[MSB-32]体外循环与常规体外循环患者血小板变化的比较。

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY
Ömer Faruk Rahman, Ahmet Daylan, Mert Arslangilay, Zümra Hacıköleoğlu, Önder Turgut Bozkurt, Şahin Bozok
{"title":"[MSB-32]体外循环与常规体外循环患者血小板变化的比较。","authors":"Ömer Faruk Rahman, Ahmet Daylan, Mert Arslangilay, Zümra Hacıköleoğlu, Önder Turgut Bozkurt, Şahin Bozok","doi":"10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2024.msb-32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of mini-extracorporeal circulation (MECC) in reducing platelet damage compared to conventional cardiopulmonary bypass (CCPB).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-seven patients (52 males, 15 females; mean age: 63.04±8.08 years) who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting between August 2022 and February 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups: CCPB (n=37) and MECC (n=30). Demographic data, comorbidities, operative variables, laboratory values, and drainage volume data were collected from electronic medical records.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant difference in median drainage volume was found between the MECC group and the CCPB group (300 mL <i>vs.</i> 350 mL; p=0.178). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups regarding cardiopulmonary bypass time and cross-clamp time (p=0.160 and p=0.158, respectively). There was no significant difference between the groups in preoperative and postoperative platelet counts (p=0.687 and p=0.335, respectively). The mean decrease in postoperative platelet count was 0.89±3.99% in the MECC group and 13±2.98% in the CCPB group. The difference in platelet count change between the groups was found to be statistically significant (p=0.028).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests that mini extracorporeal circulation significantly reduces postoperative platelet decline compared to conventional cardiopulmonary bypass, indicating its potential to better preserve platelet levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":49413,"journal":{"name":"Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi-Turkish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":"32 4 Suppl 2","pages":"056-56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12045215/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[MSB-32] Comparison of Platelet Changes Between Mini-Extracorporeal Circulation and Conventional Cardiopulmonary Bypass.\",\"authors\":\"Ömer Faruk Rahman, Ahmet Daylan, Mert Arslangilay, Zümra Hacıköleoğlu, Önder Turgut Bozkurt, Şahin Bozok\",\"doi\":\"10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2024.msb-32\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of mini-extracorporeal circulation (MECC) in reducing platelet damage compared to conventional cardiopulmonary bypass (CCPB).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-seven patients (52 males, 15 females; mean age: 63.04±8.08 years) who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting between August 2022 and February 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups: CCPB (n=37) and MECC (n=30). Demographic data, comorbidities, operative variables, laboratory values, and drainage volume data were collected from electronic medical records.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant difference in median drainage volume was found between the MECC group and the CCPB group (300 mL <i>vs.</i> 350 mL; p=0.178). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups regarding cardiopulmonary bypass time and cross-clamp time (p=0.160 and p=0.158, respectively). There was no significant difference between the groups in preoperative and postoperative platelet counts (p=0.687 and p=0.335, respectively). The mean decrease in postoperative platelet count was 0.89±3.99% in the MECC group and 13±2.98% in the CCPB group. The difference in platelet count change between the groups was found to be statistically significant (p=0.028).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests that mini extracorporeal circulation significantly reduces postoperative platelet decline compared to conventional cardiopulmonary bypass, indicating its potential to better preserve platelet levels.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49413,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi-Turkish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"volume\":\"32 4 Suppl 2\",\"pages\":\"056-56\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12045215/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi-Turkish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2024.msb-32\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Dergisi-Turkish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2024.msb-32","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评价微型体外循环(MECC)与常规体外循环(CCPB)相比在减少血小板损伤方面的疗效。方法:67例患者(男52例,女15例;回顾性分析2022年8月至2024年2月间行冠状动脉旁路移植术患者的平均年龄:63.04±8.08岁。患者分为两组:CCPB组(n=37)和MECC组(n=30)。从电子病历中收集人口统计数据、合并症、手术变量、实验室值和引流量数据。结果:MECC组与CCPB组中位引流量无显著差异(300 mL vs 350 mL;p = 0.178)。两组体外循环时间和交叉钳夹时间比较,差异无统计学意义(p=0.160、p=0.158)。两组患者术前、术后血小板计数差异无统计学意义(p=0.687、p=0.335)。MECC组术后血小板计数平均下降0.89±3.99%,CCPB组术后血小板计数平均下降13±2.98%。两组间血小板计数变化差异有统计学意义(p=0.028)。结论:本研究提示,与传统体外循环相比,体外循环能显著减少术后血小板下降,表明体外循环能更好地保持血小板水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[MSB-32] Comparison of Platelet Changes Between Mini-Extracorporeal Circulation and Conventional Cardiopulmonary Bypass.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of mini-extracorporeal circulation (MECC) in reducing platelet damage compared to conventional cardiopulmonary bypass (CCPB).

Methods: Sixty-seven patients (52 males, 15 females; mean age: 63.04±8.08 years) who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting between August 2022 and February 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups: CCPB (n=37) and MECC (n=30). Demographic data, comorbidities, operative variables, laboratory values, and drainage volume data were collected from electronic medical records.

Results: No significant difference in median drainage volume was found between the MECC group and the CCPB group (300 mL vs. 350 mL; p=0.178). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups regarding cardiopulmonary bypass time and cross-clamp time (p=0.160 and p=0.158, respectively). There was no significant difference between the groups in preoperative and postoperative platelet counts (p=0.687 and p=0.335, respectively). The mean decrease in postoperative platelet count was 0.89±3.99% in the MECC group and 13±2.98% in the CCPB group. The difference in platelet count change between the groups was found to be statistically significant (p=0.028).

Conclusion: This study suggests that mini extracorporeal circulation significantly reduces postoperative platelet decline compared to conventional cardiopulmonary bypass, indicating its potential to better preserve platelet levels.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
98
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Turkish Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery is an international open access journal which publishes original articles on topics in generality of Cardiac, Thoracic, Arterial, Venous, Lymphatic Disorders and their managements. These encompass all relevant clinical, surgical and experimental studies, editorials, current and collective reviews, technical know-how papers, case reports, interesting images, How to Do It papers, correspondences, and commentaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信