporated into the dentin adhesive procedure can enhance bond strength, mainly through their catecholic groups, highlighting their potential in adhesive dentistry. However, drawbacks such as oxidative potential and effects on the degree of conversion may limit their widespread application.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Oral Sciences
European Journal of Oral Sciences 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
61
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Oral Sciences is an international journal which publishes original research papers within clinical dentistry, on all basic science aspects of structure, chemistry, developmental biology, physiology and pathology of relevant tissues, as well as on microbiology, biomaterials and the behavioural sciences as they relate to dentistry. In general, analytical studies are preferred to descriptive ones. Reviews, Short Communications and Letters to the Editor will also be considered for publication. The journal is published bimonthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信