Cay-Benedict von der Decken, Stefan Kleinert, Matthias Englbrecht, Kirsten Karberg, Georg Gauler, Monika Ronneberger, Praxedis Rapp, Florian Schuch, Joerg Wendler, Susanna Späthling-Mestekemper, Christoph Kuhn, Wolfgang Vorbrüggen, Martin Welcker, Peter Bartz-Bazzanella
{"title":"RhePort 1.3增强了炎性风湿病的早期识别:德国风湿病学环境的一项前瞻性研究","authors":"Cay-Benedict von der Decken, Stefan Kleinert, Matthias Englbrecht, Kirsten Karberg, Georg Gauler, Monika Ronneberger, Praxedis Rapp, Florian Schuch, Joerg Wendler, Susanna Späthling-Mestekemper, Christoph Kuhn, Wolfgang Vorbrüggen, Martin Welcker, Peter Bartz-Bazzanella","doi":"10.1007/s00296-025-05861-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>More efficient means of identifying patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRDs) could allow earlier diagnosis and treatment. The objective of this study was to evaluate the characteristics of a revised version of an online patient questionnaire-based self-referral tool, RhePort 1.3. This prospective study included adult patients with musculoskeletal complaints presenting for a first rheumatology visit at German RheumaDatenRhePort (RHADAR) rheumatology network centers. All patients completed the RhePort 1.3 questionnaire on patient characteristics and symptoms. Data from RhePort 1.3 were compared with historical data from previous versions. Of 614 patients, 225 (36.6%) were diagnosed with an IRD by a rheumatologist and 164/225 IRD patients (72.9%) had a RhePort 1.3 score > 1, the cut-off point used to determine the need for rheumatologic evaluation. A score > 1 was associated with an approximately two-fold higher IRD risk (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] of 1.98 [1.39, 2.83] vs ≤ 1) and had good sensitivity (73%) and moderate specificity (42%). Among patients referred through a standard referral pathway (n = 283), RhePort 1.3 scores > 1 in addition to physician referral were associated with increases in rheumatology-diagnosed IRD rates from 33.2% (physician referral only) to 45.7%. RhePort 1.3 had higher accuracy than earlier versions (54% vs 35%). We conclude that modest changes to the RhePort questionnaire resulted in increased accuracy. A score > 1 was associated with a doubled risk for an IRD and higher IRD rates in physician-referred patients. These data suggest that RhePort has the potential to streamline the rheumatologist's workload and improve resource use. Further modifications are required to improve specificity.</p>","PeriodicalId":21322,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology International","volume":"45 5","pages":"129"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12037674/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"RhePort 1.3 enhances early identification of inflammatory rheumatic diseases: a prospective study in German rheumatology settings.\",\"authors\":\"Cay-Benedict von der Decken, Stefan Kleinert, Matthias Englbrecht, Kirsten Karberg, Georg Gauler, Monika Ronneberger, Praxedis Rapp, Florian Schuch, Joerg Wendler, Susanna Späthling-Mestekemper, Christoph Kuhn, Wolfgang Vorbrüggen, Martin Welcker, Peter Bartz-Bazzanella\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00296-025-05861-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>More efficient means of identifying patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRDs) could allow earlier diagnosis and treatment. The objective of this study was to evaluate the characteristics of a revised version of an online patient questionnaire-based self-referral tool, RhePort 1.3. This prospective study included adult patients with musculoskeletal complaints presenting for a first rheumatology visit at German RheumaDatenRhePort (RHADAR) rheumatology network centers. All patients completed the RhePort 1.3 questionnaire on patient characteristics and symptoms. Data from RhePort 1.3 were compared with historical data from previous versions. Of 614 patients, 225 (36.6%) were diagnosed with an IRD by a rheumatologist and 164/225 IRD patients (72.9%) had a RhePort 1.3 score > 1, the cut-off point used to determine the need for rheumatologic evaluation. A score > 1 was associated with an approximately two-fold higher IRD risk (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] of 1.98 [1.39, 2.83] vs ≤ 1) and had good sensitivity (73%) and moderate specificity (42%). Among patients referred through a standard referral pathway (n = 283), RhePort 1.3 scores > 1 in addition to physician referral were associated with increases in rheumatology-diagnosed IRD rates from 33.2% (physician referral only) to 45.7%. RhePort 1.3 had higher accuracy than earlier versions (54% vs 35%). We conclude that modest changes to the RhePort questionnaire resulted in increased accuracy. A score > 1 was associated with a doubled risk for an IRD and higher IRD rates in physician-referred patients. These data suggest that RhePort has the potential to streamline the rheumatologist's workload and improve resource use. Further modifications are required to improve specificity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rheumatology International\",\"volume\":\"45 5\",\"pages\":\"129\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12037674/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rheumatology International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-025-05861-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-025-05861-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
RhePort 1.3 enhances early identification of inflammatory rheumatic diseases: a prospective study in German rheumatology settings.
More efficient means of identifying patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRDs) could allow earlier diagnosis and treatment. The objective of this study was to evaluate the characteristics of a revised version of an online patient questionnaire-based self-referral tool, RhePort 1.3. This prospective study included adult patients with musculoskeletal complaints presenting for a first rheumatology visit at German RheumaDatenRhePort (RHADAR) rheumatology network centers. All patients completed the RhePort 1.3 questionnaire on patient characteristics and symptoms. Data from RhePort 1.3 were compared with historical data from previous versions. Of 614 patients, 225 (36.6%) were diagnosed with an IRD by a rheumatologist and 164/225 IRD patients (72.9%) had a RhePort 1.3 score > 1, the cut-off point used to determine the need for rheumatologic evaluation. A score > 1 was associated with an approximately two-fold higher IRD risk (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] of 1.98 [1.39, 2.83] vs ≤ 1) and had good sensitivity (73%) and moderate specificity (42%). Among patients referred through a standard referral pathway (n = 283), RhePort 1.3 scores > 1 in addition to physician referral were associated with increases in rheumatology-diagnosed IRD rates from 33.2% (physician referral only) to 45.7%. RhePort 1.3 had higher accuracy than earlier versions (54% vs 35%). We conclude that modest changes to the RhePort questionnaire resulted in increased accuracy. A score > 1 was associated with a doubled risk for an IRD and higher IRD rates in physician-referred patients. These data suggest that RhePort has the potential to streamline the rheumatologist's workload and improve resource use. Further modifications are required to improve specificity.
期刊介绍:
RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL is an independent journal reflecting world-wide progress in the research, diagnosis and treatment of the various rheumatic diseases. It is designed to serve researchers and clinicians in the field of rheumatology.
RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL will cover all modern trends in clinical research as well as in the management of rheumatic diseases. Special emphasis will be given to public health issues related to rheumatic diseases, applying rheumatology research to clinical practice, epidemiology of rheumatic diseases, diagnostic tests for rheumatic diseases, patient reported outcomes (PROs) in rheumatology and evidence on education of rheumatology. Contributions to these topics will appear in the form of original publications, short communications, editorials, and reviews. "Letters to the editor" will be welcome as an enhancement to discussion. Basic science research, including in vitro or animal studies, is discouraged to submit, as we will only review studies on humans with an epidemological or clinical perspective. Case reports without a proper review of the literatura (Case-based Reviews) will not be published. Every effort will be made to ensure speed of publication while maintaining a high standard of contents and production.
Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted.